Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for defending large language models (LLMs) against "jailbreak" attacks, which are attempts to bypass the safety and ethical constraints built into the models.
- The proposed approach involves layer-specific editing, which selectively modifies the model's internal layers to reinforce desired behaviors and mitigate harmful outputs.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on various LLMs, including GPT-3, and show that it can significantly reduce the success of jailbreak attacks while maintaining the model's core functionality.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers address a crucial issue with large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3: the risk of "jailbreak" attacks. These attacks aim to bypass the safeguards and ethical constraints that are built into the models, potentially allowing the models to generate harmful or undesirable outputs.
The researchers have developed a new technique called "layer-specific editing" to defend against these jailbreak attacks. The core idea is to selectively modify the model's internal layers in a way that reinforces the desired behaviors and mitigates the potential for harmful outputs, without significantly impacting the model's overall functionality.
The researchers tested their method on various LLMs and found that it can effectively reduce the success of jailbreak attacks while still allowing the models to perform their intended tasks. This is an important step in making these powerful language models more secure and reliable, particularly as they are increasingly deployed in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a method for defending large language models (LLMs) against "jailbreak" attacks, which are attempts to bypass the safety and ethical constraints built into the models. The proposed approach, called "layer-specific editing," selectively modifies the model's internal layers to reinforce desired behaviors and mitigate harmful outputs.
The authors first provide an overview of related work, including studies on jailbreak attacks, generalized nested jailbreak prompts, LLM self-defense, and adversarial prompting.
The core of the layer-specific editing approach involves identifying the specific layers in the LLM that are responsible for generating undesirable outputs during jailbreak attacks. The researchers then apply targeted edits to these layers, such as adjusting the weights or introducing additional constraints, to reinforce the model's intended behaviors and mitigate the potential for harmful outputs.
The authors evaluate their method on various LLMs, including GPT-3, and demonstrate its effectiveness in reducing the success of jailbreak attacks while maintaining the model's core functionality. They also discuss the implications of their work for the broader challenge of ensuring the safety and reliability of large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to defending LLMs against jailbreak attacks, but it does acknowledge several caveats and areas for further research. One key limitation is that the method requires a deep understanding of the model's internal architecture and the specific layers responsible for generating undesirable outputs. This may not be feasible for all LLMs, particularly those with more complex or opaque architectures.
Additionally, the researchers note that their method may not be able to completely eliminate the risk of jailbreak attacks, as determined adversaries may find ways to circumvent the layer-specific edits. Ongoing research and vigilance will be necessary to stay ahead of evolving attack strategies.
Further exploration of the long-term stability and generalizability of the layer-specific editing approach would also be valuable, as the researchers acknowledge that their experiments were limited in scope and duration.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to enhance the safety and reliability of large language models, but there is still much work to be done in this critical area of research.
Conclusion
The paper presents a layer-specific editing approach for defending large language models (LLMs) against "jailbreak" attacks, which aim to bypass the safety and ethical constraints built into the models. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their method in reducing the success of jailbreak attacks while maintaining the core functionality of various LLMs, including GPT-3.
This work contributes to the broader challenge of ensuring the safety and reliability of these powerful language models as they become more widely deployed in real-world applications. While the proposed approach has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to enhance the security and ethical behavior of LLMs.
As the field of large language models continues to evolve, further research and innovation in areas like model transparency, robust safety mechanisms, and adversarial defense will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of these technologies while mitigating their risks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, Yige Li, Ye Zhang, Jun Sun
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications. Despite their impressive performance, recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts even when aligned via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback or supervised fine-tuning. While existing defense methods focus on either detecting harmful prompts or reducing the likelihood of harmful responses through various means, defending LLMs against jailbreak attacks based on the inner mechanisms of LLMs remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate how LLMs response to harmful prompts and propose a novel defense method termed textbf{L}ayer-specific textbf{Ed}iting (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Through LED, we reveal that several critical textit{safety layers} exist among the early layers of LLMs. We then show that realigning these safety layers (and some selected additional layers) with the decoded safe response from selected target layers can significantly improve the alignment of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Extensive experiments across various LLMs (e.g., Llama2, Mistral) show the effectiveness of LED, which effectively defends against jailbreak attacks while maintaining performance on benign prompts. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/ledllm/ledllm}.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
Sibo Yi, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Tianshuo Cong, Xinlei He, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li
Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks, including question answering, translation, code completion, etc. However, the over-assistance of LLMs has raised the challenge of jailbreaking, which induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society by designing adversarial prompts. With the emergence of jailbreak attack methods exploiting different vulnerabilities in LLMs, the corresponding safety alignment measures are also evolving. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods. For instance, the attack methods are divided into black-box and white-box attacks based on the transparency of the target model. Meanwhile, we classify defense methods into prompt-level and model-level defenses. Additionally, we further subdivide these attack and defense methods into distinct sub-classes and present a coherent diagram illustrating their relationships. We also conduct an investigation into the current evaluation methods and compare them from different perspectives. Our findings aim to inspire future research and practical implementations in safeguarding LLMs against adversarial attacks. Above all, although jailbreak remains a significant concern within the community, we believe that our work enhances the understanding of this domain and provides a foundation for developing more secure LLMs.
Read more9/2/2024
💬
0
SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks
Alexander Robey, Eric Wong, Hamed Hassani, George J. Pappas
Despite efforts to align large language models (LLMs) with human intentions, widely-used LLMs such as GPT, Llama, and Claude are susceptible to jailbreaking attacks, wherein an adversary fools a targeted LLM into generating objectionable content. To address this vulnerability, we propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks. Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs. Across a range of popular LLMs, SmoothLLM sets the state-of-the-art for robustness against the GCG, PAIR, RandomSearch, and AmpleGCG jailbreaks. SmoothLLM is also resistant against adaptive GCG attacks, exhibits a small, though non-negligible trade-off between robustness and nominal performance, and is compatible with any LLM. Our code is publicly available at url{https://github.com/arobey1/smooth-llm}.
Read more6/17/2024
🤷
0
Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs
Fan Liu, Zhao Xu, Hao Liu
Although safely enhanced Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in tackling various complex tasks in a zero-shot manner, they remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, particularly the unknown jailbreak attack. To enhance LLMs' generalized defense capabilities, we propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework, which generates adversarial prompts to explore worst-case scenarios by optimizing datasets containing pairs of adversarial prompts and their safe responses. In the first stage, we introduce the hierarchical meta-universal adversarial prompt learning to efficiently and effectively generate token-level adversarial prompts. In the second stage, we propose the automatic adversarial prompt learning to iteratively refine semantic-level adversarial prompts, further enhancing LLM's defense capabilities. We conducted comprehensive experiments on three widely used jailbreak datasets, comparing our framework with six defense baselines under five representative attack scenarios. The results underscore the superiority of our proposed methods. Furthermore, our adversarial tuning framework exhibits empirical generalizability across various attack strategies and target LLMs, highlighting its potential as a transferable defense mechanism.
Read more6/12/2024