Towards Minimax Optimality of Model-based Robust Reinforcement Learning
2302.05372
0
0
🏅
Abstract
We study the sample complexity of obtaining an $epsilon$-optimal policy in emph{Robust} discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs), given only access to a generative model of the nominal kernel. This problem is widely studied in the non-robust case, and it is known that any planning approach applied to an empirical MDP estimated with $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^3 mid S midmid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ samples provides an $epsilon$-optimal policy, which is minimax optimal. Results in the robust case are much more scarce. For $sa$- (resp $s$-)rectangular uncertainty sets, the best known sample complexity is $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S mid^2mid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ (resp. $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S mid^2mid A mid^2}{epsilon^2})$), for specific algorithms and when the uncertainty set is based on the total variation (TV), the KL or the Chi-square divergences. In this paper, we consider uncertainty sets defined with an $L_p$-ball (recovering the TV case), and study the sample complexity of emph{any} planning algorithm (with high accuracy guarantee on the solution) applied to an empirical RMDP estimated using the generative model. In the general case, we prove a sample complexity of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S midmid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ for both the $sa$- and $s$-rectangular cases (improvements of $mid S mid$ and $mid S midmid A mid$ respectively). When the size of the uncertainty is small enough, we improve the sample complexity to $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^3 mid S midmid A mid }{epsilon^2})$, recovering the lower-bound for the non-robust case for the first time and a robust lower-bound when the size of the uncertainty is small enough.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper studies the sample complexity of obtaining an ε-optimal policy in Robust Discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs) using a generative model of the nominal kernel.
- It considers uncertainty sets defined with an L_p-ball, which includes the Total Variation (TV) case.
- The authors analyze the sample complexity of any planning algorithm applied to an empirical RMDP, providing improvements over the best known results.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the challenge of finding a near-optimal policy in a type of decision-making problem called a "Robust Discounted Markov Decision Process" (RMDP). In an RMDP, there is some uncertainty or ambiguity in the environment, which makes the problem more difficult to solve compared to a standard Markov Decision Process (MDP).
The researchers are interested in understanding how much data (or "samples") is required to find a policy that is nearly as good as the best possible policy, when the only information available is a generative model of the "nominal" or average-case environment. This is an important question because in many real-world applications, we may only have access to a simplified model of the environment, rather than the true underlying dynamics.
The paper shows that by using a more general type of uncertainty set, they can improve upon the best previously known sample complexity results for solving RMDPs. Specifically, they provide sample complexity bounds that are better by a factor of the size of the state space and/or action space, compared to the prior state-of-the-art. This means that under certain conditions, they can find a near-optimal policy using fewer samples from the generative model, which is a significant practical advantage.
The key insights are that the researchers were able to leverage the structure of the L_p-ball uncertainty set to derive tighter sample complexity bounds. This represents an important advance in our understanding of the fundamental limits of planning in uncertain environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper studies the sample complexity of obtaining an ε-optimal policy in Robust Discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs), where the transition dynamics are subject to uncertainty. This problem is closely related to the non-robust case, which is well-understood.
For RMDPs with
In this work, the authors consider uncertainty sets defined with an L_p-ball, which includes the TV case as a special instance. They analyze the sample complexity of
The main results are:
- In the general case, they prove a sample complexity of O~(H^4 |S| |A| / ε^2) for both the
sa - ands -rectangular cases, improving the previous best results by factors of |S| and |S||A|, respectively. - When the size of the uncertainty is small enough, they improve the sample complexity further to O~(H^3 |S| |A| / ε^2), recovering the lower-bound for the non-robust case and providing a robust lower-bound.
These results represent a significant advancement in our understanding of the sample complexity of planning in RMDPs, and could have important practical implications for reinforcement learning in uncertain environments.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes valuable contributions to the theoretical understanding of planning in RMDPs, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The analysis assumes access to a generative model of the nominal kernel, which may not always be available in practice. Extending the results to the case of
sample-based planning algorithms would be an important next step. -
The authors focus on the discounted setting, but many real-world applications involve average-reward or other objective functions. Investigating the sample complexity in these alternative settings could provide additional insights.
-
The L_p-ball uncertainty set, while more general than previous work, may still not capture all the nuances of real-world uncertainty. Exploring alternative uncertainty representations, possibly learned from data, could lead to even tighter sample complexity bounds.
-
The analysis assumes that the planning algorithm can find an ε-optimal policy exactly. Relaxing this assumption to allow for approximate solutions could lead to further improvements in the sample complexity.
Overall, the paper represents a significant step forward in our understanding of robust planning in Markov Decision Processes, and the findings could have important implications for the design of practical reinforcement learning algorithms that can operate effectively in uncertain environments.
Conclusion
This paper has made important contributions to the study of sample complexity in Robust Discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs). By considering a more general class of uncertainty sets defined by L_p-balls, the authors were able to derive sample complexity bounds that improve upon the previous state-of-the-art results.
The key insights are that the researchers were able to leverage the structure of the L_p-ball uncertainty set to obtain tighter bounds, leading to reductions in the required number of samples from the generative model. This represents a significant advancement in our theoretical understanding of planning in uncertain environments.
The findings of this paper could have important practical implications for the design of robust reinforcement learning algorithms that can operate effectively in the face of uncertainty. By requiring fewer samples to find near-optimal policies, these algorithms may become more practical and scalable for real-world applications.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the field of decision-making under uncertainty, and the insights developed here could inspire further research into more efficient and reliable planning approaches for complex, dynamic environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
Laixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen, Matthieu Geist, Yuejie Chi
0
0
This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs remained mostly unsettled regardless of the uncertainty set in use. It was unclear if distributional robustness bears any statistical consequences when benchmarked against standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that draws samples based on the nominal MDP, we characterize the sample complexity of RMDPs when the uncertainty set is specified via either the total variation (TV) distance or $chi^2$ divergence. The algorithm studied here is a model-based method called {em distributionally robust value iteration}, which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Somewhat surprisingly, our results uncover that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequence incurred by the robustness requirement depends heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set: in the case w.r.t.~the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs; in the case w.r.t.~the $chi^2$ divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
4/15/2024
📊
Achieving $tilde{O}(1/epsilon)$ Sample Complexity for Constrained Markov Decision Process
Jiashuo Jiang, Yinyu Ye
0
0
We consider the reinforcement learning problem for the constrained Markov decision process (CMDP), which plays a central role in satisfying safety or resource constraints in sequential learning and decision-making. In this problem, we are given finite resources and a MDP with unknown transition probabilities. At each stage, we take an action, collecting a reward and consuming some resources, all assumed to be unknown and need to be learned over time. In this work, we take the first step towards deriving optimal problem-dependent guarantees for the CMDP problems. We derive a logarithmic regret bound, which translates into a $O(frac{1}{Deltacdoteps}cdotlog^2(1/eps))$ sample complexity bound, with $Delta$ being a problem-dependent parameter, yet independent of $eps$. Our sample complexity bound improves upon the state-of-art $O(1/eps^2)$ sample complexity for CMDP problems established in the previous literature, in terms of the dependency on $eps$. To achieve this advance, we develop a new framework for analyzing CMDP problems. To be specific, our algorithm operates in the primal space and we resolve the primal LP for the CMDP problem at each period in an online manner, with textit{adaptive} remaining resource capacities. The key elements of our algorithm are: i) a characterization of the instance hardness via LP basis, ii) an eliminating procedure that identifies one optimal basis of the primal LP, and; iii) a resolving procedure that is adaptive to the remaining resources and sticks to the characterized optimal basis.
6/4/2024
🐍
New!Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes
He Wang, Laixi Shi, Yuejie Chi
0
0
In offline reinforcement learning (RL), the absence of active exploration calls for attention on the model robustness to tackle the sim-to-real gap, where the discrepancy between the simulated and deployed environments can significantly undermine the performance of the learned policy. To endow the learned policy with robustness in a sample-efficient manner in the presence of high-dimensional state-action space, this paper considers the sample complexity of distributionally robust linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an uncertainty set characterized by the total variation distance using offline data. We develop a pessimistic model-based algorithm and establish its sample complexity bound under minimal data coverage assumptions, which outperforms prior art by at least $widetilde{O}(d)$, where $d$ is the feature dimension. We further improve the performance guarantee of the proposed algorithm by incorporating a carefully-designed variance estimator.
6/28/2024
✅
Finding good policies in average-reward Markov Decision Processes without prior knowledge
Adrienne Tuynman, R'emy Degenne, Emilie Kaufmann
0
0
We revisit the identification of an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in average-reward Markov Decision Processes (MDP). In such MDPs, two measures of complexity have appeared in the literature: the diameter, $D$, and the optimal bias span, $H$, which satisfy $Hleq D$. Prior work have studied the complexity of $varepsilon$-optimal policy identification only when a generative model is available. In this case, it is known that there exists an MDP with $D simeq H$ for which the sample complexity to output an $varepsilon$-optimal policy is $Omega(SAD/varepsilon^2)$ where $S$ and $A$ are the sizes of the state and action spaces. Recently, an algorithm with a sample complexity of order $SAH/varepsilon^2$ has been proposed, but it requires the knowledge of $H$. We first show that the sample complexity required to estimate $H$ is not bounded by any function of $S,A$ and $H$, ruling out the possibility to easily make the previous algorithm agnostic to $H$. By relying instead on a diameter estimation procedure, we propose the first algorithm for $(varepsilon,delta)$-PAC policy identification that does not need any form of prior knowledge on the MDP. Its sample complexity scales in $SAD/varepsilon^2$ in the regime of small $varepsilon$, which is near-optimal. In the online setting, our first contribution is a lower bound which implies that a sample complexity polynomial in $H$ cannot be achieved in this setting. Then, we propose an online algorithm with a sample complexity in $SAD^2/varepsilon^2$, as well as a novel approach based on a data-dependent stopping rule that we believe is promising to further reduce this bound.
5/28/2024