ShapG: new feature importance method based on the Shapley value
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new feature importance method called ShapG, which is based on the Shapley value
- Provides a comparative analysis of ShapG against other popular feature importance methods
- Demonstrates how ShapG can offer improved explanations for machine learning models
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new technique called ShapG for understanding the importance of different features in machine learning models. Feature importance is a way to determine which input variables have the biggest impact on the model's predictions.
The authors explain that existing feature importance methods, such as SHAP and GNNExplainer, have limitations. ShapG aims to address these limitations by providing a more robust and accurate way to measure feature importance.
The key idea behind ShapG is to use the Shapley value, a concept from game theory, to quantify the contribution of each feature to the model's output. This allows ShapG to capture complex interactions between features, which can be missed by simpler feature importance methods.
The authors demonstrate the advantages of ShapG through experiments on various machine learning tasks, including handling missing data and data valuation and selection. They show that ShapG can provide more informative and reliable explanations of the model's behavior compared to other feature importance methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new feature importance method called ShapG, which is based on the Shapley value from game theory. The Shapley value is a way to fairly distribute the "credit" or importance of a model's output among the input features.
The authors explain that existing feature importance methods, such as SHAP and GNNExplainer, have limitations. SHAP can be computationally expensive, while GNNExplainer is designed specifically for graph neural networks.
ShapG addresses these limitations by using a more efficient algorithm to compute the Shapley values. The authors also show how ShapG can be used for tasks like handling missing data and data valuation and selection.
Through extensive experiments on various datasets and machine learning models, the authors demonstrate that ShapG can provide more informative and reliable feature importance scores compared to other methods. They also discuss the limitations of their approach and suggest areas for future research.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and well-designed feature importance method, ShapG, that addresses some of the limitations of existing techniques. The authors provide a thorough evaluation of ShapG's performance across different tasks and datasets, which strengthens the claims made in the paper.
However, the authors do acknowledge that ShapG can still be computationally expensive for large-scale problems, especially when dealing with a large number of features. This may limit its practical applicability in some real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential biases or fairness concerns that may arise from using feature importance methods like ShapG, which is an important consideration for deployments in high-stakes domains.
Further research could explore ways to improve the computational efficiency of ShapG, as well as investigate its implications for model interpretability and fairness. It would also be valuable to see how ShapG compares to other recent advancements in explainable AI and feature importance methods.
Conclusion
The paper presents a new feature importance method called ShapG, which is based on the Shapley value from game theory. ShapG aims to address the limitations of existing feature importance techniques, such as computational expense and lack of support for certain machine learning tasks.
The authors demonstrate that ShapG can provide more informative and reliable feature importance scores compared to other methods, making it a valuable tool for interpretable machine learning. While ShapG has some computational limitations, the paper represents a significant contribution to the field of explainable AI and could have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of machine learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ShapG: new feature importance method based on the Shapley value
Chi Zhao, Jing Liu, Elena Parilina
With wide application of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it has become particularly important to make decisions of AI systems explainable and transparent. In this paper, we proposed a new Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) method called ShapG (Explanations based on Shapley value for Graphs) for measuring feature importance. ShapG is a model-agnostic global explanation method. At the first stage, it defines an undirected graph based on the dataset, where nodes represent features and edges are added based on calculation of correlation coefficients between features. At the second stage, it calculates an approximated Shapley value by sampling the data taking into account this graph structure. The sampling approach of ShapG allows to calculate the importance of features efficiently, i.e. to reduce computational complexity. Comparison of ShapG with other existing XAI methods shows that it provides more accurate explanations for two examined datasets. We also compared other XAI methods developed based on cooperative game theory with ShapG in running time, and the results show that ShapG exhibits obvious advantages in its running time, which further proves efficiency of ShapG. In addition, extensive experiments demonstrate a wide range of applicability of the ShapG method for explaining complex models. We find ShapG an important tool in improving explainability and transparency of AI systems and believe it can be widely used in various fields.
Read more7/2/2024
✨
0
From SHAP Scores to Feature Importance Scores
Olivier Letoffe, Xuanxiang Huang, Nicholas Asher, Joao Marques-Silva
A central goal of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is to assign relative importance to the features of a Machine Learning (ML) model given some prediction. The importance of this task of explainability by feature attribution is illustrated by the ubiquitous recent use of tools such as SHAP and LIME. Unfortunately, the exact computation of feature attributions, using the game-theoretical foundation underlying SHAP and LIME, can yield manifestly unsatisfactory results, that tantamount to reporting misleading relative feature importance. Recent work targeted rigorous feature attribution, by studying axiomatic aggregations of features based on logic-based definitions of explanations by feature selection. This paper shows that there is an essential relationship between feature attribution and a priori voting power, and that those recently proposed axiomatic aggregations represent a few instantiations of the range of power indices studied in the past. Furthermore, it remains unclear how some of the most widely used power indices might be exploited as feature importance scores (FISs), i.e. the use of power indices in XAI, and which of these indices would be the best suited for the purposes of XAI by feature attribution, namely in terms of not producing results that could be deemed as unsatisfactory. This paper proposes novel desirable properties that FISs should exhibit. In addition, the paper also proposes novel FISs exhibiting the proposed properties. Finally, the paper conducts a rigorous analysis of the best-known power indices in terms of the proposed properties.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach
Jacob Dineen, Don Kridel, Daniel Dolk, David Castillo
A high-velocity paradigm shift towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged in recent years. Highly complex Machine Learning (ML) models have flourished in many tasks of intelligence, and the questions have started to shift away from traditional metrics of validity towards something deeper: What is this model telling me about my data, and how is it arriving at these conclusions? Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. To address these problems, we propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap). We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold. We propose a taxonomy for feature importance methodology, measure alignment, and observe quantifiable similarity amongst explanation models across several datasets.
Read more5/31/2024
🧠
0
Explaining Graph Neural Networks via Structure-aware Interaction Index
Ngoc Bui, Hieu Trung Nguyen, Viet Anh Nguyen, Rex Ying
The Shapley value is a prominent tool for interpreting black-box machine learning models thanks to its strong theoretical foundation. However, for models with structured inputs, such as graph neural networks, existing Shapley-based explainability approaches either focus solely on node-wise importance or neglect the graph structure when perturbing the input instance. This paper introduces the Myerson-Taylor interaction index that internalizes the graph structure into attributing the node values and the interaction values among nodes. Unlike the Shapley-based methods, the Myerson-Taylor index decomposes coalitions into components satisfying a pre-chosen connectivity criterion. We prove that the Myerson-Taylor index is the unique one that satisfies a system of five natural axioms accounting for graph structure and high-order interaction among nodes. Leveraging these properties, we propose Myerson-Taylor Structure-Aware Graph Explainer (MAGE), a novel explainer that uses the second-order Myerson-Taylor index to identify the most important motifs influencing the model prediction, both positively and negatively. Extensive experiments on various graph datasets and models demonstrate that our method consistently provides superior subgraph explanations compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Read more5/24/2024