Soft Begging: Modular and Efficient Shielding of LLMs against Prompt Injection and Jailbreaking based on Prompt Tuning
0
↗️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach called "Soft Begging" to shield large language models (LLMs) against prompt injection and jailbreaking attacks.
- The key idea is to use prompt tuning to train the LLM to gently refuse unsafe prompts, rather than blindly accepting them.
- This modular and efficient shielding technique aims to maintain the flexibility and capabilities of the LLM while enhancing its security.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a solution called "Soft Begging" to protect large language models (LLMs) from two major threats: prompt injection and jailbreaking.
Prompt injection refers to attackers trying to trick the LLM into producing harmful or undesirable outputs by carefully crafting the input prompts. Jailbreaking, on the other hand, involves exploiting vulnerabilities in the LLM's training or deployment to bypass its intended constraints and limitations.
The key innovation in "Soft Begging" is to use a technique called "prompt tuning" to train the LLM to gently refuse unsafe prompts, rather than just accepting them blindly. The LLM is taught to politely explain why it cannot carry out certain requests, rather than simply doing what the prompt asks.
This approach aims to maintain the LLM's flexibility and capabilities while enhancing its security. It's a modular and efficient solution that can be applied to different LLMs without requiring major architectural changes.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel shielding technique called "Soft Begging" to protect large language models (LLMs) against prompt injection and jailbreaking attacks. The key idea is to use prompt tuning to train the LLM to politely refuse unsafe prompts, rather than blindly accepting them.
The authors first provide background on the two main attack vectors targeting LLMs: prompt injection and jailbreaking. Prompt injection involves crafting prompts to trick the LLM into producing harmful outputs, while jailbreaking exploits vulnerabilities to bypass the LLM's intended constraints.
To address these threats, the authors propose the "Soft Begging" approach, which trains the LLM to gently refuse unsafe prompts instead of just accepting them. The LLM is taught to politely explain why it cannot carry out certain requests, maintaining its flexibility while enhancing its security.
The paper describes the prompt tuning process in detail, including the use of a safety classifier to identify risky prompts and the training of the LLM to provide appropriate responses. The authors also discuss the modular and efficient nature of their solution, which can be applied to different LLMs without requiring major architectural changes.
Critical Analysis
The "Soft Begging" approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution to the pressing challenge of protecting large language models (LLMs) against prompt injection and jailbreaking attacks. By using prompt tuning to train the LLM to politely refuse unsafe prompts, the authors have developed a modular and efficient shielding technique that maintains the model's flexibility while enhancing its security.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it may not be able to handle all possible types of prompt injection or jailbreaking attacks. The authors acknowledge that their solution is not a panacea and that further research is needed to address more advanced and sophisticated attack vectors.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed evaluation of the effectiveness of the "Soft Begging" approach, nor does it compare it to other proposed defense mechanisms. Further empirical analysis and benchmarking against alternative solutions would be valuable to fully assess the merits and limitations of this approach.
Despite these caveats, the "Soft Begging" technique represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to safeguard LLMs against malicious attacks. By encouraging the LLM to engage in a more nuanced and interactive dialogue with users, the approach aligns with the broader goal of developing AI systems that are not only capable, but also responsible and trustworthy.
Conclusion
The "Soft Begging" approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution to the critical challenge of shielding large language models (LLMs) against prompt injection and jailbreaking attacks. By using prompt tuning to train the LLM to politely refuse unsafe prompts, the authors have developed a modular and efficient technique that maintains the model's flexibility while enhancing its security.
While the paper acknowledges that further research is needed to address more advanced attack vectors, the "Soft Begging" approach represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to develop responsible and trustworthy AI systems. By encouraging a more nuanced and interactive dialogue between the LLM and its users, this solution aligns with the broader goal of creating AI that can be safely and reliably deployed in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
0
Soft Begging: Modular and Efficient Shielding of LLMs against Prompt Injection and Jailbreaking based on Prompt Tuning
Simon Ostermann, Kevin Baum, Christoph Endres, Julia Masloh, Patrick Schramowski
Prompt injection (both direct and indirect) and jailbreaking are now recognized as significant issues for large language models (LLMs), particularly due to their potential for harm in application-integrated contexts. This extended abstract explores a novel approach to protecting LLMs from such attacks, termed soft begging. This method involves training soft prompts to counteract the effects of corrupted prompts on the LLM's output. We provide an overview of prompt injections and jailbreaking, introduce the theoretical basis of the soft begging technique, and discuss an evaluation of its effectiveness.
Read more7/8/2024
💬
0
Do Anything Now: Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models
Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen, Yang Zhang
The misuse of large language models (LLMs) has drawn significant attention from the general public and LLM vendors. One particular type of adversarial prompt, known as jailbreak prompt, has emerged as the main attack vector to bypass the safeguards and elicit harmful content from LLMs. In this paper, employing our new framework JailbreakHub, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of 1,405 jailbreak prompts spanning from December 2022 to December 2023. We identify 131 jailbreak communities and discover unique characteristics of jailbreak prompts and their major attack strategies, such as prompt injection and privilege escalation. We also observe that jailbreak prompts increasingly shift from online Web communities to prompt-aggregation websites and 28 user accounts have consistently optimized jailbreak prompts over 100 days. To assess the potential harm caused by jailbreak prompts, we create a question set comprising 107,250 samples across 13 forbidden scenarios. Leveraging this dataset, our experiments on six popular LLMs show that their safeguards cannot adequately defend jailbreak prompts in all scenarios. Particularly, we identify five highly effective jailbreak prompts that achieve 0.95 attack success rates on ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and GPT-4, and the earliest one has persisted online for over 240 days. We hope that our study can facilitate the research community and LLM vendors in promoting safer and regulated LLMs.
Read more5/16/2024
🤷
0
Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs
Fan Liu, Zhao Xu, Hao Liu
Although safely enhanced Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in tackling various complex tasks in a zero-shot manner, they remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, particularly the unknown jailbreak attack. To enhance LLMs' generalized defense capabilities, we propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework, which generates adversarial prompts to explore worst-case scenarios by optimizing datasets containing pairs of adversarial prompts and their safe responses. In the first stage, we introduce the hierarchical meta-universal adversarial prompt learning to efficiently and effectively generate token-level adversarial prompts. In the second stage, we propose the automatic adversarial prompt learning to iteratively refine semantic-level adversarial prompts, further enhancing LLM's defense capabilities. We conducted comprehensive experiments on three widely used jailbreak datasets, comparing our framework with six defense baselines under five representative attack scenarios. The results underscore the superiority of our proposed methods. Furthermore, our adversarial tuning framework exhibits empirical generalizability across various attack strategies and target LLMs, highlighting its potential as a transferable defense mechanism.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, Yige Li, Ye Zhang, Jun Sun
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications. Despite their impressive performance, recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts even when aligned via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback or supervised fine-tuning. While existing defense methods focus on either detecting harmful prompts or reducing the likelihood of harmful responses through various means, defending LLMs against jailbreak attacks based on the inner mechanisms of LLMs remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate how LLMs response to harmful prompts and propose a novel defense method termed textbf{L}ayer-specific textbf{Ed}iting (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Through LED, we reveal that several critical textit{safety layers} exist among the early layers of LLMs. We then show that realigning these safety layers (and some selected additional layers) with the decoded safe response from selected target layers can significantly improve the alignment of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Extensive experiments across various LLMs (e.g., Llama2, Mistral) show the effectiveness of LED, which effectively defends against jailbreak attacks while maintaining performance on benign prompts. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/ledllm/ledllm}.
Read more6/17/2024