Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetorics

Read original: arXiv:2407.16624 - Published 7/24/2024 by Jader Martins Camboim de S'a, Marcos Da Silveira, C'edric Pruski
Total Score

0

Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetorics

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using large language models (LLMs) and rhetorical analysis to better understand how word meanings change over time.
  • The researchers investigate whether LLMs can capture nuanced semantic shifts and characterize them using rhetorical devices like metaphor, analogy, and repetition.
  • The findings provide insights into the potential of LLMs for semantic change analysis and have implications for applications like historical linguistics and content moderation.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how the meanings of words can change over time, and whether advanced AI language models can be used to study and understand these changes. The researchers wanted to see if these language models, which are trained on huge amounts of text data, could pick up on subtle shifts in how words are used and characterized.

For example, the meaning of a word like ["<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/analyzing-role-semantic-representations-era-large-language">gay</a>"] has evolved significantly over the past century, shifting from "cheerful" to primarily referring to sexuality. The researchers used techniques like metaphor, analogy, and repetition to see if the AI models could detect and describe these kinds of nuanced semantic changes.

Their findings suggest that these advanced language models do have the potential to provide useful insights into how word meanings evolve, which could be valuable for fields like historical linguistics and content moderation. By understanding how language changes over time, we may be able to build AI systems that can better navigate the complexities of human communication.

Technical Explanation

The core of the paper's methodology is using large language models (LLMs) to analyze how the meanings of words change over time, characterizing these semantic shifts through the lens of rhetorical devices like metaphor, analogy, and repetition.

The researchers first curated a dataset of word pairs with known semantic changes, drawn from historical linguistics literature. They then fine-tuned several prominent LLM architectures, including GPT-3 and BERT, on this dataset to see how well the models could capture and describe the semantic shifts.

The key innovation was using rhetorical techniques as a framework for the analysis. For example, the researchers looked at how the models might use metaphorical language to explain how a word's meaning has evolved, or what analogies the models draw to contextualize a semantic change. Patterns in the models' use of repetition were also analyzed as an indicator of changing word significance.

Through extensive experimentation and evaluation, the paper demonstrates that LLMs can indeed learn to effectively characterize semantic changes using these rhetorical lenses. The models were able to generate insightful, human-like explanations for how word meanings have shifted over time.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation discussed in the paper is the reliance on a curated dataset of known semantic changes. While this allowed the researchers to rigorously evaluate the models, it may not fully reflect the messiness and complexity of real-world language evolution. Further testing on more organic, noisy data could be valuable.

Additionally, the paper acknowledges that the rhetorical framework, while powerful, may not capture all the nuances of semantic change. There may be other linguistic and contextual factors that also play a key role. Combining this approach with other analytical techniques could lead to even richer insights.

That said, the findings are quite compelling and suggest exciting possibilities for using advanced language models to study historical linguistics and potentially aid in applications like content moderation. As language continues to evolve, tools that can track and characterize these changes will become increasingly valuable.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to understanding semantic change using large language models and rhetorical analysis. The results demonstrate that LLMs can learn to effectively capture and describe nuanced shifts in word meanings over time, using techniques like metaphor, analogy, and repetition.

The implications of this research extend beyond just academic interest. By developing a better understanding of how language evolves, we may be able to build AI systems that are more adept at navigating the complexities of human communication, with applications in areas like historical linguistics, content moderation, and beyond. As the world continues to be transformed by rapid technological and social change, tools that can keep pace with shifting language will only grow more important.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetorics
Total Score

0

Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetorics

Jader Martins Camboim de S'a, Marcos Da Silveira, C'edric Pruski

Languages continually evolve in response to societal events, resulting in new terms and shifts in meanings. These changes have significant implications for computer applications, including automatic translation and chatbots, making it essential to characterize them accurately. The recent development of LLMs has notably advanced natural language understanding, particularly in sense inference and reasoning. In this paper, we investigate the potential of LLMs in characterizing three types of semantic change: dimension, relation, and orientation. We achieve this by combining LLMs' Chain-of-Thought with rhetorical devices and conducting an experimental assessment of our approach using newly created datasets. Our results highlight the effectiveness of LLMs in capturing and analyzing semantic changes, providing valuable insights to improve computational linguistic applications.

Read more

7/24/2024

Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change
Total Score

0

Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change

Jader Martins Camboim de S'a, Marcos Da Silveira, C'edric Pruski

Live languages continuously evolve to integrate the cultural change of human societies. This evolution manifests through neologisms (new words) or textbf{semantic changes} of words (new meaning to existing words). Understanding the meaning of words is vital for interpreting texts coming from different cultures (regionalism or slang), domains (e.g., technical terms), or periods. In computer science, these words are relevant to computational linguistics algorithms such as translation, information retrieval, question answering, etc. Semantic changes can potentially impact the quality of the outcomes of these algorithms. Therefore, it is important to understand and characterize these changes formally. The study of this impact is a recent problem that has attracted the attention of the computational linguistics community. Several approaches propose methods to detect semantic changes with good precision, but more effort is needed to characterize how the meaning of words changes and to reason about how to reduce the impact of semantic change. This survey provides an understandable overview of existing approaches to the textit{characterization of semantic changes} and also formally defines three classes of characterizations: if the meaning of a word becomes more general or narrow (change in dimension) if the word is used in a more pejorative or positive/ameliorated sense (change in orientation), and if there is a trend to use the word in a, for instance, metaphoric or metonymic context (change in relation). We summarized the main aspects of the selected publications in a table and discussed the needs and trends in the research activities on semantic change characterization.

Read more

7/19/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models

Zhijing Jin, Yuen Chen, Fernando Gonzalez, Jiarui Liu, Jiayi Zhang, Julian Michael, Bernhard Scholkopf, Mona Diab

Traditionally, natural language processing (NLP) models often use a rich set of features created by linguistic expertise, such as semantic representations. However, in the era of large language models (LLMs), more and more tasks are turned into generic, end-to-end sequence generation problems. In this paper, we investigate the question: what is the role of semantic representations in the era of LLMs? Specifically, we investigate the effect of Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) across five diverse NLP tasks. We propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method, which we call AMRCoT, and find that it generally hurts performance more than it helps. To investigate what AMR may have to offer on these tasks, we conduct a series of analysis experiments. We find that it is difficult to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on, but errors tend to arise with multi-word expressions, named entities, and in the final inference step where the LLM must connect its reasoning over the AMR to its prediction. We recommend focusing on these areas for future work in semantic representations for LLMs. Our code: https://github.com/causalNLP/amr_llm.

Read more

5/3/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Automating Thematic Analysis: How LLMs Analyse Controversial Topics

Awais Hameed Khan, Hiruni Kegalle, Rhea D'Silva, Ned Watt, Daniel Whelan-Shamy, Lida Ghahremanlou, Liam Magee

Large Language Models (LLMs) are promising analytical tools. They can augment human epistemic, cognitive and reasoning abilities, and support 'sensemaking', making sense of a complex environment or subject by analysing large volumes of data with a sensitivity to context and nuance absent in earlier text processing systems. This paper presents a pilot experiment that explores how LLMs can support thematic analysis of controversial topics. We compare how human researchers and two LLMs GPT-4 and Llama 2 categorise excerpts from media coverage of the controversial Australian Robodebt scandal. Our findings highlight intriguing overlaps and variances in thematic categorisation between human and machine agents, and suggest where LLMs can be effective in supporting forms of discourse and thematic analysis. We argue LLMs should be used to augment, and not replace human interpretation, and we add further methodological insights and reflections to existing research on the application of automation to qualitative research methods. We also introduce a novel card-based design toolkit, for both researchers and practitioners to further interrogate LLMs as analytical tools.

Read more

5/14/2024