Distributional Counterfactual Explanation With Optimal Transport

Read original: arXiv:2401.13112 - Published 5/28/2024 by Lei You, Lele Cao, Mattias Nilsson, Bo Zhao, Lei Lei

📉

Overview

Introduces a new concept called "distributional counterfactual explanation" (DCE) that extends the idea of counterfactual explanations beyond individual data points to entire input and output distributions.
Uses optimal transport to formulate a chance-constrained optimization problem that generates a counterfactual distribution closely aligned with the factual one, with statistical confidence.
Proposes an algorithm called "Discount" that balances the confidence in both the input and output distributions when deriving the counterfactual.
Evaluates the method through quantitative and qualitative experiments, highlighting its potential to provide deep insights into black-box decision-making models.

Plain English Explanation

Counterfactual explanations are a way to understand how black-box machine learning models make decisions. They identify alternative input instances that would lead to different outcomes. This paper takes this idea a step further by looking at the entire distribution of inputs and outputs, rather than just individual data points.

The key idea is to use a mathematical technique called optimal transport to find a counterfactual distribution - a set of alternative inputs and their corresponding outputs - that closely matches the real, or "factual," distribution. This counterfactual distribution provides insights into how the model behaves and why it makes the decisions it does.

The researchers developed an algorithm called "Discount" to efficiently generate this counterfactual distribution, balancing the need for it to be statistically similar to the factual distribution in terms of both the inputs and the outputs. Through experiments, they showed that this approach can offer deep, actionable insights into complex decision-making models.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of "distributional counterfactual explanation" (DCE), which extends the idea of counterfactual explanations from individual data points to entire input and output distributions.

The authors leverage optimal transport (OT) to frame a chance-constrained optimization problem, aiming to derive a counterfactual distribution that closely aligns with its factual counterpart, with statistical confidence. This is in contrast to previous work that focused on individual counterfactual explanations or model reconstruction using counterfactuals.

The proposed optimization method, Discount, strategically balances the confidence in both the input and output distributions when computing the counterfactual. The authors provide an analysis of the convergence rate of their algorithm.

The efficacy of the DCE approach is demonstrated through a series of quantitative and qualitative experiments, showcasing its ability to uncover deep insights into the decision-making process of black-box models.

Critical Analysis

The paper introduces an interesting and potentially valuable extension of counterfactual explanations by considering entire distributions rather than just individual data points. This distributional perspective could provide richer insights into model behavior and lead to more comprehensive understanding of complex decision-making systems.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or challenges of the DCE approach. For example, it is unclear how the method would scale to high-dimensional or large-scale datasets, or how robust it would be to noisy or incomplete data. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential ethical considerations around the use of counterfactual explanations, such as confounding issues or the risk of misuse.

Further research could explore the boundary conditions of the DCE approach, investigate ways to improve its efficiency and scalability, and address potential societal implications. Careful consideration of these factors will be important to ensure the responsible development and deployment of such techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach called "distributional counterfactual explanation" (DCE) that extends the concept of counterfactual explanations beyond individual data points to entire input and output distributions. By leveraging optimal transport, the DCE method can generate counterfactual distributions that closely align with their factual counterparts, providing deep insights into the decision-making process of black-box models.

The proposed Discount algorithm, which balances the confidence in both the input and output distributions, demonstrates the potential of this approach to uncover actionable insights that can lead to greater interpretability and accountability in complex decision-making systems. As the use of black-box models continues to grow, techniques like DCE will become increasingly important for understanding and validating the behavior of these models, with important implications for a wide range of applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Distributional Counterfactual Explanation With Optimal Transport

Lei You, Lele Cao, Mattias Nilsson, Bo Zhao, Lei Lei

Counterfactual explanations (CE) are the de facto method of providing insight and interpretability in black-box decision-making models by identifying alternative input instances that lead to different outcomes. This paper extends the concept of CE to a distributional context, broadening the scope from individual data points to entire input and output distributions, named distributional counterfactual explanation (DCE). In DCE, we take the stakeholder's perspective and shift focus to analyzing the distributional properties of the factual and counterfactual, drawing parallels to the classical approach of assessing individual instances and their resulting decisions. We leverage optimal transport (OT) to frame a chance-constrained optimization problem, aiming to derive a counterfactual distribution that closely aligns with its factual counterpart, substantiated by statistical confidence. Our proposed optimization method, Discount, strategically balances this confidence in both the input and output distributions. This algorithm is accompanied by an analysis of its convergence rate. The efficacy of our proposed method is substantiated through a series of quantitative and qualitative experiments, highlighting its potential to provide deep insights into decision-making models.

5/28/2024

Sequential Conditional Transport on Probabilistic Graphs for Interpretable Counterfactual Fairness

Agathe Fernandes Machado, Arthur Charpentier, Ewen Gallic

In this paper, we link two existing approaches to derive counterfactuals: adaptations based on a causal graph, as suggested in Plev{c}ko and Meinshausen (2020) and optimal transport, as in De Lara et al. (2024). We extend Knothe's rearrangement Bonnotte (2013) and triangular transport Zech and Marzouk (2022a) to probabilistic graphical models, and use this counterfactual approach, referred to as sequential transport, to discuss individual fairness. After establishing the theoretical foundations of the proposed method, we demonstrate its application through numerical experiments on both synthetic and real datasets.

8/9/2024

🧠

Provably Robust and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks via Robust Optimisation

Junqi Jiang, Jianglin Lan, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni

Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) have received increasing interest as a major methodology for explaining neural network classifiers. Usually, CEs for an input-output pair are defined as data points with minimum distance to the input that are classified with a different label than the output. To tackle the established problem that CEs are easily invalidated when model parameters are updated (e.g. retrained), studies have proposed ways to certify the robustness of CEs under model parameter changes bounded by a norm ball. However, existing methods targeting this form of robustness are not sound or complete, and they may generate implausible CEs, i.e., outliers wrt the training dataset. In fact, no existing method simultaneously optimises for closeness and plausibility while preserving robustness guarantees. In this work, we propose Provably RObust and PLAusible Counterfactual Explanations (PROPLACE), a method leveraging on robust optimisation techniques to address the aforementioned limitations in the literature. We formulate an iterative algorithm to compute provably robust CEs and prove its convergence, soundness and completeness. Through a comparative experiment involving six baselines, five of which target robustness, we show that PROPLACE achieves state-of-the-art performances against metrics on three evaluation aspects.

4/5/2024

CoLa-DCE -- Concept-guided Latent Diffusion Counterfactual Explanations

Franz Motzkus, Christian Hellert, Ute Schmid

Recent advancements in generative AI have introduced novel prospects and practical implementations. Especially diffusion models show their strength in generating diverse and, at the same time, realistic features, positioning them well for generating counterfactual explanations for computer vision models. Answering what if questions of what needs to change to make an image classifier change its prediction, counterfactual explanations align well with human understanding and consequently help in making model behavior more comprehensible. Current methods succeed in generating authentic counterfactuals, but lack transparency as feature changes are not directly perceivable. To address this limitation, we introduce Concept-guided Latent Diffusion Counterfactual Explanations (CoLa-DCE). CoLa-DCE generates concept-guided counterfactuals for any classifier with a high degree of control regarding concept selection and spatial conditioning. The counterfactuals comprise an increased granularity through minimal feature changes. The reference feature visualization ensures better comprehensibility, while the feature localization provides increased transparency of where changed what. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach in minimality and comprehensibility across multiple image classification models and datasets and provide insights into how our CoLa-DCE explanations help comprehend model errors like misclassification cases.

6/5/2024