Trojan Detection in Large Language Models: Insights from The Trojan Detection Challenge

Read original: arXiv:2404.13660 - Published 4/23/2024 by Narek Maloyan, Ekansh Verma, Bulat Nutfullin, Bislan Ashinov
Total Score

0

🔎

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the challenge of detecting Trojans in large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data.
  • Trojans are hidden vulnerabilities that can cause an LLM to behave maliciously when triggered by a specific input.
  • The paper presents insights from the Trojan Detection Challenge, a competition that aimed to develop effective techniques for identifying Trojans in LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, these models can also have hidden vulnerabilities called "Trojans" that could cause them to behave in unexpected or malicious ways when triggered by a specific input.

The Trojan Detection Challenge was a competition that brought together researchers to develop techniques for identifying these Trojans in LLMs. The insights from this challenge, as described in the paper, provide valuable information on the current state of Trojan detection and the challenges involved in making LLMs more secure and robust.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing background on Trojans in LLMs, explaining that these hidden vulnerabilities can be introduced during the training process and can cause the model to output harmful or unintended content when prompted with a specific "trigger" input.

The authors then describe the Trojan Detection Challenge, which involved participants developing methods to detect Trojans in LLMs. The challenge used a diverse set of LLMs and Trojan attack scenarios to test the effectiveness of different detection approaches.

The key insights from the challenge include:

  • The difficulty of detecting Trojans, as they can be highly stealthy and resilient to certain detection methods
  • The need for a multi-pronged approach that combines various detection techniques, such as internal link: ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models
  • The importance of developing robust and comprehensive auditing methodologies to identify vulnerabilities in LLMs, as described in internal link: Large Language Model Vulnerability Detection & Repair Literature
  • The potential for adversaries to exploit Trojans to hijack the behavior of LLMs, as explored in internal link: Exploring Backdoor Vulnerabilities in Chat Models

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights the significant challenge of detecting Trojans in LLMs, which can be highly stealthy and resistant to many detection methods. The authors acknowledge the need for more research and the development of comprehensive auditing methodologies, as mentioned in internal link: CyberSecEval: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite.

One potential area for further exploration is the impact of different Trojan attack scenarios on the performance and reliability of detection techniques. The paper focuses on the overall difficulty of Trojan detection, but a more in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of various approaches across diverse attack vectors could provide additional insights.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for adversaries to leverage internal link: Vocabulary Attacks to Hijack Large Language Models, which could be another avenue for exploiting vulnerabilities in LLMs.

Conclusion

The insights from the Trojan Detection Challenge underscore the significant challenges in ensuring the security and robustness of large language models. While current Trojan detection techniques have limitations, the paper highlights the need for continued research and the development of comprehensive auditing methodologies to identify and mitigate these vulnerabilities.

Addressing the Trojan threat is crucial for the safe and responsible deployment of LLMs, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in various applications. The findings in this paper provide a valuable starting point for further exploration and innovation in this critical area of AI security.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

Total Score

0

Trojan Detection in Large Language Models: Insights from The Trojan Detection Challenge

Narek Maloyan, Ekansh Verma, Bulat Nutfullin, Bislan Ashinov

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various domains, but their vulnerability to trojan or backdoor attacks poses significant security risks. This paper explores the challenges and insights gained from the Trojan Detection Competition 2023 (TDC2023), which focused on identifying and evaluating trojan attacks on LLMs. We investigate the difficulty of distinguishing between intended and unintended triggers, as well as the feasibility of reverse engineering trojans in real-world scenarios. Our comparative analysis of various trojan detection methods reveals that achieving high Recall scores is significantly more challenging than obtaining high Reverse-Engineering Attack Success Rate (REASR) scores. The top-performing methods in the competition achieved Recall scores around 0.16, comparable to a simple baseline of randomly sampling sentences from a distribution similar to the given training prefixes. This finding raises questions about the detectability and recoverability of trojans inserted into the model, given only the harmful targets. Despite the inability to fully solve the problem, the competition has led to interesting observations about the viability of trojan detection and improved techniques for optimizing LLM input prompts. The phenomenon of unintended triggers and the difficulty in distinguishing them from intended triggers highlights the need for further research into the robustness and interpretability of LLMs. The TDC2023 has provided valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with trojan detection in LLMs, laying the groundwork for future research in this area to ensure their safety and reliability in real-world applications.

Read more

4/23/2024

Trojans in Large Language Models of Code: A Critical Review through a Trigger-Based Taxonomy
Total Score

0

Trojans in Large Language Models of Code: A Critical Review through a Trigger-Based Taxonomy

Aftab Hussain, Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Toufique Ahmed, Bowen Xu, Premkumar Devanbu, Mohammad Amin Alipour

Large language models (LLMs) have provided a lot of exciting new capabilities in software development. However, the opaque nature of these models makes them difficult to reason about and inspect. Their opacity gives rise to potential security risks, as adversaries can train and deploy compromised models to disrupt the software development process in the victims' organization. This work presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art trojan attacks on large language models of code, with a focus on triggers -- the main design point of trojans -- with the aid of a novel unifying trigger taxonomy framework. We also aim to provide a uniform definition of the fundamental concepts in the area of trojans in Code LLMs. Finally, we draw implications of findings on how code models learn on trigger design.

Read more

5/7/2024

On Trojans in Refined Language Models
Total Score

0

On Trojans in Refined Language Models

Jayaram Raghuram, George Kesidis, David J. Miller

Backdoor data poisoning, inserted within instruction examples used to fine-tune a foundation Large Language Model (LLM) for downstream tasks (textit{e.g.,} sentiment prediction), is a serious security concern due to the evasive nature of such attacks. The poisoning is usually in the form of a (seemingly innocuous) trigger word or phrase inserted into a very small fraction of the fine-tuning samples from a target class. Such backdoor attacks can: alter response sentiment, violate censorship, over-refuse (invoke censorship for legitimate queries), inject false content, or trigger nonsense responses (hallucinations). In this work we investigate the efficacy of instruction fine-tuning backdoor attacks as attack hyperparameters are varied under a variety of scenarios, considering: the trigger location in the poisoned examples; robustness to change in the trigger location, partial triggers, and synonym substitutions at test time; attack transfer from one (fine-tuning) domain to a related test domain; and clean-label vs. dirty-label poisoning. Based on our observations, we propose and evaluate two defenses against these attacks: i) a textit{during-fine-tuning defense} based on word-frequency counts that assumes the (possibly poisoned) fine-tuning dataset is available and identifies the backdoor trigger tokens; and ii) a textit{post-fine-tuning defense} based on downstream clean fine-tuning of the backdoored LLM with a small defense dataset. Finally, we provide a brief survey of related work on backdoor attacks and defenses.

Read more

8/23/2024

Unlearning Trojans in Large Language Models: A Comparison Between Natural Language and Source Code
Total Score

0

Unlearning Trojans in Large Language Models: A Comparison Between Natural Language and Source Code

Mahdi Kazemi, Aftab Hussain, Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Mohammad Amin Alipour, Sen Lin

This work investigates the application of Machine Unlearning (MU) for mitigating the impact of trojans embedded in conventional large language models of natural language (Text-LLMs) and large language models of code (Code-LLMs) We propose a novel unlearning approach, LYA, that leverages both gradient ascent and elastic weight consolidation, a Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) based regularization technique, to unlearn trojans from poisoned models. We compare the effectiveness of LYA against conventional techniques like fine-tuning, retraining, and vanilla gradient ascent. The subject models we investigate are BERT and CodeBERT, for sentiment analysis and code defect detection tasks, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the combination of gradient ascent and FIM-based regularization, as done in LYA, outperforms existing methods in removing the trojan's influence from the poisoned model, while preserving its original functionality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that compares and contrasts MU of trojans in LLMs, in the NL and Coding domain.

Read more

8/23/2024