Sampling-based Pareto Optimization for Chance-constrained Monotone Submodular Problems

Read original: arXiv:2404.11907 - Published 4/19/2024 by Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann
Total Score

0

Sampling-based Pareto Optimization for Chance-constrained Monotone Submodular Problems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a sampling-based approach for solving chance-constrained monotone submodular optimization problems
  • Introduces a fast Pareto optimization algorithm that can efficiently find a set of high-quality solutions
  • Leverages adaptive sliding-selection to ensure diverse and high-performing solutions

Plain English Explanation

This paper addresses the challenge of optimizing chance-constrained submodular problems, which arise in various applications such as sensor placement and budget allocation. In these problems, the goal is to find a set of solutions that perform well on multiple objectives while satisfying a probabilistic constraint.

The researchers propose a sampling-based approach to efficiently solve these problems. Their algorithm generates a set of diverse, high-performing solutions by iteratively updating a Pareto front. The key innovation is the use of an "adaptive sliding-selection" mechanism, which ensures that the solutions on the Pareto front are both diverse and of high quality.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments, showing that it can outperform existing methods in terms of solution quality and runtime, especially for large-scale problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a sampling-based Pareto optimization algorithm for solving chance-constrained monotone submodular problems. The key components of the approach are:

  1. Sampling-based Evaluation: Instead of directly evaluating the objectives and constraints, the algorithm uses a sampling-based approach to estimate their values. This allows for efficient optimization, especially when the exact function evaluations are computationally expensive.

  2. Adaptive Sliding-Selection: The algorithm maintains a Pareto front of candidate solutions and iteratively updates it using an "adaptive sliding-selection" mechanism. This mechanism ensures that the solutions on the Pareto front are both diverse and high-performing.

  3. Theoretical Guarantees: The authors provide theoretical analysis of their algorithm, showing that it can achieve a constant-factor approximation guarantee for the chance-constrained submodular optimization problem.

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, particularly in large-scale settings where existing methods struggle.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and efficient approach for solving chance-constrained submodular optimization problems, which have important practical applications. The use of sampling-based evaluation and the adaptive sliding-selection mechanism are key innovations that allow the algorithm to scale well and find diverse, high-quality solutions.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on the submodularity and monotonicity assumptions of the underlying objectives. While these assumptions hold in many real-world scenarios, there may be applications where the objectives do not satisfy these properties, and the performance of the algorithm may degrade.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the trade-offs between solution diversity and performance in-depth. It would be interesting to see how the algorithm's performance and the Pareto front's characteristics change as the relative importance of these two factors is varied.

Conclusion

This paper presents a sampling-based Pareto optimization algorithm for solving chance-constrained monotone submodular problems. The key ideas include the use of efficient sampling-based evaluation and an adaptive sliding-selection mechanism to maintain a diverse set of high-quality solutions.

The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, particularly in large-scale settings. This research contributes to the broader field of multi-objective optimization, where finding diverse and high-performing solutions is crucial in many real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Sampling-based Pareto Optimization for Chance-constrained Monotone Submodular Problems
Total Score

0

Sampling-based Pareto Optimization for Chance-constrained Monotone Submodular Problems

Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann

Recently surrogate functions based on the tail inequalities were developed to evaluate the chance constraints in the context of evolutionary computation and several Pareto optimization algorithms using these surrogates were successfully applied in optimizing chance-constrained monotone submodular problems. However, the difference in performance between algorithms using the surrogates and those employing the direct sampling-based evaluation remains unclear. Within the paper, a sampling-based method is proposed to directly evaluate the chance constraint. Furthermore, to address the problems with more challenging settings, an enhanced GSEMO algorithm integrated with an adaptive sliding window, called ASW-GSEMO, is introduced. In the experiments, the ASW-GSEMO employing the sampling-based approach is tested on the chance-constrained version of the maximum coverage problem with different settings. Its results are compared with those from other algorithms using different surrogate functions. The experimental findings indicate that the ASW-GSEMO with the sampling-based evaluation approach outperforms other algorithms, highlighting that the performances of algorithms using different evaluation methods are comparable. Additionally, the behaviors of ASW-GSEMO are visualized to explain the distinctions between it and the algorithms utilizing the surrogate functions.

Read more

4/19/2024

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions
Total Score

0

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions

Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann

Variants of the GSEMO algorithm using multi-objective formulations have been successfully analyzed and applied to optimize chance-constrained submodular functions. However, due to the effect of the increasing population size of the GSEMO algorithm considered in these studies from the algorithms, the approach becomes ineffective if the number of trade-offs obtained grows quickly during the optimization run. In this paper, we apply the sliding-selection approach introduced in [21] to the optimization of chance-constrained monotone submodular functions. We theoretically analyze the resulting SW-GSEMO algorithm which successfully limits the population size as a key factor that impacts the runtime and show that this allows it to obtain better runtime guarantees than the best ones currently known for the GSEMO. In our experimental study, we compare the performance of the SW-GSEMO to the GSEMO and NSGA-II on the maximum coverage problem under the chance constraint and show that the SW-GSEMO outperforms the other two approaches in most cases. In order to get additional insights into the optimization behavior of SW-GSEMO, we visualize the selection behavior of SW-GSEMO during its optimization process and show it beats other algorithms to obtain the highest quality of solution in variable instances.

Read more

8/9/2024

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem
Total Score

0

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem

Kokila Kasuni Perera, Aneta Neumann

Evolutionary algorithms are particularly effective for optimisation problems with dynamic and stochastic components. We propose multi-objective evolutionary approaches for the knapsack problem with stochastic profits under static and dynamic weight constraints. The chance-constrained problem model allows us to effectively capture the stochastic profits and associate a confidence level to the solutions' profits. We consider a bi-objective formulation that maximises expected profit and minimises variance, which allows optimising the problem independent of a specific confidence level on the profit. We derive a three-objective formulation by relaxing the weight constraint into an additional objective. We consider the GSEMO algorithm with standard and a sliding window-based parent selection to evaluate the objective formulations. Moreover, we modify fitness formulations and algorithms for the dynamic problem variant to store some infeasible solutions to cater to future changes. We conduct experimental investigations on both problems using the proposed problem formulations and algorithms. Our results show that three-objective approaches outperform approaches that use bi-objective formulations, and they further improve when GSEMO uses sliding window selection.

Read more

4/15/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Evolving Reliable Differentiating Constraints for the Chance-constrained Maximum Coverage Problem

Saba Sadeghi Ahouei, Jacob de Nobel, Aneta Neumann, Thomas Back, Frank Neumann

Chance-constrained problems involve stochastic components in the constraints which can be violated with a small probability. We investigate the impact of different types of chance constraints on the performance of iterative search algorithms and study the classical maximum coverage problem in graphs with chance constraints. Our goal is to evolve reliable chance constraint settings for a given graph where the performance of algorithms differs significantly not just in expectation but with high confidence. This allows to better learn and understand how different types of algorithms can deal with different types of constraint settings and supports automatic algorithm selection. We develop an evolutionary algorithm that provides sets of chance constraints that differentiate the performance of two stochastic search algorithms with high confidence. We initially use traditional approximation ratio as the fitness function of (1+1)~EA to evolve instances, which shows inadequacy to generate reliable instances. To address this issue, we introduce a new measure to calculate the performance difference for two algorithms, which considers variances of performance ratios. Our experiments show that our approach is highly successful in solving the instability issue of the performance ratios and leads to evolving reliable sets of chance constraints with significantly different performance for various types of algorithms.

Read more

5/30/2024