Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Division

Overview

• The paper tackles the problem of fairly dividing indivisible goods among players when the players' values for the goods are unknown.
• The goal is to maximize social welfare while ensuring fair allocation of the goods in expectation.
• When a player's value for an item is unknown, the problem is reduced to a variant of the multi-armed bandit problem.
• Two fairness constraints are considered: envy-freeness in expectation and proportionality in expectation.
• The main result is an explore-then-commit algorithm that achieves $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret while maintaining either fairness constraint.
• A lower bound of $\tilde{\Omega}(T^{2/3})$ regret is also proven, showing that the algorithm's performance is tight.

Plain English Explanation

The paper deals with the challenge of dividing a limited number of different types of goods among a group of people in a fair way, when the value each person places on each type of good is not known upfront. The goal is to distribute the goods in a way that maximizes the overall benefit to the group, while ensuring that the allocation is fair in expectation.

The researchers model this problem as a variant of the multi-armed bandit problem, a well-studied problem in machine learning. In this case, each "arm" represents a player's value for a particular type of good. At each step, the algorithm must decide how to allocate the next item being distributed.

The paper considers two fairness constraints: envy-freeness in expectation and proportionality in expectation. Envy-freeness means that no player expects to get more utility from the goods allocated to another player. Proportionality means that each player expects to get at least their fair share of the total utility.

The main contribution of the paper is an algorithm that can achieve a good balance between maximizing overall utility and maintaining fairness, even when the players' preferences are unknown. The algorithm starts by exploring the players' values, then commits to an allocation strategy. The researchers prove that this approach can achieve near-optimal performance in terms of regret (the difference between the achieved utility and the maximum possible utility) while still satisfying the fairness constraints.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers the problem of online fair division of indivisible goods among players when the players' values for the goods are drawn from unknown distributions. The goal is to maximize social welfare subject to allocating the goods fairly in expectation.

When a player's value for an item is unknown at the time of allocation, the problem is reduced to a variant of the (stochastic) multi-armed bandit problem. In this formulation, there exists an "arm" for each player's value for each type of good. At each time step, the algorithm chooses a distribution over the arms, which determines how the next item is allocated.

The paper analyzes two sets of fairness constraints: envy-freeness in expectation and proportionality in expectation. Envy-freeness means that no player expects to get more utility from the goods allocated to another player. Proportionality means that each player expects to get at least their fair share of the total utility.

The main technical contribution is the design of an explore-then-commit algorithm that achieves $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret while maintaining either fairness constraint. This result relies on unique properties fundamental to fair-division constraints that allow faster rates of learning, despite the restricted action space.

The researchers also prove a lower bound of $\tilde{\Omega}(T^{2/3})$ regret for this setting, showing that their algorithm's performance is tight.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an important contribution to the field of fair online allocation of indivisible goods, which has practical applications in areas such as resource allocation, task assignment, and recommendation systems.

One potential limitation of the research is that it assumes the players' values are drawn from unknown distributions, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the algorithm and analysis would extend to settings where more information about the value distributions is available.

Additionally, the paper focuses on two specific fairness constraints (envy-freeness and proportionality in expectation). While these are well-studied fairness notions, it might be valuable to explore other fairness criteria, such as incentive-compatibility or merit-based fairness, and how they could be incorporated into the algorithm design.

Overall, the paper presents a strong theoretical foundation for fair online allocation of indivisible goods and opens up interesting directions for future research in this area.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the challenging problem of fairly dividing limited resources among players when the players' valuations are unknown. By framing the problem as a variant of the multi-armed bandit problem, the researchers develop an algorithm that can achieve near-optimal performance in terms of social welfare while satisfying important fairness constraints.

The paper's key contributions include the design of an explore-then-commit algorithm with strong theoretical guarantees, the analysis of two fairness notions (envy-freeness and proportionality in expectation), and the proof of tight lower bounds on the achievable regret.

This research has important implications for the design of fair and efficient resource allocation systems in a wide range of applications, from task assignment to recommendation engines. The insights and techniques developed in this paper could inspire further advances in the field of fair online decision-making under uncertainty.