Sparse vs Contiguous Adversarial Pixel Perturbations in Multimodal Models: An Empirical Analysis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the differences between sparse and contiguous adversarial pixel perturbations in multimodal models.
- Sparse perturbations involve changing a small number of pixels, while contiguous perturbations change a connected region of pixels.
- The researchers conducted an empirical analysis to understand the impacts of these different types of perturbations on model performance.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small changes to the input can cause the model to make incorrect predictions. This paper looks at two different ways these adversarial attacks can work: sparse attacks that change only a few pixels, and contiguous attacks that change a whole region of pixels.
The researchers tested these attacks on multimodal models, which can handle different types of data like images and text. They wanted to see how the models responded to these different kinds of adversarial perturbations and understand the implications for model security.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an empirical analysis comparing the impact of sparse and contiguous adversarial pixel perturbations on multimodal models. The researchers conducted experiments using a variety of model architectures and adversarial attack algorithms.
They found that contiguous perturbations tend to be more effective at fooling the models compared to sparse perturbations of the same pixel budget. The paper discusses potential reasons for this, including the models' reliance on spatial correlations in the input data.
The results suggest that securing multimodal models against adversarial attacks may require considering the specific characteristics of the perturbations, beyond just the overall pixel budget. Defenses that are effective against sparse attacks may not be sufficient for contiguous perturbations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough empirical comparison of sparse and contiguous adversarial attacks on multimodal models. However, the analysis is limited to a specific set of model architectures and attack algorithms. Additional research would be needed to understand how generalizable these findings are across a broader range of models and attack techniques.
The paper does not explore potential reasons why contiguous perturbations may be more effective in depth. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms and the models' vulnerability to different types of input changes could yield valuable insights.
While the researchers acknowledge the importance of securing multimodal models, the paper does not propose any specific defense strategies. Exploring novel defense mechanisms tailored to the unique challenges posed by contiguous adversarial perturbations could be an interesting direction for future work.
Conclusion
This paper provides an important empirical comparison of sparse and contiguous adversarial pixel perturbations in the context of multimodal AI models. The finding that contiguous perturbations can be more effective than sparse ones of the same pixel budget highlights the need for robust defense mechanisms that account for the spatial characteristics of adversarial attacks. As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated and ubiquitous, understanding and addressing these security vulnerabilities will be crucial for ensuring the reliable and trustworthy deployment of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Sparse vs Contiguous Adversarial Pixel Perturbations in Multimodal Models: An Empirical Analysis
Cristian-Alexandru Botocan, Raphael Meier, Ljiljana Dolamic
Assessing the robustness of multimodal models against adversarial examples is an important aspect for the safety of its users. We craft L0-norm perturbation attacks on the preprocessed input images. We launch them in a black-box setup against four multimodal models and two unimodal DNNs, considering both targeted and untargeted misclassification. Our attacks target less than 0.04% of perturbed image area and integrate different spatial positioning of perturbed pixels: sparse positioning and pixels arranged in different contiguous shapes (row, column, diagonal, and patch). To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to assess the robustness of three state-of-the-art multimodal models (ALIGN, AltCLIP, GroupViT) against different sparse and contiguous pixel distribution perturbations. The obtained results indicate that unimodal DNNs are more robust than multimodal models. Furthermore, models using CNN-based Image Encoder are more vulnerable than models with ViT - for untargeted attacks, we obtain a 99% success rate by perturbing less than 0.02% of the image area.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Sample-agnostic Adversarial Perturbation for Vision-Language Pre-training Models
Haonan Zheng, Wen Jiang, Xinyang Deng, Wenrui Li
Recent studies on AI security have highlighted the vulnerability of Vision-Language Pre-training (VLP) models to subtle yet intentionally designed perturbations in images and texts. Investigating multimodal systems' robustness via adversarial attacks is crucial in this field. Most multimodal attacks are sample-specific, generating a unique perturbation for each sample to construct adversarial samples. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first work through multimodal decision boundaries to explore the creation of a universal, sample-agnostic perturbation that applies to any image. Initially, we explore strategies to move sample points beyond the decision boundaries of linear classifiers, refining the algorithm to ensure successful attacks under the top $k$ accuracy metric. Based on this foundation, in visual-language tasks, we treat visual and textual modalities as reciprocal sample points and decision hyperplanes, guiding image embeddings to traverse text-constructed decision boundaries, and vice versa. This iterative process consistently refines a universal perturbation, ultimately identifying a singular direction within the input space which is exploitable to impair the retrieval performance of VLP models. The proposed algorithms support the creation of global perturbations or adversarial patches. Comprehensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our method, showcasing its data, task, and model transferability across various VLP models and datasets. Code: https://github.com/LibertazZ/MUAP
Read more8/7/2024
📊
0
Certified Robustness against Sparse Adversarial Perturbations via Data Localization
Ambar Pal, Ren'e Vidal, Jeremias Sulam
Recent work in adversarial robustness suggests that natural data distributions are localized, i.e., they place high probability in small volume regions of the input space, and that this property can be utilized for designing classifiers with improved robustness guarantees for $ell_2$-bounded perturbations. Yet, it is still unclear if this observation holds true for more general metrics. In this work, we extend this theory to $ell_0$-bounded adversarial perturbations, where the attacker can modify a few pixels of the image but is unrestricted in the magnitude of perturbation, and we show necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of $ell_0$-robust classifiers. Theoretical certification approaches in this regime essentially employ voting over a large ensemble of classifiers. Such procedures are combinatorial and expensive or require complicated certification techniques. In contrast, a simple classifier emerges from our theory, dubbed Box-NN, which naturally incorporates the geometry of the problem and improves upon the current state-of-the-art in certified robustness against sparse attacks for the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets.
Read more5/24/2024
0
One Perturbation is Enough: On Generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations against Vision-Language Pre-training Models
Hao Fang, Jiawei Kong, Wenbo Yu, Bin Chen, Jiawei Li, Shutao Xia, Ke Xu
Vision-Language Pre-training (VLP) models trained on large-scale image-text pairs have demonstrated unprecedented capability in many practical applications. However, previous studies have revealed that VLP models are vulnerable to adversarial samples crafted by a malicious adversary. While existing attacks have achieved great success in improving attack effect and transferability, they all focus on instance-specific attacks that generate perturbations for each input sample. In this paper, we show that VLP models can be vulnerable to a new class of universal adversarial perturbation (UAP) for all input samples. Although initially transplanting existing UAP algorithms to perform attacks showed effectiveness in attacking discriminative models, the results were unsatisfactory when applied to VLP models. To this end, we revisit the multimodal alignments in VLP model training and propose the Contrastive-training Perturbation Generator with Cross-modal conditions (C-PGC). Specifically, we first design a generator that incorporates cross-modal information as conditioning input to guide the training. To further exploit cross-modal interactions, we propose to formulate the training objective as a multimodal contrastive learning paradigm based on our constructed positive and negative image-text pairs. By training the conditional generator with the designed loss, we successfully force the adversarial samples to move away from its original area in the VLP model's feature space, and thus essentially enhance the attacks. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves remarkable attack performance across various VLP models and Vision-and-Language (V+L) tasks. Moreover, C-PGC exhibits outstanding black-box transferability and achieves impressive results in fooling prevalent large VLP models including LLaVA and Qwen-VL.
Read more6/11/2024