A Survey on Causal Inference for Recommendation

Overview

• This paper discusses the growing interest in causal inference among recommender system (RS) researchers.
• Causal inference offers a framework to model causality in recommender systems, address confounding effects, and deal with counterfactual problems.
• Existing surveys on causal recommendations often classify approaches based on practical issues, which can disperse and fragment the unified causal theories.
• This survey aims to provide a systematic review of causal inference in RS from a coherent causal theoretical perspective, facilitating deeper integration of causal inference in RS.

Plain English Explanation

Recommender systems are algorithms that suggest products, services, or content to users based on their preferences and behavior. Causal inference is a field of study that helps us understand the cause-and-effect relationships between different factors.

Researchers working on recommender systems have become increasingly interested in causal inference because it can provide important insights. For example, causal inference can help identify confounding factors (things that influence both the recommendation and the user's response) and address counterfactual problems (understanding what would have happened if a different recommendation was made).

While there are already some surveys on causal recommendations, they often focus on the practical issues faced by recommender systems. This can make it hard to see the bigger picture and the underlying causal theories. This survey takes a different approach – it reviews the latest research on causal inference in recommender systems from a causal theory perspective.

The goal is to help researchers and practitioners better understand the causal principles behind the various recommender system methods, which can lead to further advancements in the field. The survey covers key causal inference concepts, categorizes existing methods based on the causal theories they employ, and discusses promising directions for future research.

Technical Explanation

This survey paper provides a comprehensive review of the use of causal inference in recommender systems (RS) research. Causal inference is a powerful framework that can help dissect cause-and-effect relationships and address various challenges in recommender systems, such as confounding effects and counterfactual problems.

The authors first introduce the fundamental concepts of causal inference, which serve as the foundation for the rest of the review. They then propose a novel theory-driven taxonomy, categorizing existing causal inference methods in RS based on the specific causal theory employed: the potential outcome framework, the structural causal model, and general counterfactuals.

The paper delves into the technical details of how these causal inference methods are applied to address various recommender system challenges, such as offline policy evaluation and data augmentation. The authors also highlight promising directions for future research in this field, including the integration of causal inference with latent variable models.

Critical Analysis

The survey provides a comprehensive and well-structured review of causal inference in recommender systems, offering a valuable resource for researchers in this field. By organizing the existing methods based on the underlying causal theories, the authors help readers better understand the fundamental principles behind the various approaches.

One potential limitation of the survey is that it may not cover the most recent developments in this rapidly evolving field. As the authors mention, they will be continuously updating the accompanying GitHub repository with new papers and resources, which helps address this concern.

Additionally, the survey focuses primarily on the technical aspects of causal inference in recommender systems, with limited discussion on the practical implications and real-world applications of these methods. Exploring the impact of causal inference on the performance and user experience of recommender systems could be an interesting avenue for future research.

Conclusion

This survey paper represents a significant contribution to the field of recommender systems research by providing a coherent and theory-driven review of causal inference methods. By organizing the existing approaches based on their underlying causal principles, the authors facilitate a deeper understanding of the causal frameworks and their applications in addressing various challenges in recommender systems. The insights and future research directions outlined in the paper can inspire further advancements in the integration of causal inference and recommender systems.