Semantically-correlated memories in a dense associative model
2404.07123
0
0
Abstract
I introduce a novel associative memory model named Correlated Dense Associative Memory (CDAM), which integrates both auto- and hetero-association in a unified framework for continuous-valued memory patterns. Employing an arbitrary graph structure to semantically link memory patterns, CDAM is theoretically and numerically analysed, revealing four distinct dynamical modes: auto-association, narrow hetero-association, wide hetero-association, and neutral quiescence. Drawing inspiration from inhibitory modulation studies, I employ anti-Hebbian learning rules to control the range of hetero-association, extract multi-scale representations of community structures in graphs, and stabilise the recall of temporal sequences. Experimental demonstrations showcase CDAM's efficacy in handling real-world data, replicating a classical neuroscience experiment, performing image retrieval, and simulating arbitrary finite automata.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the neuroscience behind Transformer models, a type of deep learning architecture that has become widely used in natural language processing and other domains.
- The authors investigate the similarities and differences between the attention mechanisms in Transformers and the biological attention processes observed in the human brain.
- They explore how the architectural design of Transformers may be inspired by or reflect aspects of neural information processing in the brain.
Plain English Explanation
Transformer models are a type of artificial intelligence [AI] that have become very popular in recent years, especially for tasks like understanding and generating human language. These models are inspired by how the human brain processes information and pays attention to different parts of a problem.
The authors of this paper wanted to dig deeper into the connections between Transformer models and the way the brain works. They looked at the attention mechanisms used in Transformers and compared them to the attention processes that happen in the human brain. By understanding these parallels, the researchers hope to gain insights that can help improve the design and capabilities of Transformer models, as well as our overall understanding of how the brain computes and solves problems.
The paper explores the similarities and differences between the attention mechanisms in Transformers and the biological attention processes observed in the brain. It examines how the architectural design of Transformers may be influenced by or reflect certain aspects of neural information processing. This can lead to better AI systems that are more aligned with human intelligence and potentially even provide clues about how our own brains work.
Technical Explanation
The authors of this paper investigate the connections between the attention mechanisms used in Transformer models and the attention processes observed in the human brain. Transformer models, which have become widely adopted in natural language processing and other domains, rely on an attention mechanism that allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the input when making predictions.
The paper explores how the architectural design of Transformers, including the use of multi-head attention, may be inspired by or reflect aspects of neural information processing in the brain. The researchers analyze the similarities and differences between the computational principles underlying attention in Transformers and the biological mechanisms of attention in the human brain.
By drawing these parallels, the authors hope to gain insights that can lead to improvements in the design and capabilities of Transformer models, as well as a better understanding of the neural basis of attention and information processing in the brain. The paper provides a detailed technical analysis of the neuroscientific underpinnings of Transformer architectures.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched examination of the connections between Transformer models and the neuroscience of attention. The authors make a compelling case for the potential insights that can be gained by exploring these parallels, both for advancing AI systems and for enhancing our understanding of human cognition.
However, the paper also acknowledges several caveats and limitations in the current state of research. For example, the authors note that the attention mechanisms in Transformers are still relatively simple compared to the complex, multi-faceted attention processes observed in the brain. Additionally, the paper highlights the need for further empirical studies to validate the proposed connections and to investigate potential misalignments between artificial and biological attention.
While the paper offers valuable insights, it also raises important questions that warrant further investigation. For instance, the authors do not fully address how the architectural choices in Transformers may be influenced by other factors beyond neuroscientific principles, such as computational efficiency or engineering constraints. Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more critical examination of the limitations of using Transformer models as analogies for the brain, and the potential risks of overstating the connections between the two.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the emerging field of neuroscience of deep learning, and it provides a solid foundation for future research in this area. By encouraging a more nuanced and critical understanding of the relationships between artificial and biological attention, the authors pave the way for advancements in both AI and neuroscience.
Conclusion
This paper explores the neuroscience behind Transformer models, a type of deep learning architecture that has become widely used in natural language processing and other domains. The authors investigate the similarities and differences between the attention mechanisms in Transformers and the biological attention processes observed in the human brain.
By drawing these parallels, the researchers hope to gain insights that can lead to improvements in the design and capabilities of Transformer models, as well as a better understanding of the neural basis of attention and information processing in the brain. The paper provides a detailed technical analysis of the neuroscientific underpinnings of Transformer architectures and highlights the potential for cross-pollination between AI and neuroscience.
While the paper acknowledges several caveats and limitations, it makes a significant contribution to the emerging field of neuroscience of deep learning and paves the way for future research that can further elucidate the connections between artificial and biological attention processes. By fostering a more nuanced understanding of these relationships, the authors hope to drive advancements in both AI and our understanding of the human brain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Memory in Plain Sight: Surveying the Uncanny Resemblances of Associative Memories and Diffusion Models
Benjamin Hoover, Hendrik Strobelt, Dmitry Krotov, Judy Hoffman, Zsolt Kira, Duen Horng Chau
0
0
The generative process of Diffusion Models (DMs) has recently set state-of-the-art on many AI generation benchmarks. Though the generative process is traditionally understood as an iterative denoiser, there is no universally accepted language to describe it. We introduce a novel perspective to describe DMs using the mathematical language of memory retrieval from the field of energy-based Associative Memories (AMs), making efforts to keep our presentation approachable to newcomers to both of these fields. Unifying these two fields provides insight that DMs can be seen as a particular kind of AM where Lyapunov stability guarantees are bypassed by intelligently engineering the dynamics (i.e., the noise and step size schedules) of the denoising process. Finally, we present a growing body of evidence that records DMs exhibiting empirical behavior we would expect from AMs, and conclude by discussing research opportunities that are revealed by understanding DMs as a form of energy-based memory.
5/29/2024
🏷️
Entropic associative memory for real world images
No'e Hern'andez, Rafael Morales, Luis A. Pineda
0
0
The entropic associative memory (EAM) is a computational model of natural memory incorporating some of its putative properties of being associative, distributed, declarative, abstractive and constructive. Previous experiments satisfactorily tested the model on structured, homogeneous and conventional data: images of manuscripts digits and letters, images of clothing, and phone representations. In this work we show that EAM appropriately stores, recognizes and retrieves complex and unconventional images of animals and vehicles. Additionally, the memory system generates meaningful retrieval association chains for such complex images. The retrieved objects can be seen as proper memories, associated recollections or products of imagination.
5/22/2024
🏅
Bridging Associative Memory and Probabilistic Modeling
Rylan Schaeffer, Nika Zahedi, Mikail Khona, Dhruv Pai, Sang Truong, Yilun Du, Mitchell Ostrow, Sarthak Chandra, Andres Carranza, Ila Rani Fiete, Andrey Gromov, Sanmi Koyejo
0
0
Associative memory and probabilistic modeling are two fundamental topics in artificial intelligence. The first studies recurrent neural networks designed to denoise, complete and retrieve data, whereas the second studies learning and sampling from probability distributions. Based on the observation that associative memory's energy functions can be seen as probabilistic modeling's negative log likelihoods, we build a bridge between the two that enables useful flow of ideas in both directions. We showcase four examples: First, we propose new energy-based models that flexibly adapt their energy functions to new in-context datasets, an approach we term textit{in-context learning of energy functions}. Second, we propose two new associative memory models: one that dynamically creates new memories as necessitated by the training data using Bayesian nonparametrics, and another that explicitly computes proportional memory assignments using the evidence lower bound. Third, using tools from associative memory, we analytically and numerically characterize the memory capacity of Gaussian kernel density estimators, a widespread tool in probababilistic modeling. Fourth, we study a widespread implementation choice in transformers -- normalization followed by self attention -- to show it performs clustering on the hypersphere. Altogether, this work urges further exchange of useful ideas between these two continents of artificial intelligence.
6/14/2024
🧠
A Generic Shared Attention Mechanism for Various Backbone Neural Networks
Zhongzhan Huang, Senwei Liang, Mingfu Liang, Liang Lin
0
0
The self-attention mechanism has emerged as a critical component for improving the performance of various backbone neural networks. However, current mainstream approaches individually incorporate newly designed self-attention modules (SAMs) into each layer of the network for granted without fully exploiting their parameters' potential. This leads to suboptimal performance and increased parameter consumption as the network depth increases. To improve this paradigm, in this paper, we first present a counterintuitive but inherent phenomenon: SAMs tend to produce strongly correlated attention maps across different layers, with an average Pearson correlation coefficient of up to 0.85. Inspired by this inherent observation, we propose Dense-and-Implicit Attention (DIA), which directly shares SAMs across layers and employs a long short-term memory module to calibrate and bridge the highly correlated attention maps of different layers, thus improving the parameter utilization efficiency of SAMs. This design of DIA is also consistent with the neural network's dynamical system perspective. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our simple yet effective DIA can consistently enhance various network backbones, including ResNet, Transformer, and UNet, across tasks such as image classification, object detection, and image generation using diffusion models.
4/11/2024