SEVD: Synthetic Event-based Vision Dataset for Ego and Fixed Traffic Perception
0
๐
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides LATEX guidelines for author responses in academic paper submissions.
- It covers important considerations such as the length of the response, formatting instructions, and best practices for effectively communicating with reviewers.
- The guidelines aim to help authors craft clear, concise, and impactful responses that address reviewer feedback in a professional manner.
Plain English Explanation
The paper outlines a set of instructions for authors to follow when writing their response to reviewer comments for an academic paper submission. The key focus is on ensuring the response is formatted correctly and conveys the necessary information in a clear, concise way.
Some of the main points covered include:
- Response length: Providing guidance on the appropriate length of the response, typically between 1-2 pages.
- Formatting: Outlining the LATEX formatting requirements, such as using specific document classes, font sizes, and section headings.
- Best practices: Suggesting strategies for effectively addressing reviewer comments, structuring the response, and maintaining a professional tone.
The goal is to help authors craft a response that is easy for reviewers to read and understand, allowing them to quickly grasp the key points and provide valuable feedback.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides detailed guidelines for authors to follow when preparing their response to reviewer comments for an academic paper submission using LATEX.
The main sections covered include:
- Response length: The authors recommend keeping the response to 1-2 pages, providing guidance on how to efficiently address comments within this length constraint.
- Formatting: The paper outlines the specific LATEX formatting requirements, such as using the
articledocument class, 11pt font size, and standard section headings. - Structure and content: The authors suggest a response structure that includes an introduction, addressing each reviewer comment, and a conclusion. They also provide tips on how to effectively communicate with reviewers.
- Figures and references: Guidelines are given for incorporating figures and references into the response, including the use of LATEX commands and citation styles.
- Submission process: The paper provides information on how to submit the final response, including file formats and any additional requirements from the conference or journal.
Critical Analysis
The guidelines provided in this paper are comprehensive and well-structured, addressing the key aspects authors need to consider when crafting their responses to reviewer comments.
One potential limitation is that the guidelines are specific to LATEX formatting, which may not be accessible to all authors, especially those with less technical backgrounds. It would be beneficial if the authors also provided guidance for other common document preparation systems, such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the nuances of effectively communicating with reviewers, such as maintaining a respectful and constructive tone, addressing criticisms directly, and highlighting the significance of the research. While the guidelines touch on these aspects, more in-depth discussion and examples could further improve the utility of the paper.
Overall, the LATEX Guidelines for Author Response provide a solid foundation for authors to produce well-formatted and informative responses, but could be further enhanced by expanding the scope and depth of the recommendations.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive set of guidelines for authors to follow when preparing their response to reviewer comments for academic paper submissions using LATEX.
The guidelines cover key aspects such as response length, formatting requirements, structure and content, and the submission process. By adhering to these guidelines, authors can ensure their responses are clear, concise, and effectively communicate with the reviewers.
The instructions provided in this paper can help authors streamline the response-writing process and increase the likelihood of a successful paper revision and acceptance. This resource can be particularly valuable for early-career researchers or those unfamiliar with the best practices for crafting effective author responses.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐
0
SEVD: Synthetic Event-based Vision Dataset for Ego and Fixed Traffic Perception
Manideep Reddy Aliminati, Bharatesh Chakravarthi, Aayush Atul Verma, Arpitsinh Vaghela, Hua Wei, Xuesong Zhou, Yezhou Yang
Recently, event-based vision sensors have gained attention for autonomous driving applications, as conventional RGB cameras face limitations in handling challenging dynamic conditions. However, the availability of real-world and synthetic event-based vision datasets remains limited. In response to this gap, we present SEVD, a first-of-its-kind multi-view ego, and fixed perception synthetic event-based dataset using multiple dynamic vision sensors within the CARLA simulator. Data sequences are recorded across diverse lighting (noon, nighttime, twilight) and weather conditions (clear, cloudy, wet, rainy, foggy) with domain shifts (discrete and continuous). SEVD spans urban, suburban, rural, and highway scenes featuring various classes of objects (car, truck, van, bicycle, motorcycle, and pedestrian). Alongside event data, SEVD includes RGB imagery, depth maps, optical flow, semantic, and instance segmentation, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of the scene. Furthermore, we evaluate the dataset using state-of-the-art event-based (RED, RVT) and frame-based (YOLOv8) methods for traffic participant detection tasks and provide baseline benchmarks for assessment. Additionally, we conduct experiments to assess the synthetic event-based dataset's generalization capabilities. The dataset is available at https://eventbasedvision.github.io/SEVD
Read more4/24/2024
๐
0
MEVDT: Multi-Modal Event-Based Vehicle Detection and Tracking Dataset
Zaid A. El Shair, Samir A. Rawashdeh
In this data article, we introduce the Multi-Modal Event-based Vehicle Detection and Tracking (MEVDT) dataset. This dataset provides a synchronized stream of event data and grayscale images of traffic scenes, captured using the Dynamic and Active-Pixel Vision Sensor (DAVIS) 240c hybrid event-based camera. MEVDT comprises 63 multi-modal sequences with approximately 13k images, 5M events, 10k object labels, and 85 unique object tracking trajectories. Additionally, MEVDT includes manually annotated ground truth labels $unicode{x2014}$ consisting of object classifications, pixel-precise bounding boxes, and unique object IDs $unicode{x2014}$ which are provided at a labeling frequency of 24 Hz. Designed to advance the research in the domain of event-based vision, MEVDT aims to address the critical need for high-quality, real-world annotated datasets that enable the development and evaluation of object detection and tracking algorithms in automotive environments.
Read more7/31/2024
0
OVOSE: Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation in Event-Based Cameras
Muhammad Rameez Ur Rahman, Jhony H. Giraldo, Indro Spinelli, St'ephane Lathuili`ere, Fabio Galasso
Event cameras, known for low-latency operation and superior performance in challenging lighting conditions, are suitable for sensitive computer vision tasks such as semantic segmentation in autonomous driving. However, challenges arise due to limited event-based data and the absence of large-scale segmentation benchmarks. Current works are confined to closed-set semantic segmentation, limiting their adaptability to other applications. In this paper, we introduce OVOSE, the first Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation algorithm for Event cameras. OVOSE leverages synthetic event data and knowledge distillation from a pre-trained image-based foundation model to an event-based counterpart, effectively preserving spatial context and transferring open-vocabulary semantic segmentation capabilities. We evaluate the performance of OVOSE on two driving semantic segmentation datasets DDD17, and DSEC-Semantic, comparing it with existing conventional image open-vocabulary models adapted for event-based data. Similarly, we compare OVOSE with state-of-the-art methods designed for closed-set settings in unsupervised domain adaptation for event-based semantic segmentation. OVOSE demonstrates superior performance, showcasing its potential for real-world applications. The code is available at https://github.com/ram95d/OVOSE.
Read more8/20/2024
๐งช
0
V2CE: Video to Continuous Events Simulator
Zhongyang Zhang, Shuyang Cui, Kaidong Chai, Haowen Yu, Subhasis Dasgupta, Upal Mahbub, Tauhidur Rahman
Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS)-based solutions have recently garnered significant interest across various computer vision tasks, offering notable benefits in terms of dynamic range, temporal resolution, and inference speed. However, as a relatively nascent vision sensor compared to Active Pixel Sensor (APS) devices such as RGB cameras, DVS suffers from a dearth of ample labeled datasets. Prior efforts to convert APS data into events often grapple with issues such as a considerable domain shift from real events, the absence of quantified validation, and layering problems within the time axis. In this paper, we present a novel method for video-to-events stream conversion from multiple perspectives, considering the specific characteristics of DVS. A series of carefully designed losses helps enhance the quality of generated event voxels significantly. We also propose a novel local dynamic-aware timestamp inference strategy to accurately recover event timestamps from event voxels in a continuous fashion and eliminate the temporal layering problem. Results from rigorous validation through quantified metrics at all stages of the pipeline establish our method unquestionably as the current state-of-the-art (SOTA).
Read more4/30/2024