Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs
2406.06622
0
0
🤷
Abstract
Although safely enhanced Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in tackling various complex tasks in a zero-shot manner, they remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, particularly the unknown jailbreak attack. To enhance LLMs' generalized defense capabilities, we propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework, which generates adversarial prompts to explore worst-case scenarios by optimizing datasets containing pairs of adversarial prompts and their safe responses. In the first stage, we introduce the hierarchical meta-universal adversarial prompt learning to efficiently and effectively generate token-level adversarial prompts. In the second stage, we propose the automatic adversarial prompt learning to iteratively refine semantic-level adversarial prompts, further enhancing LLM's defense capabilities. We conducted comprehensive experiments on three widely used jailbreak datasets, comparing our framework with six defense baselines under five representative attack scenarios. The results underscore the superiority of our proposed methods. Furthermore, our adversarial tuning framework exhibits empirical generalizability across various attack strategies and target LLMs, highlighting its potential as a transferable defense mechanism.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Researchers propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework to enhance the generalized defense capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, particularly unknown attacks.
- The framework involves generating adversarial prompts to explore worst-case scenarios and optimize datasets containing adversarial prompts and their safe responses.
- The researchers introduce Hierarchical Meta-Universal Adversarial Prompt Learning to efficiently generate token-level adversarial prompts and Automatic Adversarial Prompt Learning to iteratively refine semantic-level adversarial prompts.
- Comprehensive experiments on three jailbreak datasets show the superiority of the proposed methods over six defense baselines across five attack scenarios.
- The adversarial tuning framework demonstrates empirical generalizability across various attack strategies and target LLMs, highlighting its potential as a transferable defense mechanism.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can tackle a wide range of complex tasks, often without specific training. However, these models can be vulnerable to "jailbreak" attacks, where the model is coerced into producing unsafe or unintended outputs.
To address this issue, the researchers have developed a two-stage framework that aims to strengthen the defenses of LLMs against jailbreak attacks, even those that are unknown or unexpected.
The first stage involves generating "adversarial prompts" - carefully crafted inputs that can expose weaknesses in the LLM. By optimizing a dataset of these adversarial prompts and their safe responses, the researchers can help the LLM learn to better recognize and resist such attacks.
The second stage refines these adversarial prompts, further improving the LLM's ability to identify and respond appropriately to potential jailbreak attempts.
Through extensive testing on several jailbreak datasets, the researchers have shown that their framework outperforms other proposed defense methods across a variety of attack scenarios. Importantly, the framework also demonstrates the ability to generalize to different types of attacks and language models, suggesting it could be a versatile and effective defense mechanism.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework to enhance the generalized defense capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks.
In the first stage, the researchers introduce the Hierarchical Meta-Universal Adversarial Prompt Learning approach, which efficiently generates token-level adversarial prompts that can expose weaknesses in the LLM. This is done by optimizing a dataset containing pairs of adversarial prompts and their safe responses.
The second stage involves the Automatic Adversarial Prompt Learning method, which iteratively refines the semantic-level adversarial prompts to further strengthen the LLM's defense capabilities.
The researchers conducted comprehensive experiments on three widely used jailbreak datasets, comparing their framework with six defense baselines under five representative attack scenarios. The results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed methods over the baselines, as detailed in the Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks and Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models papers.
Importantly, the researchers' adversarial tuning framework exhibits empirical generalizability across various attack strategies and target LLMs, highlighting its potential as a transferable defense mechanism.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have presented a comprehensive and well-designed framework for enhancing the defense capabilities of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. The two-stage approach, involving the generation of adversarial prompts and their iterative refinement, is a thoughtful and systematic way to explore and address potential vulnerabilities in these models.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations of the proposed methods. For example, it would be helpful to understand the computational and resource requirements of the framework, as well as any potential scalability issues when applying it to larger or more complex language models.
Additionally, the researchers mention the "unknown jailbreak attack" as a key challenge, but it is unclear how well the framework would perform against truly novel or unpredictable attack scenarios. Further research may be needed to fully assess the robustness and generalizability of the proposed defense mechanisms.
Overall, the researchers have made a valuable contribution to the field of LLM security and safety. Their work provides a solid foundation for continued exploration and refinement of techniques to protect these powerful AI systems against malicious attacks and unintended behaviors.
Conclusion
The researchers have proposed a innovative two-stage adversarial tuning framework to enhance the generalized defense capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, including unknown attacks. By generating and refining adversarial prompts, the framework helps LLMs learn to better recognize and resist such attacks.
Comprehensive experiments have demonstrated the superiority of the researchers' methods over existing defense baselines across a variety of attack scenarios. Importantly, the framework has also shown the ability to generalize across different attack strategies and target LLMs, suggesting its potential as a transferable and robust defense mechanism.
While the paper does not address all potential limitations, the researchers have made a significant contribution to the field of LLM security and safety. Their work lays the groundwork for further advancements in protecting these powerful AI systems from malicious attacks and unintended behaviors, which will be crucial as LLMs continue to play an increasingly important role in our lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
Fight Back Against Jailbreaking via Prompt Adversarial Tuning
Yichuan Mo, Yuji Wang, Zeming Wei, Yisen Wang
0
0
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved tremendous success in various applications, they are also susceptible to jailbreak attacks. Several primary defense strategies have been proposed to protect LLMs from producing harmful information, mostly with a particular focus on harmful content filtering or heuristical defensive prompt designs. However, how to achieve intrinsic robustness through the prompts remains an open problem. In this paper, motivated by adversarial training paradigms for achieving reliable robustness, we propose an approach named Prompt Adversarial Tuning (PAT) that trains a prompt control attached to the user prompt as a guard prefix. To achieve our defense goal whilst maintaining natural performance, we optimize the control prompt with both adversarial and benign prompts. Comprehensive experiments show that our method is effective against both black-box and white-box attacks, reducing the success rate of advanced attacks to nearly 0 while maintaining the model's utility on the benign task. The proposed defense strategy incurs only negligible computational overhead, charting a new perspective for future explorations in LLM security. Our code is available at https://github.com/rain152/PAT.
6/11/2024
🤔
AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs
Anselm Paulus, Arman Zharmagambetov, Chuan Guo, Brandon Amos, Yuandong Tian
0
0
While recently Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable successes, they are vulnerable to certain jailbreaking attacks that lead to generation of inappropriate or harmful content. Manual red-teaming requires finding adversarial prompts that cause such jailbreaking, e.g. by appending a suffix to a given instruction, which is inefficient and time-consuming. On the other hand, automatic adversarial prompt generation often leads to semantically meaningless attacks that can easily be detected by perplexity-based filters, may require gradient information from the TargetLLM, or do not scale well due to time-consuming discrete optimization processes over the token space. In this paper, we present a novel method that uses another LLM, called the AdvPrompter, to generate human-readable adversarial prompts in seconds, $sim800times$ faster than existing optimization-based approaches. We train the AdvPrompter using a novel algorithm that does not require access to the gradients of the TargetLLM. This process alternates between two steps: (1) generating high-quality target adversarial suffixes by optimizing the AdvPrompter predictions, and (2) low-rank fine-tuning of the AdvPrompter with the generated adversarial suffixes. The trained AdvPrompter generates suffixes that veil the input instruction without changing its meaning, such that the TargetLLM is lured to give a harmful response. Experimental results on popular open source TargetLLMs show state-of-the-art results on the AdvBench dataset, that also transfer to closed-source black-box LLM APIs. Further, we demonstrate that by fine-tuning on a synthetic dataset generated by AdvPrompter, LLMs can be made more robust against jailbreaking attacks while maintaining performance, i.e. high MMLU scores.
4/29/2024
Improved Generation of Adversarial Examples Against Safety-aligned LLMs
Qizhang Li, Yiwen Guo, Wangmeng Zuo, Hao Chen
0
0
Despite numerous efforts to ensure large language models (LLMs) adhere to safety standards and produce harmless content, some successes have been achieved in bypassing these restrictions, known as jailbreak attacks against LLMs. Adversarial prompts generated using gradient-based methods exhibit outstanding performance in performing jailbreak attacks automatically. Nevertheless, due to the discrete nature of texts, the input gradient of LLMs struggles to precisely reflect the magnitude of loss change that results from token replacements in the prompt, leading to limited attack success rates against safety-aligned LLMs, even in the white-box setting. In this paper, we explore a new perspective on this problem, suggesting that it can be alleviated by leveraging innovations inspired in transfer-based attacks that were originally proposed for attacking black-box image classification models. For the first time, we appropriate the ideologies of effective methods among these transfer-based attacks, i.e., Skip Gradient Method and Intermediate Level Attack, for improving the effectiveness of automatically generated adversarial examples against white-box LLMs. With appropriate adaptations, we inject these ideologies into gradient-based adversarial prompt generation processes and achieve significant performance gains without introducing obvious computational cost. Meanwhile, by discussing mechanisms behind the gains, new insights are drawn, and proper combinations of these methods are also developed. Our empirical results show that the developed combination achieves >30% absolute increase in attack success rates compared with GCG for attacking the Llama-2-7B-Chat model on AdvBench.
6/3/2024
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, Yige Li, Ye Zhang, Jun Sun
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications. Despite their impressive performance, recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts even when aligned via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback or supervised fine-tuning. While existing defense methods focus on either detecting harmful prompts or reducing the likelihood of harmful responses through various means, defending LLMs against jailbreak attacks based on the inner mechanisms of LLMs remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate how LLMs response to harmful prompts and propose a novel defense method termed textbf{L}ayer-specific textbf{Ed}iting (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Through LED, we reveal that several critical textit{safety layers} exist among the early layers of LLMs. We then show that realigning these safety layers (and some selected additional layers) with the decoded safe response from selected target layers can significantly improve the alignment of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Extensive experiments across various LLMs (e.g., Llama2, Mistral) show the effectiveness of LED, which effectively defends against jailbreak attacks while maintaining performance on benign prompts. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/ledllm/ledllm}.
6/17/2024