Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning
2307.13586
0
0
š
Abstract
A central issue lying at the heart of online reinforcement learning (RL) is data efficiency. While a number of recent works achieved asymptotically minimal regret in online RL, the optimality of these results is only guaranteed in a ``large-sample'' regime, imposing enormous burn-in cost in order for their algorithms to operate optimally. How to achieve minimax-optimal regret without incurring any burn-in cost has been an open problem in RL theory. We settle this problem for the context of finite-horizon inhomogeneous Markov decision processes. Specifically, we prove that a modified version of Monotonic Value Propagation (MVP), a model-based algorithm proposed by cite{zhang2020reinforcement}, achieves a regret on the order of (modulo log factors) begin{equation*} minbig{ sqrt{SAH^3K}, ,HK big}, end{equation*} where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions, $H$ is the planning horizon, and $K$ is the total number of episodes. This regret matches the minimax lower bound for the entire range of sample size $Kgeq 1$, essentially eliminating any burn-in requirement. It also translates to a PAC sample complexity (i.e., the number of episodes needed to yield $varepsilon$-accuracy) of $frac{SAH^3}{varepsilon^2}$ up to log factor, which is minimax-optimal for the full $varepsilon$-range. Further, we extend our theory to unveil the influences of problem-dependent quantities like the optimal value/cost and certain variances. The key technical innovation lies in the development of a new regret decomposition strategy and a novel analysis paradigm to decouple complicated statistical dependency -- a long-standing challenge facing the analysis of online RL in the sample-hungry regime.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper addresses the problem of data efficiency in online reinforcement learning (RL).
- While recent algorithms have achieved asymptotically optimal regret, they require a large number of samples (a "burn-in" cost) before operating optimally.
- The authors present a new algorithm that achieves the minimax-optimal regret without any burn-in cost, settling an open problem in RL theory.
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make good decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or punishments. One of the key challenges in online RL is data efficiency - how to learn effectively with as few interactions with the environment as possible.
The authors of this paper looked at a specific type of RL problem, called a finite-horizon inhomogeneous Markov decision process. They developed a new algorithm called Modified Monotonic Value Propagation (MVP) that can achieve the best possible regret (a measure of how far the algorithm's performance is from the optimal) without requiring a large number of initial samples, which is a common problem with other RL algorithms.
The key technical innovation was a new way of analyzing the statistical dependencies in the RL problem, which allowed the authors to prove that their algorithm is minimax-optimal - meaning it performs as well as the best possible algorithm for this type of RL problem, across the entire range of sample sizes.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the context of finite-horizon inhomogeneous Markov decision processes (MDP), a common setting in RL. The authors prove that their Modified Monotonic Value Propagation (MVP) algorithm achieves a regret on the order of min{ā(SAHĀ³K), HK}, where S is the number of states, A is the number of actions, H is the planning horizon, and K is the total number of episodes.
This regret matches the minimax lower bound for the entire range of sample size K ā„ 1, eliminating the need for a large "burn-in" cost that other algorithms require before operating optimally. The algorithm also yields a minimax-optimal PAC sample complexity (the number of episodes needed to achieve a given accuracy level) of (SAHĀ³)/ĪµĀ² up to log factors, for the full range of accuracy Īµ.
The key technical innovation is a new regret decomposition strategy and analysis paradigm that can decouple the complicated statistical dependencies in the RL problem, which has been a long-standing challenge in the sample-hungry regime.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a strong theoretical result, proving that the Modified MVP algorithm can achieve minimax-optimal regret without any burn-in cost. This is a significant advancement in RL theory and addresses an open problem in the field.
However, the analysis is limited to the specific setting of finite-horizon inhomogeneous MDPs. It would be valuable to see if the techniques can be extended to other RL problem settings, such as infinite-horizon discounted MDPs, as explored in related works like Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processes.
Additionally, the paper does not provide any experimental results or practical considerations for implementing the algorithm. It would be helpful to see how the Modified MVP algorithm performs compared to other state-of-the-art RL algorithms in real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant theoretical contribution to the field of online reinforcement learning by presenting a new algorithm that achieves minimax-optimal regret without any burn-in cost. The key technical innovation is a novel regret decomposition strategy that can overcome the long-standing challenge of analyzing statistical dependencies in sample-hungry RL problems.
While the analysis is limited to a specific MDP setting, the techniques developed in this work could have broader implications for improving the sample efficiency of RL algorithms and advancing the theoretical understanding of the field. Further research is needed to explore the practical applications and potential extensions of this work.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Partial Dynamics Knowledge
Meshal Alharbi, Mardavij Roozbehani, Munther Dahleh
0
0
The problem of sample complexity of online reinforcement learning is often studied in the literature without taking into account any partial knowledge about the system dynamics that could potentially accelerate the learning process. In this paper, we study the sample complexity of online Q-learning methods when some prior knowledge about the dynamics is available or can be learned efficiently. We focus on systems that evolve according to an additive disturbance model of the form $S_{h+1} = f(S_h, A_h) + W_h$, where $f$ represents the underlying system dynamics, and $W_h$ are unknown disturbances independent of states and actions. In the setting of finite episodic Markov decision processes with $S$ states, $A$ actions, and episode length $H$, we present an optimistic Q-learning algorithm that achieves $tilde{mathcal{O}}(text{Poly}(H)sqrt{T})$ regret under perfect knowledge of $f$, where $T$ is the total number of interactions with the system. This is in contrast to the typical $tilde{mathcal{O}}(text{Poly}(H)sqrt{SAT})$ regret for existing Q-learning methods. Further, if only a noisy estimate $hat{f}$ of $f$ is available, our method can learn an approximately optimal policy in a number of samples that is independent of the cardinalities of state and action spaces. The sub-optimality gap depends on the approximation error $hat{f}-f$, as well as the Lipschitz constant of the corresponding optimal value function. Our approach does not require modeling of the transition probabilities and enjoys the same memory complexity as model-free methods.
6/4/2024
š
Towards Minimax Optimality of Model-based Robust Reinforcement Learning
Pierre Clavier, Erwan Le Pennec, Matthieu Geist
0
0
We study the sample complexity of obtaining an $epsilon$-optimal policy in emph{Robust} discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs), given only access to a generative model of the nominal kernel. This problem is widely studied in the non-robust case, and it is known that any planning approach applied to an empirical MDP estimated with $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^3 mid S midmid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ samples provides an $epsilon$-optimal policy, which is minimax optimal. Results in the robust case are much more scarce. For $sa$- (resp $s$-)rectangular uncertainty sets, the best known sample complexity is $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S mid^2mid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ (resp. $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S mid^2mid A mid^2}{epsilon^2})$), for specific algorithms and when the uncertainty set is based on the total variation (TV), the KL or the Chi-square divergences. In this paper, we consider uncertainty sets defined with an $L_p$-ball (recovering the TV case), and study the sample complexity of emph{any} planning algorithm (with high accuracy guarantee on the solution) applied to an empirical RMDP estimated using the generative model. In the general case, we prove a sample complexity of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S midmid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ for both the $sa$- and $s$-rectangular cases (improvements of $mid S mid$ and $mid S midmid A mid$ respectively). When the size of the uncertainty is small enough, we improve the sample complexity to $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^3 mid S midmid A mid }{epsilon^2})$, recovering the lower-bound for the non-robust case for the first time and a robust lower-bound when the size of the uncertainty is small enough.
6/7/2024
š
Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes
He Wang, Laixi Shi, Yuejie Chi
0
0
In offline reinforcement learning (RL), the absence of active exploration calls for attention on the model robustness to tackle the sim-to-real gap, where the discrepancy between the simulated and deployed environments can significantly undermine the performance of the learned policy. To endow the learned policy with robustness in a sample-efficient manner in the presence of high-dimensional state-action space, this paper considers the sample complexity of distributionally robust linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an uncertainty set characterized by the total variation distance using offline data. We develop a pessimistic model-based algorithm and establish its sample complexity bound under minimal data coverage assumptions, which outperforms prior art by at least $widetilde{O}(d)$, where $d$ is the feature dimension. We further improve the performance guarantee of the proposed algorithm by incorporating a carefully-designed variance estimator.
6/28/2024
š
Achieving $tilde{O}(1/epsilon)$ Sample Complexity for Constrained Markov Decision Process
Jiashuo Jiang, Yinyu Ye
0
0
We consider the reinforcement learning problem for the constrained Markov decision process (CMDP), which plays a central role in satisfying safety or resource constraints in sequential learning and decision-making. In this problem, we are given finite resources and a MDP with unknown transition probabilities. At each stage, we take an action, collecting a reward and consuming some resources, all assumed to be unknown and need to be learned over time. In this work, we take the first step towards deriving optimal problem-dependent guarantees for the CMDP problems. We derive a logarithmic regret bound, which translates into a $O(frac{1}{Deltacdoteps}cdotlog^2(1/eps))$ sample complexity bound, with $Delta$ being a problem-dependent parameter, yet independent of $eps$. Our sample complexity bound improves upon the state-of-art $O(1/eps^2)$ sample complexity for CMDP problems established in the previous literature, in terms of the dependency on $eps$. To achieve this advance, we develop a new framework for analyzing CMDP problems. To be specific, our algorithm operates in the primal space and we resolve the primal LP for the CMDP problem at each period in an online manner, with textit{adaptive} remaining resource capacities. The key elements of our algorithm are: i) a characterization of the instance hardness via LP basis, ii) an eliminating procedure that identifies one optimal basis of the primal LP, and; iii) a resolving procedure that is adaptive to the remaining resources and sticks to the characterized optimal basis.
6/4/2024