Studying the Impact of Latent Representations in Implicit Neural Networks for Scientific Continuous Field Reconstruction
2404.06418
0
0
Abstract
Learning a continuous and reliable representation of physical fields from sparse sampling is challenging and it affects diverse scientific disciplines. In a recent work, we present a novel model called MMGN (Multiplicative and Modulated Gabor Network) with implicit neural networks. In this work, we design additional studies leveraging explainability methods to complement the previous experiments and further enhance the understanding of latent representations generated by the model. The adopted methods are general enough to be leveraged for any latent space inspection. Preliminary results demonstrate the contextual information incorporated in the latent representations and their impact on the model performance. As a work in progress, we will continue to verify our findings and develop novel explainability approaches.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the impact of latent representations in implicit neural networks on the reconstruction of scientific continuous fields.
- The researchers investigate how the choice of latent representation affects the performance of these neural networks in tasks like fluid dynamics and electromagnetism simulations.
- The paper provides insights into the trade-offs between different latent representation strategies and their influence on the model's accuracy, generalization, and interpretability.
Plain English Explanation
In this study, the researchers looked at how the "hidden layers" or latent representations inside neural networks can affect their ability to accurately recreate continuous scientific fields, such as the flow of fluids or the behavior of electromagnetic fields.
Neural networks are a type of machine learning model that can learn complex patterns in data, and they are often used to simulate or predict the behavior of various physical systems. However, the way the network's internal structure is designed can have a big impact on its performance.
The researchers compared different approaches to organizing the latent, or hidden, representations within the neural network. They found that the choice of latent representation affected the model's accuracy, its ability to generalize to new situations, and how easy it was to interpret the inner workings of the network.
By understanding these trade-offs, the researchers hope to help scientists and engineers choose the best neural network architecture for their specific scientific modeling tasks, whether that's simulating fluid flows, electromagnetic fields, or other continuous phenomena.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the influence of latent representations in implicit neural networks for the task of scientific continuous field reconstruction. Implicit neural networks are a type of machine learning model that can learn to represent and interpolate complex physical fields from sparse data, without the need for an explicit grid-based discretization.
The researchers compare different strategies for organizing the latent, or hidden, layers within these implicit neural networks. They experiment with various latent representation schemes, including latent vector representations, multi-operation latent spaces, and generative latent representations.
The performance of these latent representation strategies is evaluated on benchmark scientific field reconstruction tasks, such as fluid dynamics simulations and electromagnetic field calculations. The researchers analyze the trade-offs between accuracy, generalization, and interpretability for each latent representation approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of the impact of latent representations on the performance of implicit neural networks for scientific field reconstruction. The researchers have carefully designed their experiments to isolate the effects of different latent representation strategies, which is commendable.
However, one potential limitation of the study is the use of only benchmark tasks, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world scientific modeling scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the latent representation strategies perform on more diverse and challenging datasets, or in applications with additional constraints or requirements.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability of the latent representations and how they might provide insights into the underlying physical phenomena being modeled. Further analysis in this direction could enhance the practical usefulness of the research.
Overall, this is a well-designed and informative study that advances our understanding of the role of latent representations in implicit neural networks for scientific continuous field reconstruction. The insights provided can inform the development of more effective and interpretable neural network architectures for a variety of scientific modeling tasks.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a detailed investigation into the impact of latent representations on the performance of implicit neural networks for scientific continuous field reconstruction. The study compares various latent representation strategies and evaluates their trade-offs in terms of accuracy, generalization, and interpretability.
The findings suggest that the choice of latent representation can significantly influence the model's capabilities, highlighting the importance of carefully designing the internal structure of neural networks for scientific applications. By understanding these trade-offs, researchers and engineers can make more informed decisions when selecting the appropriate neural network architecture for their specific scientific modeling needs.
The insights gained from this work contribute to the ongoing efforts to develop more powerful and interpretable neural network-based tools for simulating and predicting complex physical phenomena, with potential applications in fields such as fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Explaining latent representations of generative models with large multimodal models
Mengdan Zhu, Zhenke Liu, Bo Pan, Abhinav Angirekula, Liang Zhao
0
0
Learning interpretable representations of data generative latent factors is an important topic for the development of artificial intelligence. With the rise of the large multimodal model, it can align images with text to generate answers. In this work, we propose a framework to comprehensively explain each latent variable in the generative models using a large multimodal model. We further measure the uncertainty of our generated explanations, quantitatively evaluate the performance of explanation generation among multiple large multimodal models, and qualitatively visualize the variations of each latent variable to learn the disentanglement effects of different generative models on explanations. Finally, we discuss the explanatory capabilities and limitations of state-of-the-art large multimodal models.
4/19/2024
🧠
Latent Communication in Artificial Neural Networks
Luca Moschella
0
0
As NNs permeate various scientific and industrial domains, understanding the universality and reusability of their representations becomes crucial. At their core, these networks create intermediate neural representations, indicated as latent spaces, of the input data and subsequently leverage them to perform specific downstream tasks. This dissertation focuses on the universality and reusability of neural representations. Do the latent representations crafted by a NN remain exclusive to a particular trained instance, or can they generalize across models, adapting to factors such as randomness during training, model architecture, or even data domain? This adaptive quality introduces the notion of Latent Communication -- a phenomenon that describes when representations can be unified or reused across neural spaces. A salient observation from our research is the emergence of similarities in latent representations, even when these originate from distinct or seemingly unrelated NNs. By exploiting a partial correspondence between the two data distributions that establishes a semantic link, we found that these representations can either be projected into a universal representation, coined as Relative Representation, or be directly translated from one space to another. Latent Communication allows for a bridge between independently trained NN, irrespective of their training regimen, architecture, or the data modality they were trained on -- as long as the data semantic content stays the same (e.g., images and their captions). This holds true for both generation, classification and retrieval downstream tasks; in supervised, weakly supervised, and unsupervised settings; and spans various data modalities including images, text, audio, and graphs -- showcasing the universality of the Latent Communication phenomenon. [...]
6/18/2024
Unveiling LLMs: The Evolution of Latent Representations in a Temporal Knowledge Graph
Marco Bronzini, Carlo Nicolini, Bruno Lepri, Jacopo Staiano, Andrea Passerini
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate an impressive capacity to recall a vast range of common factual knowledge information. However, unravelling the underlying reasoning of LLMs and explaining their internal mechanisms of exploiting this factual knowledge remain active areas of investigation. Our work analyzes the factual knowledge encoded in the latent representation of LLMs when prompted to assess the truthfulness of factual claims. We propose an end-to-end framework that jointly decodes the factual knowledge embedded in the latent space of LLMs from a vector space to a set of ground predicates and represents its evolution across the layers using a temporal knowledge graph. Our framework relies on the technique of activation patching which intervenes in the inference computation of a model by dynamically altering its latent representations. Consequently, we neither rely on external models nor training processes. We showcase our framework with local and global interpretability analyses using two claim verification datasets: FEVER and CLIMATE-FEVER. The local interpretability analysis exposes different latent errors from representation to multi-hop reasoning errors. On the other hand, the global analysis uncovered patterns in the underlying evolution of the model's factual knowledge (e.g., store-and-seek factual information). By enabling graph-based analyses of the latent representations, this work represents a step towards the mechanistic interpretability of LLMs.
4/5/2024
LatentExplainer: Explaining Latent Representations in Deep Generative Models with Multi-modal Foundation Models
Mengdan Zhu, Raasikh Kanjiani, Jiahui Lu, Andrew Choi, Qirui Ye, Liang Zhao
0
0
Deep generative models like VAEs and diffusion models have advanced various generation tasks by leveraging latent variables to learn data distributions and generate high-quality samples. Despite the field of explainable AI making strides in interpreting machine learning models, understanding latent variables in generative models remains challenging. This paper introduces LatentExplainer, a framework for automatically generating semantically meaningful explanations of latent variables in deep generative models. LatentExplainer tackles three main challenges: inferring the meaning of latent variables, aligning explanations with inductive biases, and handling varying degrees of explainability. By perturbing latent variables and interpreting changes in generated data, the framework provides a systematic approach to understanding and controlling the data generation process, enhancing the transparency and interpretability of deep generative models. We evaluate our proposed method on several real-world and synthetic datasets, and the results demonstrate superior performance in generating high-quality explanations of latent variables.
7/1/2024