On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraints

Overview

• The paper explores the challenge of producing accurate statistics while respecting individual privacy in a sample.
• It studies minimax lower bounds for differentially private estimators.
• The paper shows how to characterize the power of statistical tests under differential privacy by solving an appropriate transport problem.
• It derives Le Cam-type and Fano-type inequalities for various definitions of differential privacy.
• The paper provides several worked-out examples to illustrate the results.

Plain English Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of collecting useful statistical data while protecting the privacy of the individuals in the sample. Differential privacy is a way to quantify how much information about individuals is revealed by the statistics.

The key insight is that the power of a statistical test under differential privacy can be characterized by solving a "transport problem." This allows the researchers to derive mathematical bounds on how much the utility of the statistics is degraded by the privacy constraints.

The paper shows that the specific problem being studied has a big impact on how much privacy protection degrades the accuracy of the statistics. In some cases, a high degree of privacy only modestly reduces performance, while in other scenarios, even a small amount of privacy protection can significantly hurt the statistics.

The researchers also demonstrate that a differentially private algorithm called DP-SGLD can be used for maximum likelihood estimation, providing near-optimal results in terms of both sample size and privacy protection. This algorithm is applicable to a wide range of statistical modeling tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the minimax lower bounds for classes of differentially private estimators. The key idea is to characterize the power of a statistical test under differential privacy by solving an optimal transport problem.

This observation allows the authors to derive Le Cam-type and Fano-type inequalities not just for the standard definition of differential privacy, but also for definitions based on Rényi divergence. The paper provides several concrete examples to illustrate these results.

The examples reveal that the problem class has a significant impact on the degradation of utility due to privacy constraints. In some cases, maintaining a high degree of privacy only modestly reduces performance, while in other scenarios, even a modest level of privacy protection can lead to a substantial decrease in accuracy.

Finally, the paper demonstrates that the DP-SGLD algorithm, a private convex solver, can be used for maximum likelihood estimation with near-optimal results in terms of both sample size and privacy protection. This algorithm is applicable to a broad range of parametric estimation procedures, including exponential families.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the tradeoffs between privacy and utility in statistical estimation. The authors carefully characterize the problem-dependent nature of this tradeoff, which is an important insight for practical applications.

One potential limitation is that the paper focuses on parametric estimation and does not address the challenges of nonparametric settings, where the model structure is not known a priori. Extending these techniques to more flexible, data-driven modeling approaches could be an interesting area for future research.

Additionally, the paper does not consider the computational complexity of the differentially private algorithms, which can be a practical concern in real-world deployments. Exploring the computational efficiency of these methods, perhaps in comparison to alternative privacy-preserving techniques, could further strengthen the overall contribution.

Overall, the paper makes an important theoretical contribution to the field of differentially private statistical inference. The insights provided can help guide the development of privacy-preserving data analysis methods that balance accuracy and privacy in a nuanced, problem-specific manner.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the fundamental challenge of producing accurate statistics while respecting individual privacy. It provides a rigorous mathematical framework for characterizing the tradeoffs between privacy and utility in statistical estimation.

The key findings include the problem-dependent nature of this tradeoff, as well as the demonstration of a differentially private algorithm (DP-SGLD) that can achieve near-optimal performance for a broad class of parametric estimation tasks. These insights can inform the design of privacy-preserving data analysis techniques that are tailored to the specific requirements of different application domains.

Overall, this research advances our understanding of the complex interplay between statistical inference and privacy protection, paving the way for the development of more effective and responsible data-driven decision-making systems.