Structural Optimization Ambiguity and Simplicity Bias in Unsupervised Neural Grammar Induction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the bias towards simple structures in unsupervised neural grammar induction models.
- It explores how this simplicity bias can lead to ambiguity and suboptimal grammar representations.
- The researchers propose a structural optimization approach to address this issue and improve the quality of induced grammars.
Plain English Explanation
Unsupervised neural grammar induction models are algorithms that can automatically learn the grammatical structure of a language from raw text, without being explicitly trained on grammar rules. However, these models often develop a bias towards simpler grammatical structures, even when more complex structures would better capture the underlying language. This can lead to ambiguous and suboptimal grammar representations.
To address this problem, the researchers in this paper propose a structural optimization approach. The key idea is to explicitly encourage the model to learn more complex, yet well-defined grammatical structures, rather than defaulting to simpler alternatives. This helps the model overcome its inherent simplicity bias and produce grammars that more accurately reflect the true linguistic structure of the input data.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a structural optimization approach to address the simplicity bias in unsupervised neural grammar induction models. The core idea is to incorporate a structural complexity penalty into the objective function, which encourages the model to learn more intricate, well-defined grammatical structures, rather than defaulting to simpler alternatives.
Specifically, the researchers define a structural complexity measure based on the number of unique non-terminal symbols (i.e., grammar rules) used in the induced parse trees. By minimizing this complexity measure alongside the standard language modeling objective, the model is incentivized to discover more expressive grammars that capture the underlying linguistic structure more accurately.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets for unsupervised grammar induction, comparing the performance to various baseline models. They demonstrate that the structural optimization method leads to significant improvements in the quality of the induced grammars, as measured by standard metrics such as Dirichlet Forest scores and supervised parsing accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed approach to address the simplicity bias in unsupervised neural grammar induction. By explicitly encouraging the model to learn more complex, yet well-defined grammatical structures, the researchers show that the induced grammars can better capture the true linguistic structure of the input data.
One potential limitation of the work is that the structural complexity measure used in the objective function may not capture all aspects of grammatical sophistication. For example, it focuses solely on the number of unique non-terminal symbols, without considering the overall hierarchical organization or the semantic relationships between different components of the grammar. Exploring alternative complexity measures or incorporating additional structural constraints could be an area for future research.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a deeper analysis of why the simplicity bias arises in the first place, nor does it explore potential ways to address the underlying causes of this bias. Understanding the fundamental drivers of the simplicity bias could lead to more principled solutions that go beyond the specific structural optimization approach presented here.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of unsupervised neural grammar induction by addressing the simplicity bias that often arises in these models. By proposing a structural optimization approach, the researchers demonstrate that it is possible to overcome this bias and learn more expressive, well-defined grammars that better capture the true linguistic structure of the input data.
The insights and techniques presented in this work have the potential to enhance the performance of various language understanding and generation tasks that rely on the accurate extraction of grammatical structures from text. As the field of unsupervised language learning continues to evolve, addressing the challenges of simplicity bias and grammar ambiguity will be crucial for developing more robust and versatile natural language processing systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Structural Optimization Ambiguity and Simplicity Bias in Unsupervised Neural Grammar Induction
Jinwook Park, Kangil Kim
Neural parameterization has significantly advanced unsupervised grammar induction. However, training these models with a traditional likelihood loss for all possible parses exacerbates two issues: 1) $textit{structural optimization ambiguity}$ that arbitrarily selects one among structurally ambiguous optimal grammars despite the specific preference of gold parses, and 2) $textit{structural simplicity bias}$ that leads a model to underutilize rules to compose parse trees. These challenges subject unsupervised neural grammar induction (UNGI) to inevitable prediction errors, high variance, and the necessity for extensive grammars to achieve accurate predictions. This paper tackles these issues, offering a comprehensive analysis of their origins. As a solution, we introduce $textit{sentence-wise parse-focusing}$ to reduce the parse pool per sentence for loss evaluation, using the structural bias from pre-trained parsers on the same dataset. In unsupervised parsing benchmark tests, our method significantly improves performance while effectively reducing variance and bias toward overly simplistic parses. Our research promotes learning more compact, accurate, and consistent explicit grammars, facilitating better interpretability.
Read more7/24/2024
0
New!Improving Unsupervised Constituency Parsing via Maximizing Semantic Information
Junjie Chen, Xiangheng He, Yusuke Miyao, Danushka Bollegala
Unsupervised constituency parsers organize phrases within a sentence into a tree-shaped syntactic constituent structure that reflects the organization of sentence semantics. However, the traditional objective of maximizing sentence log-likelihood (LL) does not explicitly account for the close relationship between the constituent structure and the semantics, resulting in a weak correlation between LL values and parsing accuracy. In this paper, we introduce a novel objective for training unsupervised parsers: maximizing the information between constituent structures and sentence semantics (SemInfo). We introduce a bag-of-substrings model to represent the semantics and apply the probability-weighted information metric to estimate the SemInfo. Additionally, we develop a Tree Conditional Random Field (TreeCRF)-based model to apply the SemInfo maximization objective to Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG) induction, the state-of-the-art method for unsupervised constituency parsing. Experiments demonstrate that SemInfo correlates more strongly with parsing accuracy than LL. Our algorithm significantly enhances parsing accuracy by an average of 7.85 points across five PCFG variants and in four languages, achieving new state-of-the-art results in three of the four languages.
Read more10/4/2024
0
Learning Language Structures through Grounding
Freda Shi
Language is highly structured, with syntactic and semantic structures, to some extent, agreed upon by speakers of the same language. With implicit or explicit awareness of such structures, humans can learn and use language efficiently and generalize to sentences that contain unseen words. Motivated by human language learning, in this dissertation, we consider a family of machine learning tasks that aim to learn language structures through grounding. We seek distant supervision from other data sources (i.e., grounds), including but not limited to other modalities (e.g., vision), execution results of programs, and other languages. We demonstrate the potential of this task formulation and advocate for its adoption through three schemes. In Part I, we consider learning syntactic parses through visual grounding. We propose the task of visually grounded grammar induction, present the first models to induce syntactic structures from visually grounded text and speech, and find that the visual grounding signals can help improve the parsing quality over language-only models. As a side contribution, we propose a novel evaluation metric that enables the evaluation of speech parsing without text or automatic speech recognition systems involved. In Part II, we propose two execution-aware methods to map sentences into corresponding semantic structures (i.e., programs), significantly improving compositional generalization and few-shot program synthesis. In Part III, we propose methods that learn language structures from annotations in other languages. Specifically, we propose a method that sets a new state of the art on cross-lingual word alignment. We then leverage the learned word alignments to improve the performance of zero-shot cross-lingual dependency parsing, by proposing a novel substructure-based projection method that preserves structural knowledge learned from the source language.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Ensemble Distillation for Unsupervised Constituency Parsing
Behzad Shayegh, Yanshuai Cao, Xiaodan Zhu, Jackie C. K. Cheung, Lili Mou
We investigate the unsupervised constituency parsing task, which organizes words and phrases of a sentence into a hierarchical structure without using linguistically annotated data. We observe that existing unsupervised parsers capture differing aspects of parsing structures, which can be leveraged to enhance unsupervised parsing performance. To this end, we propose a notion of tree averaging, based on which we further propose a novel ensemble method for unsupervised parsing. To improve inference efficiency, we further distill the ensemble knowledge into a student model; such an ensemble-then-distill process is an effective approach to mitigate the over-smoothing problem existing in common multi-teacher distilling methods. Experiments show that our method surpasses all previous approaches, consistently demonstrating its effectiveness and robustness across various runs, with different ensemble components, and under domain-shift conditions.
Read more4/29/2024