Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs
0
❗
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced significantly, offering powerful vision-language understanding capabilities.
- However, these models often inherit severe social biases from their training datasets, leading to unfair predictions based on attributes like race and gender.
- This paper addresses the issue of social biases in MLLMs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on addressing the problem of social biases in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). These advanced AI models can understand both vision and language, but they often pick up biases from the data used to train them. This can lead to the models making unfair predictions based on attributes like race or gender.
To tackle this issue, the researchers introduce a new Counterfactual dataset with Multiple Social Concepts (CMSC). This dataset provides a more diverse and extensive training set compared to existing datasets, helping to counteract the biases.
The researchers also propose an Anti-Stereotype Debiasing (ASD) strategy. This method works by modifying the MLLM training process, adjusting the loss function, and improving the data sampling methods to reduce biases while maintaining the models' original performance.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a comprehensive Counterfactual dataset with Multiple Social Concepts (CMSC), which provides a more diverse and extensive training set compared to existing datasets. This helps to address the issue of social biases in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs).
The researchers also propose an Anti-Stereotype Debiasing (ASD) strategy. This method works by revisiting the MLLM training process, rescaling the autoregressive loss function, and improving data sampling methods to counteract biases. Through extensive experiments on various MLLMs, the CMSC dataset and ASD method demonstrate a significant reduction in social biases while maintaining the models' original performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the limitations of the Counterfactual dataset with Multiple Social Concepts (CMSC) and the Anti-Stereotype Debiasing (ASD) strategy. For example, the dataset may not fully capture the complexity of real-world social biases, and the debiasing method may not be applicable to all types of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs).
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical concerns around the use of these debiased models, such as the risk of perpetuating other forms of bias or the challenges of ensuring transparency and accountability. Further research is needed to explore these issues more deeply.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant step forward in addressing the issue of social biases in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). The introduction of the Counterfactual dataset with Multiple Social Concepts (CMSC) and the Anti-Stereotype Debiasing (ASD) strategy demonstrate a promising approach to reducing biases while maintaining model performance. However, further research is needed to address the remaining challenges and ensure the ethical deployment of these debiased models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
❗
0
Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs
Harry Cheng, Yangyang Guo, Qingpei Guo, Ming Yang, Tian Gan, Liqiang Nie
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced significantly, offering powerful vision-language understanding capabilities. However, these models often inherit severe social biases from their training datasets, leading to unfair predictions based on attributes like race and gender. This paper addresses the issue of social biases in MLLMs by i) Introducing a comprehensive Counterfactual dataset with Multiple Social Concepts (CMSC), which provides a more diverse and extensive training set compared to existing datasets. ii) Proposing an Anti-Stereotype Debiasing strategy (ASD). Our method works by revisiting the MLLM training process, rescaling the autoregressive loss function, and improving data sampling methods to counteract biases. Through extensive experiments on various MLLMs, our CMSC dataset and ASD method demonstrate a significant reduction in social biases while maintaining the models' original performance.
Read more8/14/2024
0
A Multi-LLM Debiasing Framework
Deonna M. Owens, Ryan A. Rossi, Sungchul Kim, Tong Yu, Franck Dernoncourt, Xiang Chen, Ruiyi Zhang, Jiuxiang Gu, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Nedim Lipka
Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools with the potential to benefit society immensely, yet, they have demonstrated biases that perpetuate societal inequalities. Despite significant advancements in bias mitigation techniques using data augmentation, zero-shot prompting, and model fine-tuning, biases continuously persist, including subtle biases that may elude human detection. Recent research has shown a growing interest in multi-LLM approaches, which have been demonstrated to be effective in improving the quality of reasoning and factuality in LLMs. Building on this approach, we propose a novel multi-LLM debiasing framework aimed at reducing bias in LLMs. Our work is the first to introduce and evaluate two distinct approaches within this framework for debiasing LLMs: a centralized method, where the conversation is facilitated by a single central LLM, and a decentralized method, where all models communicate directly. Our findings reveal that our multi-LLM framework significantly reduces bias in LLMs, outperforming the baseline method across several social groups.
Read more9/24/2024
💬
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024
0
MM-Soc: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models in Social Media Platforms
Yiqiao Jin, Minje Choi, Gaurav Verma, Jindong Wang, Srijan Kumar
Social media platforms are hubs for multimodal information exchange, encompassing text, images, and videos, making it challenging for machines to comprehend the information or emotions associated with interactions in online spaces. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a promising solution to these challenges, yet they struggle to accurately interpret human emotions and complex content such as misinformation. This paper introduces MM-Soc, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' understanding of multimodal social media content. MM-Soc compiles prominent multimodal datasets and incorporates a novel large-scale YouTube tagging dataset, targeting a range of tasks from misinformation detection, hate speech detection, and social context generation. Through our exhaustive evaluation on ten size-variants of four open-source MLLMs, we have identified significant performance disparities, highlighting the need for advancements in models' social understanding capabilities. Our analysis reveals that, in a zero-shot setting, various types of MLLMs generally exhibit difficulties in handling social media tasks. However, MLLMs demonstrate performance improvements post fine-tuning, suggesting potential pathways for improvement. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/claws-lab/MMSoc.git.
Read more9/4/2024