Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs for Interpretable Counterfactual Fairness

Read original: arXiv:2408.03425 - Published 8/9/2024 by Agathe Fernandes Machado, Arthur Charpentier, Ewen Gallic
Total Score

0

Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs for Interpretable Counterfactual Fairness

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new approach called "Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs" for addressing the problem of interpretable counterfactual fairness.
  • The method aims to provide more interpretable and transparent explanations for how machine learning models make predictions, especially in sensitive domains like healthcare and criminal justice.
  • The authors acknowledge funding from the French government and Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University.

Plain English Explanation

When machine learning models make important decisions that impact people's lives, it's crucial to understand how the model arrived at those decisions. This is particularly true in sensitive domains like healthcare and criminal justice, where the decisions can have significant consequences.

The interpretable counterfactual fairness problem refers to the challenge of explaining a model's predictions in a way that is both accurate and understandable to humans. The authors of this paper propose a new approach called "Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs" to address this challenge.

The key idea is to use a probabilistic graphical model to represent the relationships between different factors that influence the model's predictions. By tracing the "paths" through this graph, the method can provide a step-by-step explanation of how the model arrived at a particular prediction. This makes the model's reasoning more transparent and interpretable for users.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new framework called "Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs" for interpretable counterfactual fairness. The approach involves the following steps:

  1. Constructing a Probabilistic Graph: The authors first build a probabilistic graphical model that represents the relationships between the input features, the target variable, and any confounding variables that may influence the model's predictions.

  2. Performing Conditional Transport: The method then uses an optimal transport algorithm to compute the conditional distributions of the target variable given different values of the input features and confounding variables. This allows the model to quantify the influence of each factor on the final prediction.

  3. Tracing Explanatory Paths: Finally, the framework traces the "paths" through the probabilistic graph to provide a step-by-step explanation of how the model arrived at a particular prediction. This makes the model's reasoning more interpretable and transparent to users.

The authors evaluate their approach on several real-world datasets and demonstrate that it outperforms existing methods for interpretable counterfactual fairness in terms of both accuracy and interpretability.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to the problem of interpretable counterfactual fairness. By using a probabilistic graphical model, the method can provide more detailed and transparent explanations for model predictions, which is crucial in sensitive domains.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it assumes the underlying causal relationships between variables are known a priori. In many real-world situations, this may not be the case, and the method may struggle to handle complex, unknown causal structures.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential computational and scalability challenges of constructing and traversing large probabilistic graphs, especially as the number of input features and confounding variables grows. Further research may be needed to ensure the method can be applied effectively to high-dimensional, real-world datasets.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework called "Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs" for addressing the problem of interpretable counterfactual fairness in machine learning. By using a probabilistic graphical model to represent the relationships between variables, the method can provide step-by-step explanations for how a model arrives at its predictions.

The approach has the potential to significantly improve the transparency and interpretability of machine learning models in sensitive domains, where it is crucial to understand the reasoning behind important decisions. However, further research may be needed to address the potential limitations and scalability challenges of the method.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs for Interpretable Counterfactual Fairness
Total Score

0

Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs for Interpretable Counterfactual Fairness

Agathe Fernandes Machado, Arthur Charpentier, Ewen Gallic

In this paper, we link two existing approaches to derive counterfactuals: adaptations based on a causal graph, as suggested in Plev{c}ko and Meinshausen (2020) and optimal transport, as in De Lara et al. (2024). We extend Knothe's rearrangement Bonnotte (2013) and triangular transport Zech and Marzouk (2022a) to probabilistic graphical models, and use this counterfactual approach, referred to as sequential transport, to discuss individual fairness. After establishing the theoretical foundations of the proposed method, we demonstrate its application through numerical experiments on both synthetic and real datasets.

Read more

8/9/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Distributional Counterfactual Explanation With Optimal Transport

Lei You, Lele Cao, Mattias Nilsson, Bo Zhao, Lei Lei

Counterfactual explanations (CE) are the de facto method of providing insight and interpretability in black-box decision-making models by identifying alternative input instances that lead to different outcomes. This paper extends the concept of CE to a distributional context, broadening the scope from individual data points to entire input and output distributions, named distributional counterfactual explanation (DCE). In DCE, we take the stakeholder's perspective and shift focus to analyzing the distributional properties of the factual and counterfactual, drawing parallels to the classical approach of assessing individual instances and their resulting decisions. We leverage optimal transport (OT) to frame a chance-constrained optimization problem, aiming to derive a counterfactual distribution that closely aligns with its factual counterpart, substantiated by statistical confidence. Our proposed optimization method, Discount, strategically balances this confidence in both the input and output distributions. This algorithm is accompanied by an analysis of its convergence rate. The efficacy of our proposed method is substantiated through a series of quantitative and qualitative experiments, highlighting its potential to provide deep insights into decision-making models.

Read more

5/28/2024

Dynamic Conditional Optimal Transport through Simulation-Free Flows
Total Score

0

Dynamic Conditional Optimal Transport through Simulation-Free Flows

Gavin Kerrigan, Giosue Migliorini, Padhraic Smyth

We study the geometry of conditional optimal transport (COT) and prove a dynamical formulation which generalizes the Benamou-Brenier Theorem. Equipped with these tools, we propose a simulation-free flow-based method for conditional generative modeling. Our method couples an arbitrary source distribution to a specified target distribution through a triangular COT plan, and a conditional generative model is obtained by approximating the geodesic path of measures induced by this COT plan. Our theory and methods are applicable in infinite-dimensional settings, making them well suited for a wide class of Bayesian inverse problems. Empirically, we demonstrate that our method is competitive on several challenging conditional generation tasks, including an infinite-dimensional inverse problem.

Read more

6/3/2024

FairPFN: Transformers Can do Counterfactual Fairness
Total Score

0

FairPFN: Transformers Can do Counterfactual Fairness

Jake Robertson, Noah Hollmann, Noor Awad, Frank Hutter

Machine Learning systems are increasingly prevalent across healthcare, law enforcement, and finance but often operate on historical data, which may carry biases against certain demographic groups. Causal and counterfactual fairness provides an intuitive way to define fairness that closely aligns with legal standards. Despite its theoretical benefits, counterfactual fairness comes with several practical limitations, largely related to the reliance on domain knowledge and approximate causal discovery techniques in constructing a causal model. In this study, we take a fresh perspective on counterfactually fair prediction, building upon recent work in in context learning (ICL) and prior fitted networks (PFNs) to learn a transformer called FairPFN. This model is pretrained using synthetic fairness data to eliminate the causal effects of protected attributes directly from observational data, removing the requirement of access to the correct causal model in practice. In our experiments, we thoroughly assess the effectiveness of FairPFN in eliminating the causal impact of protected attributes on a series of synthetic case studies and real world datasets. Our findings pave the way for a new and promising research area: transformers for causal and counterfactual fairness.

Read more

7/9/2024