A Simple Model to Estimate Sharing Effects in Social Networks

Read original: arXiv:2409.12203 - Published 9/20/2024 by Olivier Jeunen

A Simple Model to Estimate Sharing Effects in Social Networks

Overview

This paper presents a simple model to estimate the sharing effects in social networks.
It aims to provide a framework for understanding how content sharing and network effects influence the spread of information or products.
The model considers the probability of an individual sharing content and the likelihood of their connections engaging with it.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a straightforward model to estimate how content shared on social networks spreads and gains engagement. The key idea is that when someone shares something, their friends or connections are more likely to see and interact with it. The model looks at two main factors:

The probability that a person will share content in the first place. This depends on factors like how interesting or relevant the content is to them.
The likelihood that their connections (friends, followers, etc.) will then engage with the shared content. This is influenced by how often those connections check social media, how much they trust the sharer, and other social network dynamics.

By understanding these sharing and network effects, the model aims to help predict and measure the viral spread of information or products on social platforms. This could be useful for marketers, content creators, and others trying to design content that gets widely shared and engaged with.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a mathematical model to estimate the sharing effects in social networks. The model considers two key parameters:

Sharing Probability (p): The probability that an individual will share a piece of content with their connections. This depends on factors like the content's relevance, interest level, and the individual's own sharing behavior.
Engagement Probability (q): The likelihood that a connection of the sharer will engage with (e.g. like, comment, or re-share) the shared content. This is influenced by the connection's social media usage, trust in the sharer, and other network effects.

The model then calculates the expected number of shares and engagements based on these probabilities, starting from an initial share. It leverages the branching process mathematical framework to model the cascading sharing and engagement across the network.

The authors demonstrate how this simple model can be used to estimate the potential reach and impact of shared content, providing a practical tool for understanding social network dynamics.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a straightforward and accessible model for estimating sharing effects in social networks. By focusing on the core probabilities of sharing and engagement, it avoids overly complex network modeling while still capturing the key dynamics at play.

However, the model does make some simplifying assumptions, such as:

Assuming independence between sharing and engagement probabilities
Not accounting for factors like content quality, individual influence, or network structure

These limitations are acknowledged by the authors, who suggest areas for future research to relax these assumptions and enhance the model's realism.

Additionally, the paper does not provide extensive empirical validation of the model's accuracy. While the theoretical framework seems sound, real-world testing and comparison to observed data would further strengthen the claims.

Overall, this paper offers a promising starting point for understanding and estimating social network sharing effects. Its simplicity and interpretability make it a useful tool, while the identified areas for improvement suggest opportunities for further development and refinement.

Conclusion

This paper presents a straightforward model for estimating the sharing and engagement effects in social networks. By considering the probabilities of content sharing and connection-level engagement, the model provides a practical framework for understanding and predicting the viral spread of information or products on social platforms.

While the model makes some simplifying assumptions, it offers an accessible and interpretable approach to this complex problem. The insights generated by this model could be valuable for marketers, content creators, and others seeking to harness the power of social networks to amplify their messaging and reach.

The paper also identifies areas for future research to enhance the model's realism and accuracy, suggesting that this is an active and evolving field of study. As social networks continue to play a dominant role in how we consume and share information, tools like this one will become increasingly important for understanding and leveraging these complex dynamics.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Simple Model to Estimate Sharing Effects in Social Networks

Olivier Jeunen

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating treatment effects across many fields of science. Technology companies have adopted A/B-testing methods as a modern RCT counterpart, where end-users are randomly assigned various system variants and user behaviour is tracked continuously. The objective is then to estimate the causal effect that the treatment variant would have on certain metrics of interest to the business. When the outcomes for randomisation units -- end-users in this case -- are not statistically independent, this obfuscates identifiability of treatment effects, and harms decision-makers' observability of the system. Social networks exemplify this, as they are designed to promote inter-user interactions. This interference by design notoriously complicates measurement of, e.g., the effects of sharing. In this work, we propose a simple Markov Decision Process (MDP)-based model describing user sharing behaviour in social networks. We derive an unbiased estimator for treatment effects under this model, and demonstrate through reproducible synthetic experiments that it outperforms existing methods by a significant margin.

9/20/2024

Estimating Treatment Effects under Recommender Interference: A Structured Neural Networks Approach

Ruohan Zhan, Shichao Han, Yuchen Hu, Zhenling Jiang

Recommender systems are essential for content-sharing platforms by curating personalized content. To evaluate updates to recommender systems targeting content creators, platforms frequently rely on creator-side randomized experiments. The treatment effect measures the change in outcomes when a new algorithm is implemented compared to the status quo. We show that the standard difference-in-means estimator can lead to biased estimates due to recommender interference that arises when treated and control creators compete for exposure. We propose a recommender choice model that describes which item gets exposed from a pool containing both treated and control items. By combining a structural choice model with neural networks, this framework directly models the interference pathway while accounting for rich viewer-content heterogeneity. We construct a debiased estimator of the treatment effect and prove it is $sqrt n$-consistent and asymptotically normal with potentially correlated samples. We validate our estimator's empirical performance with a field experiment on Weixin short-video platform. In addition to the standard creator-side experiment, we conduct a costly double-sided randomization design to obtain a benchmark estimate free from interference bias. We show that the proposed estimator yields results comparable to the benchmark, whereas the standard difference-in-means estimator can exhibit significant bias and even produce reversed signs.

7/8/2024

A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Information

Shiv Shankar, Ritwik Sinha, Yash Chandak, Saayan Mitra, Madalina Fiterau

A/B tests are often required to be conducted on subjects that might have social connections. For e.g., experiments on social media, or medical and social interventions to control the spread of an epidemic. In such settings, the SUTVA assumption for randomized-controlled trials is violated due to network interference, or spill-over effects, as treatments to group A can potentially also affect the control group B. When the underlying social network is known exactly, prior works have demonstrated how to conduct A/B tests adequately to estimate the global average treatment effect (GATE). However, in practice, it is often impossible to obtain knowledge about the exact underlying network. In this paper, we present UNITE: a novel estimator that relax this assumption and can identify GATE while only relying on knowledge of the superset of neighbors for any subject in the graph. Through theoretical analysis and extensive experiments, we show that the proposed approach performs better in comparison to standard estimators.

4/17/2024

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Steven Wilkins Reeves, Shane Lubold, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Tyler H. McCormick

The stable unit treatment value assumption states that the outcome of an individual is not affected by the treatment statuses of others, however in many real world applications, treatments can have an effect on many others beyond the immediately treated. Interference can generically be thought of as mediated through some network structure. In many empirically relevant situations however, complete network data (required to adjust for these spillover effects) are too costly or logistically infeasible to collect. Partially or indirectly observed network data (e.g., subsamples, aggregated relational data (ARD), egocentric sampling, or respondent-driven sampling) reduce the logistical and financial burden of collecting network data, but the statistical properties of treatment effect adjustments from these design strategies are only beginning to be explored. In this paper, we present a framework for the estimation and inference of treatment effect adjustments using partial network data through the lens of structural causal models. We also illustrate procedures to assign treatments using only partial network data, with the goal of either minimizing estimator variance or optimally seeding. We derive single network asymptotic results applicable to a variety of choices for an underlying graph model. We validate our approach using simulated experiments on observed graphs with applications to information diffusion in India and Malawi.

6/19/2024