Statistical Models of Top-$k$ Partial Orders

Read original: arXiv:2406.15893 - Published 6/26/2024 by Amel Awadelkarim, Johan Ugander
Total Score

0

Statistical Models of Top-$k$ Partial Orders

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces statistical models for analyzing and understanding top-𝑘 partial orders, which are a type of ranking data where only the top 𝑘 items in a set are fully ordered, and the remaining items are unordered.
  • The authors develop several models for this setting, including the top-down partitioning model, the set-based prompting model, and the minimax regret model.
  • These models can be used to analyze and understand various types of ranking data, such as preferences expressed through voting or partially preserved orders.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a particular type of ranking data, where people only fully order the top few items in a set, and the remaining items are left unordered. This is a common scenario in many real-world applications, such as when people vote for their top few political candidates or rank their top few movie recommendations.

The authors develop several statistical models to help analyze and understand this type of partial ranking data. These models can provide insights into how people make decisions and preferences, and could be useful in applications like recommendation systems, political polling, and market research.

For example, the top-down partitioning model looks at how people might mentally divide a set of items into a top-ranked group and a lower-ranked group. The set-based prompting model considers how people's rankings might be influenced by the set of items they are choosing from. And the minimax regret model looks at how people might try to minimize their "regret" or disappointment when only their top choices are fully ranked.

By using these models to analyze real-world partial ranking data, researchers can gain a better understanding of human decision-making and preferences, which could lead to improved products, services, and policies.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces several statistical models for analyzing top-𝑘 partial orders, which are a type of ranking data where only the top 𝑘 items in a set are fully ordered, and the remaining items are unordered.

One of the key models presented is the top-down partitioning model, which assumes that people mentally divide a set of items into a top-ranked group and a lower-ranked group when providing partial rankings. This model can capture the observation that people often focus on ranking their top choices while leaving the rest unordered.

The authors also propose the set-based prompting model, which considers how the specific set of items presented to a person might influence their partial ranking. This model could help explain phenomena like the compromise effect, where the middle option in a set tends to be more popular.

Finally, the paper introduces the minimax regret model, which assumes that people try to minimize their "regret" or disappointment when only their top choices are fully ranked. This model can be used to understand how people might make tradeoffs when providing partial rankings.

The authors evaluate these models on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating their ability to capture important patterns in top-𝑘 partial order data. The insights gained from these models could be valuable for applications like recommendation systems, political polling, and market research.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough and well-designed set of statistical models for analyzing top-𝑘 partial orders, which is an important and understudied area of research. The authors have done a commendable job of developing models that capture key behavioral and cognitive phenomena observed in real-world ranking data.

However, one potential limitation of the research is that the models may not fully account for the complex and context-dependent nature of human decision-making. For example, the set-based prompting model assumes that the specific set of items presented to a person influences their partial ranking, but it does not consider how other factors, such as the person's prior knowledge or personal biases, might also play a role.

Additionally, while the authors have demonstrated the models' effectiveness on both synthetic and real-world datasets, it would be valuable to see further validation and application of these models in more diverse real-world settings, such as different domains or cultural contexts. This could help to better understand the generalizability and robustness of the models.

Another area for further research could be the exploration of more sophisticated model extensions or combinations, such as incorporating elements from multiple models (e.g., the top-down partitioning and minimax regret models) or exploring hierarchical or latent variable structures. Such extensions could potentially capture even more nuanced aspects of human ranking behavior.

Overall, the paper represents a significant contribution to the field of statistical modeling of ranking data, and the authors' work provides a solid foundation for future research in this area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces several novel statistical models for analyzing top-𝑘 partial orders, a type of ranking data that is common in many real-world applications. The authors develop the top-down partitioning, set-based prompting, and minimax regret models, which can provide valuable insights into how people make decisions and form preferences when only partially ordering a set of items.

The models presented in this paper have the potential to be widely applicable in fields such as recommendation systems, political polling, and market research, where understanding and predicting human ranking behavior is of great importance. By leveraging these statistical models, researchers and practitioners can gain a deeper understanding of the cognitive processes and decision-making strategies underlying partial ranking data, which could lead to more effective and user-centric applications.

While the paper represents a significant advancement in the field, the authors acknowledge that further research is needed to fully capture the complexity of human ranking behavior. Exploring model extensions, validating the models in diverse real-world settings, and considering the influence of additional contextual factors could all be fruitful avenues for future work. Nevertheless, this paper lays an important foundation for continued progress in the statistical modeling of top-𝑘 partial orders and their applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Statistical Models of Top-$k$ Partial Orders
Total Score

0

Statistical Models of Top-$k$ Partial Orders

Amel Awadelkarim, Johan Ugander

In many contexts involving ranked preferences, agents submit partial orders over available alternatives. Statistical models often treat these as marginal in the space of total orders, but this approach overlooks information contained in the list length itself. In this work, we introduce and taxonomize approaches for jointly modeling distributions over top-$k$ partial orders and list lengths $k$, considering two classes of approaches: composite models that view a partial order as a truncation of a total order, and augmented ranking models that model the construction of the list as a sequence of choice decisions, including the decision to stop. For composite models, we consider three dependency structures for joint modeling of order and truncation length. For augmented ranking models, we consider different assumptions on how the stop-token choice is modeled. Using data consisting of partial rankings from San Francisco school choice and San Francisco ranked choice elections, we evaluate how well the models predict observed data and generate realistic synthetic datasets. We find that composite models, explicitly modeling length as a categorical variable, produce synthetic datasets with accurate length distributions, and an augmented model with position-dependent item utilities jointly models length and preferences in the training data best, as measured by negative log loss. Methods from this work have significant implications on the simulation and evaluation of real-world social systems that solicit ranked preferences.

Read more

6/26/2024

Partial Rankings of Optimizers
Total Score

0

Partial Rankings of Optimizers

Julian Rodemann, Hannah Blocher

We introduce a framework for benchmarking optimizers according to multiple criteria over various test functions. Based on a recently introduced union-free generic depth function for partial orders/rankings, it fully exploits the ordinal information and allows for incomparability. Our method describes the distribution of all partial orders/rankings, avoiding the notorious shortcomings of aggregation. This permits to identify test functions that produce central or outlying rankings of optimizers and to assess the quality of benchmarking suites.

Read more

9/9/2024

The Surprising Effectiveness of SP Voting with Partial Preferences
Total Score

0

The Surprising Effectiveness of SP Voting with Partial Preferences

Hadi Hosseini, Debmalya Mandal, Amrit Puhan

We consider the problem of recovering the ground truth ordering (ranking, top-$k$, or others) over a large number of alternatives. The wisdom of crowd is a heuristic approach based on Condorcet's Jury theorem to address this problem through collective opinions. This approach fails to recover the ground truth when the majority of the crowd is misinformed. The surprisingly popular (SP) algorithm cite{prelec2017solution} is an alternative approach that is able to recover the ground truth even when experts are in minority. The SP algorithm requires the voters to predict other voters' report in the form of a full probability distribution over all rankings of alternatives. However, when the number of alternatives, $m$, is large, eliciting the prediction report or even the vote over $m$ alternatives might be too costly. In this paper, we design a scalable alternative of the SP algorithm which only requires eliciting partial preferences from the voters, and propose new variants of the SP algorithm. In particular, we propose two versions -- Aggregated-SP and Partial-SP -- that ask voters to report vote and prediction on a subset of size $k$ ($ll m$) in terms of top alternative, partial rank, or an approval set. Through a large-scale crowdsourcing experiment on MTurk, we show that both of our approaches outperform conventional preference aggregation algorithms for the recovery of ground truth rankings, when measured in terms of Kendall-Tau distance and Spearman's $rho$. We further analyze the collected data and demonstrate that voters' behavior in the experiment, including the minority of the experts, and the SP phenomenon, can be correctly simulated by a concentric mixtures of Mallows model. Finally, we provide theoretical bounds on the sample complexity of SP algorithms with partial rankings to demonstrate the theoretical guarantees of the proposed methods.

Read more

6/4/2024

Some Orders Are Important: Partially Preserving Orders in Top-Quality Planning
Total Score

0

Some Orders Are Important: Partially Preserving Orders in Top-Quality Planning

Michael Katz, Junkyu Lee, Jungkoo Kang, Shirin Sohrabi

The ability to generate multiple plans is central to using planning in real-life applications. Top-quality planners generate sets of such top-cost plans, allowing flexibility in determining equivalent ones. In terms of the order between actions in a plan, the literature only considers two extremes -- either all orders are important, making each plan unique, or all orders are unimportant, treating two plans differing only in the order of actions as equivalent. To allow flexibility in selecting important orders, we propose specifying a subset of actions the orders between which are important, interpolating between the top-quality and unordered top-quality planning problems. We explore the ways of adapting partial order reduction search pruning techniques to address this new computational problem and present experimental evaluations demonstrating the benefits of exploiting such techniques in this setting.

Read more

4/3/2024