Static Analysis of Logic Programs via Boolean Networks

Read original: arXiv:2407.09015 - Published 7/15/2024 by Van-Giang Trinh, Belaid Benhamou
Total Score

0

🌿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a static analysis technique for logic programs using Boolean networks.
  • The authors propose a method to represent logic programs as Boolean networks, which allows for efficient analysis and reasoning.
  • The approach enables the identification of inconsistent groundings and the verification of program properties.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a way to analyze logic programs more effectively using Boolean networks. Logic programs are a type of computer program that use logical rules to make decisions and inferences. Traditionally, analyzing these programs has been challenging, but the authors have found a new technique that can make the process easier.

The key idea is to represent the logic program as a Boolean network. A Boolean network is a type of mathematical model that uses simple on/off (true/false) logic to describe complex systems. By converting the logic program into this format, the researchers can then use established techniques for analyzing Boolean networks to identify potential issues or inconsistencies in the original program.

This approach allows the authors to verify important properties of the logic program, such as whether there are any contradictions or invalid conclusions that could be drawn from the rules. It also helps to identify parts of the program that may be incompatible with each other, which can be difficult to detect using traditional analysis methods.

Overall, this work provides a new way to better understand and validate the behavior of logic programs, which have important applications in areas like artificial intelligence and automated reasoning. By converting the programs into Boolean networks, the analysis can be performed more efficiently and effectively.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a method to represent logic programs as Boolean networks, which are mathematical models that use simple Boolean (true/false) logic to describe complex systems. This conversion enables the use of established techniques for analyzing Boolean networks to reason about the properties of the original logic program.

The key steps of the approach are:

  1. Defining a translation from logic programs to Boolean networks, where each predicate in the logic program corresponds to a Boolean variable in the network.
  2. Establishing a correspondence between the models of the logic program and the fixed points of the Boolean network.
  3. Leveraging this correspondence to identify inconsistent groundings and verify program properties using Boolean network analysis.

The authors provide formal definitions and proofs to establish the theoretical foundations of their approach. They also demonstrate the practical applicability of the method through several examples and case studies, showing how it can be used to detect inconsistencies and verify program properties more efficiently compared to traditional analysis techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for analyzing logic programs, but it also has some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The translation from logic programs to Boolean networks may not be straightforward for complex programs with many predicates and rules. Scalability and efficiency of the approach for large, real-world logic programs could be an area for further investigation.
  • The paper focuses on a specific class of logic programs, and it's unclear how well the method would generalize to other variants or extensions of logic programming, such as those with functions or probabilistic elements.
  • The paper does not address the potential challenges of interpreting the results of the Boolean network analysis in the context of the original logic program. Bridging the gap between the abstract Boolean network representation and the concrete program semantics could be an area for further work.

Overall, the paper presents a theoretically sound and potentially impactful approach to logic program analysis, but additional research may be needed to fully understand its practical limitations and applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel method for statically analyzing logic programs using Boolean networks. By converting the logic program into a Boolean network representation, the authors are able to leverage established techniques for analyzing these mathematical models to identify inconsistencies and verify program properties.

The key advantage of this approach is that it can provide a more efficient and scalable way to reason about the behavior of logic programs, which have important applications in areas like artificial intelligence and automated reasoning. While the method has some potential limitations, it represents a promising direction for improving the analysis and understanding of these types of programs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌿

Total Score

0

Static Analysis of Logic Programs via Boolean Networks

Van-Giang Trinh, Belaid Benhamou

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a declarative problem solving paradigm that can be used to encode a combinatorial problem as a logic program whose stable models correspond to the solutions of the considered problem. ASP has been widely applied to various domains in AI and beyond. The question What can be said about stable models of a logic program from its static information? has been investigated and proved useful in many circumstances. In this work, we dive into this direction more deeply by making the connection between a logic program and a Boolean network, which is a prominent modeling framework with applications to various areas. The proposed connection can bring the existing results in the rich history on static analysis of Boolean networks to explore and prove more theoretical results on ASP, making it become a unified and powerful tool to further study the static analysis of ASP. In particular, the newly obtained insights have the potential to benefit many problems in the field of ASP.

Read more

7/15/2024

Optimising Dynamic Traffic Distribution for Urban Networks with Answer Set Programming
Total Score

0

Optimising Dynamic Traffic Distribution for Urban Networks with Answer Set Programming

Matteo Cardellini, Carmine Dodaro, Marco Maratea, Mauro Vallati

Answer Set Programming (ASP) has demonstrated its potential as an effective tool for concisely representing and reasoning about real-world problems. In this paper, we present an application in which ASP has been successfully used in the context of dynamic traffic distribution for urban networks, within a more general framework devised for solving such a real-world problem. In particular, ASP has been employed for the computation of the optimal routes for all the vehicles in the network. We also provide an empirical analysis of the performance of the whole framework, and of its part in which ASP is employed, on two European urban areas, which shows the viability of the framework and the contribution ASP can give.

Read more

8/15/2024

Finite Groundings for ASP with Functions: A Journey through Consistency
Total Score

0

Finite Groundings for ASP with Functions: A Journey through Consistency

Lukas Gerlach (TU Dresden), David Carral (LIRMM, CRISAM, UM, CNRS, BOREAL), Markus Hecher (MIT)

Answer set programming (ASP) is a logic programming formalism used in various areas of artificial intelligence like combinatorial problem solving and knowledge representation and reasoning. It is known that enhancing ASP with function symbols makes basic reasoning problems highly undecidable. However, even in simple cases, state of the art reasoners, specifically those relying on a ground-and-solve approach, fail to produce a result. Therefore, we reconsider consistency as a basic reasoning problem for ASP. We show reductions that give an intuition for the high level of undecidability. These insights allow for a more fine-grained analysis where we characterize ASP programs as frugal and non-proliferous. For such programs, we are not only able to semi-decide consistency but we also propose a grounding procedure that yields finite groundings on more ASP programs with the concept of forbidden facts.

Read more

5/28/2024

💬

Total Score

0

LLASP: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Answer Set Programming

Erica Coppolillo, Francesco Calimeri, Giuseppe Manco, Simona Perri, Francesco Ricca

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their potential in various natural language processing tasks, including code generation. However, while significant progress has been made in adapting LLMs to generate code for several imperative programming languages and tasks, there remains a notable gap in their application to declarative formalisms, such as Answer Set Programming (ASP). In this paper, we move a step towards exploring the capabilities of LLMs for ASP code generation. First, we perform a systematic evaluation of several state-of-the-art LLMs. Despite their power in terms of number of parameters, training data and computational resources, empirical results demonstrate inadequate performances in generating correct ASP programs. Therefore, we propose LLASP, a fine-tuned lightweight model specifically trained to encode fundamental ASP program patterns. To this aim, we create an ad-hoc dataset covering a wide variety of fundamental problem specifications that can be encoded in ASP. Our experiments demonstrate that the quality of ASP programs generated by LLASP is remarkable. This holds true not only when compared to the non-fine-tuned counterpart but also when compared to the majority of eager LLM candidates, particularly from a semantic perspective. All the code and data used to perform the experiments are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LLASP-D86C/.

Read more

7/29/2024