Stochastic Gradient Descent for Gaussian Processes Done Right
2310.20581
0
0
📊
Abstract
As is well known, both sampling from the posterior and computing the mean of the posterior in Gaussian process regression reduces to solving a large linear system of equations. We study the use of stochastic gradient descent for solving this linear system, and show that when emph{done right} -- by which we mean using specific insights from the optimisation and kernel communities -- stochastic gradient descent is highly effective. To that end, we introduce a particularly simple emph{stochastic dual descent} algorithm, explain its design in an intuitive manner and illustrate the design choices through a series of ablation studies. Further experiments demonstrate that our new method is highly competitive. In particular, our evaluations on the UCI regression tasks and on Bayesian optimisation set our approach apart from preconditioned conjugate gradients and variational Gaussian process approximations. Moreover, our method places Gaussian process regression on par with state-of-the-art graph neural networks for molecular binding affinity prediction.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Solving large linear systems is a key challenge in Gaussian process regression
- The paper explores using stochastic gradient descent to solve these linear systems
- The authors introduce a "stochastic dual descent" algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness
Plain English Explanation
In Gaussian process regression, making predictions requires solving a large set of linear equations. This can be computationally demanding, especially for large datasets.
The paper looks at using stochastic gradient descent - a popular optimization technique - to solve these linear systems more efficiently. Stochastic gradient descent works by updating the solution gradually, rather than solving the entire system at once.
The authors developed a specific stochastic gradient descent algorithm called "stochastic dual descent" that incorporates some key insights from optimization and kernel methods. This algorithm is described in an intuitive way, and the authors show through various experiments that it outperforms other methods for solving the linear systems in Gaussian process regression.
The new stochastic dual descent approach allows Gaussian process regression to perform on par with state-of-the-art graph neural networks for predicting molecular binding affinities. This is a remarkable result, as Gaussian processes are generally considered less scalable than neural networks for large datasets.
Technical Explanation
The core challenge addressed in the paper is that both sampling from the posterior distribution and computing the mean of the posterior in Gaussian process regression requires solving a large linear system of equations. The authors explore the use of stochastic gradient descent as a way to solve these linear systems more efficiently.
Stochastic gradient descent is an optimization technique that updates the solution gradually, rather than solving the entire system at once. The authors show that by incorporating specific insights from the optimization and kernel communities, stochastic gradient descent can be highly effective for this problem.
The authors introduce a stochastic dual descent algorithm, which they describe in an intuitive manner. Through a series of ablation studies, they illustrate the key design choices that make this algorithm effective. Further experiments demonstrate that their new method outperforms both preconditioned conjugate gradients and variational Gaussian process approximations on a range of UCI regression tasks and Bayesian optimization benchmarks.
Notably, the authors show that their Gaussian process regression approach matches the performance of state-of-the-art graph neural networks on the task of predicting molecular binding affinities. This is a remarkable result, as Gaussian processes are generally considered less scalable than neural networks for large datasets.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the proposed stochastic dual descent algorithm, including ablation studies and comparisons to other methods. However, the authors do not discuss any potential limitations or caveats of their approach.
One area for further research could be exploring the behavior of the algorithm on a wider range of problem sizes and datasets, particularly investigating its scalability to truly massive linear systems. The paper focuses on relatively modest-sized problems, so it would be valuable to understand how the method performs as the problem scale increases.
Additionally, the authors do not delve into the theoretical properties of the stochastic dual descent algorithm, such as its convergence rate or stability guarantees. Providing a more in-depth analysis of the underlying mathematics could strengthen the contribution and help readers understand the algorithm's strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and practical solution to the challenge of solving large linear systems in Gaussian process regression. The stochastic dual descent algorithm appears to be a valuable addition to the toolbox of techniques for making Gaussian processes more scalable and competitive with state-of-the-art machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the challenging problem of solving large linear systems in Gaussian process regression, a crucial step for making accurate predictions. By introducing a novel "stochastic dual descent" algorithm that leverages insights from optimization and kernel methods, the authors demonstrate a highly effective approach to this problem.
The key contribution of this work is showing that stochastic gradient descent, when properly designed, can be a powerful tool for solving the linear systems in Gaussian process regression. This allows Gaussian processes to achieve performance on par with advanced neural network models, such as graph neural networks, on tasks like predicting molecular binding affinities.
The results of this paper have the potential to significantly expand the applicability of Gaussian processes, making them more scalable and competitive with other state-of-the-art machine learning techniques. This could lead to wider adoption of Gaussian processes, particularly in domains where their principled probabilistic modeling is advantageous.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Learning Stochastic Population Models by Gradient Descent
Justin N. Kreikemeyer, Philipp Andelfinger, Adelinde M. Uhrmacher
0
0
Increasing effort is put into the development of methods for learning mechanistic models from data. This task entails not only the accurate estimation of parameters but also a suitable model structure. Recent work on the discovery of dynamical systems formulates this problem as a linear equation system. Here, we explore several simulation-based optimization approaches, which allow much greater freedom in the objective formulation and weaker conditions on the available data. We show that even for relatively small stochastic population models, simultaneous estimation of parameters and structure poses major challenges for optimization procedures. Particularly, we investigate the application of the local stochastic gradient descent method, commonly used for training machine learning models. We demonstrate accurate estimation of models but find that enforcing the inference of parsimonious, interpretable models drastically increases the difficulty. We give an outlook on how this challenge can be overcome.
7/1/2024
Derivatives of Stochastic Gradient Descent
Franck Iutzeler, Edouard Pauwels, Samuel Vaiter
0
0
We consider stochastic optimization problems where the objective depends on some parameter, as commonly found in hyperparameter optimization for instance. We investigate the behavior of the derivatives of the iterates of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with respect to that parameter and show that they are driven by an inexact SGD recursion on a different objective function, perturbed by the convergence of the original SGD. This enables us to establish that the derivatives of SGD converge to the derivative of the solution mapping in terms of mean squared error whenever the objective is strongly convex. Specifically, we demonstrate that with constant step-sizes, these derivatives stabilize within a noise ball centered at the solution derivative, and that with vanishing step-sizes they exhibit $O(log(k)^2 / k)$ convergence rates. Additionally, we prove exponential convergence in the interpolation regime. Our theoretical findings are illustrated by numerical experiments on synthetic tasks.
5/28/2024
🏷️
Improving Linear System Solvers for Hyperparameter Optimisation in Iterative Gaussian Processes
Jihao Andreas Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Bruno Mlodozeniec, Javier Antor'an, Jos'e Miguel Hern'andez-Lobato
0
0
Scaling hyperparameter optimisation to very large datasets remains an open problem in the Gaussian process community. This paper focuses on iterative methods, which use linear system solvers, like conjugate gradients, alternating projections or stochastic gradient descent, to construct an estimate of the marginal likelihood gradient. We discuss three key improvements which are applicable across solvers: (i) a pathwise gradient estimator, which reduces the required number of solver iterations and amortises the computational cost of making predictions, (ii) warm starting linear system solvers with the solution from the previous step, which leads to faster solver convergence at the cost of negligible bias, (iii) early stopping linear system solvers after a limited computational budget, which synergises with warm starting, allowing solver progress to accumulate over multiple marginal likelihood steps. These techniques provide speed-ups of up to $72times$ when solving to tolerance, and decrease the average residual norm by up to $7times$ when stopping early.
6/7/2024
Variational Stochastic Gradient Descent for Deep Neural Networks
Haotian Chen, Anna Kuzina, Babak Esmaeili, Jakub M Tomczak
0
0
Optimizing deep neural networks is one of the main tasks in successful deep learning. Current state-of-the-art optimizers are adaptive gradient-based optimization methods such as Adam. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in formulating gradient-based optimizers in a probabilistic framework for better estimation of gradients and modeling uncertainties. Here, we propose to combine both approaches, resulting in the Variational Stochastic Gradient Descent (VSGD) optimizer. We model gradient updates as a probabilistic model and utilize stochastic variational inference (SVI) to derive an efficient and effective update rule. Further, we show how our VSGD method relates to other adaptive gradient-based optimizers like Adam. Lastly, we carry out experiments on two image classification datasets and four deep neural network architectures, where we show that VSGD outperforms Adam and SGD.
4/11/2024