A Comprehensive Benchmarking Analysis of Fault Recovery in Stream Processing Frameworks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of fault recovery in stream processing frameworks.
- It evaluates the performance and fault tolerance of popular stream processing systems, including Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming, and Apache Storm, under various failure scenarios.
- The researchers design a set of realistic benchmark workloads and fault injection tests to assess the frameworks' ability to recover from different types of failures.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well different data stream processing systems can handle and recover from problems or failures that may occur during operation. Stream processing is used in many real-world applications, such as monitoring sensor data or analyzing social media feeds, and it's important that these systems can continue working even if something goes wrong, like a machine crashing or a network connection being lost.
The researchers tested three popular stream processing frameworks - Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming, and Apache Storm - to see how they perform when different types of failures are introduced, such as losing a worker node or encountering corrupt data. They designed a set of benchmark tests that simulate real-world workloads and failures, and then measured how well each framework was able to detect and recover from those issues.
The goal was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the fault tolerance capabilities of these systems, which can help developers choose the right framework for their applications and identify areas where the frameworks could be improved to be more resilient.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on stream processing frameworks and the importance of fault tolerance in these systems. The authors then describe the experimental setup, including the benchmark workloads they designed to stress test the frameworks and the various fault injection techniques they used to simulate different failure scenarios.
The benchmarks were run on Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming, and Apache Storm, and the researchers measured metrics like end-to-end latency, throughput, and recovery time to assess the performance and resilience of each framework. The results show that the frameworks have varying levels of fault tolerance, with some handling certain failures better than others.
For example, the paper found that Apache Flink had the fastest recovery times when losing a worker node, thanks to its checkpoint-based fault tolerance mechanism. Apache Spark Streaming, on the other hand, struggled more with state recovery after failures, leading to higher latency and lower throughput.
The authors also explore the impact of factors like workload complexity, failure rate, and recovery mechanisms on the overall fault tolerance of the systems. They provide detailed analysis and comparisons of the frameworks' behavior under different failure conditions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed benchmarking study of fault recovery in stream processing frameworks. The researchers have done a commendable job of creating realistic failure scenarios and workloads to stress test the systems.
One potential limitation of the study is that it only covers three popular frameworks - Flink, Spark Streaming, and Storm. There are other stream processing systems, such as Kafka Streams and Google Dataflow, that were not included in the analysis. Expanding the scope to cover a wider range of frameworks could provide even more valuable insights.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on low-level performance metrics like latency and throughput. While these are important, it would also be interesting to see an analysis of how the fault tolerance capabilities of these frameworks impact real-world application behavior and end-user experience.
Overall, this is a well-executed study that contributes significantly to our understanding of the fault tolerance characteristics of leading stream processing systems. The findings can help developers make more informed choices when selecting a framework for their applications and can also inform future improvements to these systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of fault recovery in three popular stream processing frameworks: Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming, and Apache Storm. The researchers designed a set of realistic workloads and failure scenarios to thoroughly test the performance and resilience of these systems under various failure conditions.
The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each framework's fault tolerance capabilities, which can guide developers in selecting the right tool for their applications and help identify areas for improvement in these stream processing systems. Overall, this study contributes significantly to our understanding of how well these critical real-time data processing platforms can handle and recover from failures, which is essential for building robust and reliable applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Comprehensive Benchmarking Analysis of Fault Recovery in Stream Processing Frameworks
Adriano Vogel, Soren Henning, Esteban Perez-Wohlfeil, Otmar Ertl, Rick Rabiser
Nowadays, several software systems rely on stream processing architectures to deliver scalable performance and handle large volumes of data in near real-time. Stream processing frameworks facilitate scalable computing by distributing the application's execution across multiple machines. Despite performance being extensively studied, the measurement of fault tolerance-a key feature offered by stream processing frameworks-has still not been measured properly with updated and comprehensive testbeds. Moreover, the impact that fault recovery can have on performance is mostly ignored. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of fault recovery performance, stability, and recovery time in a cloud-native environment with modern open-source frameworks, namely Flink, Kafka Streams, and Spark Structured Streaming. Our benchmarking analysis is inspired by chaos engineering to inject failures. Generally, our results indicate that much has changed compared to previous studies on fault recovery in distributed stream processing. In particular, the results indicate that Flink is the most stable and has one of the best fault recovery. Moreover, Kafka Streams shows performance instabilities after failures, which is due to its current rebalancing strategy that can be suboptimal in terms of load balancing. Spark Structured Streaming shows suitable fault recovery performance and stability, but with higher event latency. Our study intends to (i) help industry practitioners in choosing the most suitable stream processing framework for efficient and reliable executions of data-intensive applications; (ii) support researchers in applying and extending our research method as well as our benchmark; (iii) identify, prevent, and assist in solving potential issues in production deployments.
Read more5/30/2024
❗
0
High-level Stream Processing: A Complementary Analysis of Fault Recovery
Adriano Vogel, Soren Henning, Esteban Perez-Wohlfeil, Otmar Ertl, Rick Rabiser
Parallel computing is very important to accelerate the performance of software systems. Additionally, considering that a recurring challenge is to process high data volumes continuously, stream processing emerged as a paradigm and software architectural style. Several software systems rely on stream processing to deliver scalable performance, whereas open-source frameworks provide coding abstraction and high-level parallel computing. Although stream processing's performance is being extensively studied, the measurement of fault tolerance--a key abstraction offered by stream processing frameworks--has still not been adequately measured with comprehensive testbeds. In this work, we extend the previous fault recovery measurements with an exploratory analysis of the configuration space, additional experimental measurements, and analysis of improvement opportunities. We focus on robust deployment setups inspired by requirements for near real-time analytics of a large cloud observability platform. The results indicate significant potential for improving fault recovery and performance. However, these improvements entail grappling with configuration complexities, particularly in identifying and selecting the configurations to be fine-tuned and determining the appropriate values for them. Therefore, new abstractions for transparent configuration tuning are also needed for large-scale industry setups. We believe that more software engineering efforts are needed to provide insights into potential abstractions and how to achieve them. The stream processing community and industry practitioners could also benefit from more interactions with the high-level parallel programming community, whose expertise and insights on making parallel programming more productive and efficient could be extended.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Streaming Technologies and Serialization Protocols: Empirical Performance Analysis
Samuel Jackson, Nathan Cummings, Saiful Khan
Efficiently streaming high-volume data is essential for real-time data analytics, visualization, and AI and machine learning model training. Various streaming technologies and serialization protocols have been developed to meet different streaming needs. Together, they perform differently across various tasks and datasets. Therefore, when developing a streaming system, it can be challenging to make an informed decision on the suitable combination, as we encountered when implementing streaming for the UKAEA's MAST data or SKA's radio astronomy data. This study addresses this gap by proposing an empirical study of widely used data streaming technologies and serialization protocols. We introduce an extensible and open-source software framework to benchmark their efficiency across various performance metrics. Our findings reveal significant performance differences and trade-offs between these technologies. These insights can help in choosing suitable streaming and serialization solutions for contemporary data challenges. We aim to provide the scientific community and industry professionals with the knowledge to optimize data streaming for better data utilization and real-time analysis.
Read more7/19/2024
🛸
0
A Fault Tolerance Mechanism for Hybrid Scientific Workflows
Alberto Mulone, Doriana Medi'c, Marco Aldinucci
In large distributed systems, failures are a daily event occurring frequently, especially with growing numbers of computation tasks and locations on which they are deployed. The advantage of representing an application with a workflow is the possibility of exploiting Workflow Management System (WMS) features such as portability. A relevant feature that some WMSs supply is reliability. Over recent years, the emergence of hybrid workflows has posed new and intriguing challenges by increasing the possibility of distributing computations involving heterogeneous and independent environments. Consequently, the number of possible points of failure in the execution increased, creating different important challenges that are interesting to study. This paper presents the implementation of a fault tolerance mechanism for hybrid workflows based on the recovery and rollback approach. A representation of the hybrid workflows with the formal framework is provided, together with the experiments demonstrating the functionality of implementing approach.
Read more7/9/2024