Sum-of-norms clustering does not separate nearby balls

Overview

• Sum-of-norms clustering is a popular convex optimization approach to K-means clustering.
• The paper shows that this method can fail to recover the true clusters when the dataset is made up of points from two very close, uniform distributions.
• This happens even in high dimensions, where the distance between the cluster centers is as large as 2√2.
• The paper introduces and analyzes a continuous version of sum-of-norms clustering to demonstrate this issue.

Plain English Explanation

Sum-of-norms clustering is a way to group data points into clusters, similar to the well-known K-means algorithm. However, the paper shows that this method can struggle when the data actually comes from two very close-together clusters.

Imagine you have a dataset of points that are randomly scattered within two circular regions. Even if these regions are reasonably far apart, sum-of-norms clustering may fail to correctly separate the points into the two original clusters. This is true even in high-dimensional spaces, where the circular regions are quite distant.

To demonstrate this, the paper introduces a "continuous" version of sum-of-norms clustering, which looks at the overall distribution of points rather than individual data points. By analyzing this continuous formulation, the authors are able to show the limitations of the standard sum-of-norms approach, even when the underlying clusters are well-separated.

This research highlights an important limitation of a popular clustering technique, which could be relevant for applications like learning general Gaussian mixtures, approximating distributions with Gaussian mixtures, or learning over-parameterized neural networks. It also connects to research on the curse of dimensionality in mixture models and spectral clustering of Gaussian mixtures.

Technical Explanation

The paper shows that sum-of-norms clustering, a convex relaxation of the K-means objective, can fail to recover the true clustering when the dataset is composed of points drawn from two uniform distributions on disjoint balls of unit radius.

Specifically, the authors consider a setup where the two ball centers are sufficiently close together. They prove that as the dimension of the space increases, sum-of-norms clustering will typically fail to correctly identify the two clusters, even when the distance between the ball centers is as large as 2√2.

To demonstrate this, the paper introduces and analyzes a "continuous" version of sum-of-norms clustering, where the discrete dataset is replaced by a general measure. This continuous formulation allows the authors to provide a local-global characterization of the clustering, which appears to be a new result even for the standard discrete case.

Critical Analysis

The key limitation highlighted in this paper is that sum-of-norms clustering, while a convex relaxation of the challenging K-means objective, can still struggle in certain high-dimensional settings where the underlying clusters are very close together. This is an important caveat to keep in mind when applying this method in practice.

That said, the paper focuses on a somewhat idealized scenario with uniform distributions on balls. It would be interesting to see if similar issues arise with other types of cluster distributions or when there is more heterogeneity within the clusters. The authors also do not provide extensive numerical experiments to quantify the practical impact of this theoretical limitation.

Additionally, while the continuous formulation and associated local-global characterization are technically interesting, it's unclear how directly applicable these insights are to the typical discrete clustering setting. More work may be needed to bridge the gap between the theoretical and practical implications of this research.

Overall, this paper highlights an important limitation of sum-of-norms clustering that is worth considering, especially for high-dimensional applications where the underlying cluster structure may be challenging. Further research could explore the broader relevance of these findings and ways to address the identified issues.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that the popular sum-of-norms clustering method can fail to correctly recover the true cluster structure, even when the underlying clusters are reasonably well-separated. This limitation arises in high-dimensional settings where the clusters are very close together, and persists even when the distance between cluster centers is as large as 2√2.

By introducing and analyzing a continuous formulation of sum-of-norms clustering, the authors are able to provide a theoretical characterization of this issue. This work contributes to our understanding of the strengths and limitations of convex clustering approaches, which could be relevant for a variety of applications involving Gaussian mixture models, over-parameterized neural networks, and the "curse of dimensionality" in mixture models.

Overall, this research highlights an important caveat to keep in mind when applying sum-of-norms clustering, especially in high-dimensional settings with potentially challenging cluster structures. Further work could explore the broader practical implications of these findings and investigate ways to address the identified limitations.