On Trojans in Refined Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2406.07778 - Published 8/23/2024 by Jayaram Raghuram, George Kesidis, David J. Miller
Total Score

0

On Trojans in Refined Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Introduction

The provided paper explores the potential for Trojans, or hidden vulnerabilities, to be introduced into large language models (LLMs) through the process of model refinement. LLMs are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of data to generate human-like text, and they have become increasingly important in various applications. However, the authors raise concerns about the susceptibility of these models to Trojans, which could be exploited to produce undesirable or even harmful outputs.

LLM Instruction Attack Experiments

Instruction Attacks on LLMs

The paper describes experiments where the researchers attempt to instill Trojans in LLMs by introducing specific instructions during the model refinement process. These Trojans are designed to activate when the model receives certain prompts, causing it to generate outputs that deviate from its intended behavior.

The researchers explore various attack strategies, including injecting Trojan triggers into the training data and directly modifying the model parameters. They investigate the effectiveness of these techniques and the potential for detecting and mitigating such Trojan attacks.

Implications and Limitations

The findings of the paper have significant implications for the deployment and security of LLMs in sensitive applications, such as recommendation systems and language-based interfaces. The authors highlight the need for robust defense mechanisms and diligent monitoring to prevent the exploitation of these models.

However, the paper also acknowledges the limitations of the research, such as the specific attack scenarios explored and the challenges in fully capturing the complexity of real-world deployment environments. Further research and collaboration between researchers, developers, and end-users are necessary to address these challenges and ensure the reliable and secure use of LLMs.

Conclusion

The paper's findings underscore the importance of continued vigilance and proactive measures to safeguard LLMs against Trojan attacks. As these models become more prevalent and influential, understanding their vulnerabilities and developing effective countermeasures will be crucial to maintaining trust and responsible deployment in critical applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On Trojans in Refined Language Models
Total Score

0

On Trojans in Refined Language Models

Jayaram Raghuram, George Kesidis, David J. Miller

Backdoor data poisoning, inserted within instruction examples used to fine-tune a foundation Large Language Model (LLM) for downstream tasks (textit{e.g.,} sentiment prediction), is a serious security concern due to the evasive nature of such attacks. The poisoning is usually in the form of a (seemingly innocuous) trigger word or phrase inserted into a very small fraction of the fine-tuning samples from a target class. Such backdoor attacks can: alter response sentiment, violate censorship, over-refuse (invoke censorship for legitimate queries), inject false content, or trigger nonsense responses (hallucinations). In this work we investigate the efficacy of instruction fine-tuning backdoor attacks as attack hyperparameters are varied under a variety of scenarios, considering: the trigger location in the poisoned examples; robustness to change in the trigger location, partial triggers, and synonym substitutions at test time; attack transfer from one (fine-tuning) domain to a related test domain; and clean-label vs. dirty-label poisoning. Based on our observations, we propose and evaluate two defenses against these attacks: i) a textit{during-fine-tuning defense} based on word-frequency counts that assumes the (possibly poisoned) fine-tuning dataset is available and identifies the backdoor trigger tokens; and ii) a textit{post-fine-tuning defense} based on downstream clean fine-tuning of the backdoored LLM with a small defense dataset. Finally, we provide a brief survey of related work on backdoor attacks and defenses.

Read more

8/23/2024

If You Don't Understand It, Don't Use It: Eliminating Trojans with Filters Between Layers
Total Score

0

If You Don't Understand It, Don't Use It: Eliminating Trojans with Filters Between Layers

Adriano Hernandez

Large language models (LLMs) sometimes exhibit dangerous unintended behaviors. Finding and fixing these is challenging because the attack surface is massive -- it is not tractable to exhaustively search for all possible inputs that may elicit such behavior. One specific and particularly challenging case is that if data-poisoning-injected trojans, since there is no way to know what they are to search for them. To our knowledge, there is no generally applicable method to unlearn unknown trojans injected during pre-training. This work seeks to provide a general purpose recipe (filters) and a specific implementation (LoRA) filters that work in practice on small to medium sized models. The focus is primarily empirical, though some perplexing behavior opens the door to the fundamental question of how LLMs store and process information. Not unexpectedly, we find that our filters work best on the residual stream and the latest layers.

Read more

7/10/2024

Trojans in Large Language Models of Code: A Critical Review through a Trigger-Based Taxonomy
Total Score

0

Trojans in Large Language Models of Code: A Critical Review through a Trigger-Based Taxonomy

Aftab Hussain, Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Toufique Ahmed, Bowen Xu, Premkumar Devanbu, Mohammad Amin Alipour

Large language models (LLMs) have provided a lot of exciting new capabilities in software development. However, the opaque nature of these models makes them difficult to reason about and inspect. Their opacity gives rise to potential security risks, as adversaries can train and deploy compromised models to disrupt the software development process in the victims' organization. This work presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art trojan attacks on large language models of code, with a focus on triggers -- the main design point of trojans -- with the aid of a novel unifying trigger taxonomy framework. We also aim to provide a uniform definition of the fundamental concepts in the area of trojans in Code LLMs. Finally, we draw implications of findings on how code models learn on trigger design.

Read more

5/7/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Trojan Detection in Large Language Models: Insights from The Trojan Detection Challenge

Narek Maloyan, Ekansh Verma, Bulat Nutfullin, Bislan Ashinov

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various domains, but their vulnerability to trojan or backdoor attacks poses significant security risks. This paper explores the challenges and insights gained from the Trojan Detection Competition 2023 (TDC2023), which focused on identifying and evaluating trojan attacks on LLMs. We investigate the difficulty of distinguishing between intended and unintended triggers, as well as the feasibility of reverse engineering trojans in real-world scenarios. Our comparative analysis of various trojan detection methods reveals that achieving high Recall scores is significantly more challenging than obtaining high Reverse-Engineering Attack Success Rate (REASR) scores. The top-performing methods in the competition achieved Recall scores around 0.16, comparable to a simple baseline of randomly sampling sentences from a distribution similar to the given training prefixes. This finding raises questions about the detectability and recoverability of trojans inserted into the model, given only the harmful targets. Despite the inability to fully solve the problem, the competition has led to interesting observations about the viability of trojan detection and improved techniques for optimizing LLM input prompts. The phenomenon of unintended triggers and the difficulty in distinguishing them from intended triggers highlights the need for further research into the robustness and interpretability of LLMs. The TDC2023 has provided valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with trojan detection in LLMs, laying the groundwork for future research in this area to ensure their safety and reliability in real-world applications.

Read more

4/23/2024