She Works, He Works: A Curious Exploration of Gender Bias in AI-Generated Imagery
0
📶
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines gender bias in AI-generated imagery of construction workers.
- It analyzes how AI models tend to sexualize female figures and portray male figures as more authoritative and competent.
- The findings underscore AI's potential to mirror and perpetuate societal biases, emphasizing the need for critical engagement with AI-generated content.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how AI-generated images of construction workers show gender bias. It finds that AI models often sexualize female figures and portray male figures as more authoritative and competent.
This suggests that AI can reflect and perpetuate societal biases around gender. The research emphasizes the need to think critically about the content AI generates and its broader impact on how we perceive gender in our culture.
Technical Explanation
The paper conducts an analysis of AI-generated images of construction workers, grounding the work in Griselda Pollock's theories on visual culture and gender. The researchers examine how the AI models portray male and female figures, finding systematic differences.
Female figures are more likely to be sexualized, while male figures are depicted as more authoritative and competent. These biases mirror broader societal stereotypes and have implications for how AI-generated content shapes cultural perceptions of gender.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into gender biases present in AI-generated imagery, an important issue as AI becomes increasingly integrated into creative processes. However, the research is limited to a specific domain (construction workers) and may not fully capture the nuances of gender representation across different contexts.
Further research could explore a wider range of occupations and settings to gain a more comprehensive understanding of how AI models encode and perpetuate gender biases. Longitudinal studies could also shed light on how these biases evolve as AI systems become more advanced.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the troubling tendency of AI models to perpetuate gender stereotypes in their generated imagery. As AI plays a growing role in shaping our visual culture, it is crucial that we critically engage with its outputs and work to ensure they reflect a more equitable and inclusive representation of gender.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📶
0
She Works, He Works: A Curious Exploration of Gender Bias in AI-Generated Imagery
Amalia Foka
This paper examines gender bias in AI-generated imagery of construction workers, highlighting discrepancies in the portrayal of male and female figures. Grounded in Griselda Pollock's theories on visual culture and gender, the analysis reveals that AI models tend to sexualize female figures while portraying male figures as more authoritative and competent. These findings underscore AI's potential to mirror and perpetuate societal biases, emphasizing the need for critical engagement with AI-generated content. The project contributes to discussions on the ethical implications of AI in creative practices and its broader impact on cultural perceptions of gender.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Thinking beyond Bias: Analyzing Multifaceted Impacts and Implications of AI on Gendered Labour
Satyam Mohla, Bishnupriya Bagh, Anupam Guha
Artificial Intelligence with its multifaceted technologies and integral role in global production significantly impacts gender dynamics particularly in gendered labor. This paper emphasizes the need to explore AIs broader impacts on gendered labor beyond its current emphasis on the generation and perpetuation of epistemic biases. We draw attention to how the AI industry as an integral component of the larger economic structure is transforming the nature of work. It is expanding the prevalence of platform based work models and exacerbating job insecurity particularly for women. Of critical concern is the increasing exclusion of women from meaningful engagement in the digital labor force. This issue often overlooked demands urgent attention from the AI research community. Understanding AIs multifaceted role in gendered labor requires a nuanced examination of economic transformation and its implications for gender equity. By shedding light on these intersections this paper aims to stimulate in depth discussions and catalyze targeted actions aimed at mitigating the gender disparities accentuated by AI driven transformations.
Read more6/26/2024
0
AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenization
Nouar AlDahoul, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki
Text-to-image generative AI models such as Stable Diffusion are used daily by millions worldwide. However, the extent to which these models exhibit racial and gender stereotypes is not yet fully understood. Here, we document significant biases in Stable Diffusion across six races, two genders, 32 professions, and eight attributes. Additionally, we examine the degree to which Stable Diffusion depicts individuals of the same race as being similar to one another. This analysis reveals significant racial homogenization, e.g., depicting nearly all middle eastern men as dark-skinned, bearded, and wearing a traditional headdress. We then propose novel debiasing solutions that address the above stereotypes. Finally, using a preregistered experiment, we show that being presented with inclusive AI-generated faces reduces people's racial and gender biases, while being presented with non-inclusive ones increases such biases. This persists regardless of whether the images are labeled as AI-generated. Taken together, our findings emphasize the need to address biases and stereotypes in AI-generated content.
Read more5/13/2024
0
My Kind of Woman: Analysing Gender Stereotypes in AI through The Averageness Theory and EU Law
Miriam Doh, and Anastasia Karagianni
This study delves into gender classification systems, shedding light on the interaction between social stereotypes and algorithmic determinations. Drawing on the averageness theory, which suggests a relationship between a face's attractiveness and the human ability to ascertain its gender, we explore the potential propagation of human bias into artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Utilising the AI model Stable Diffusion 2.1, we have created a dataset containing various connotations of attractiveness to test whether the correlation between attractiveness and accuracy in gender classification observed in human cognition persists within AI. Our findings indicate that akin to human dynamics, AI systems exhibit variations in gender classification accuracy based on attractiveness, mirroring social prejudices and stereotypes in their algorithmic decisions. This discovery underscores the critical need to consider the impacts of human perceptions on data collection and highlights the necessity for a multidisciplinary and intersectional approach to AI development and AI data training. By incorporating cognitive psychology and feminist legal theory, we examine how data used for AI training can foster gender diversity and fairness under the scope of the AI Act and GDPR, reaffirming how psychological and feminist legal theories can offer valuable insights for ensuring the protection of gender equality and non-discrimination in AI systems.
Read more7/26/2024