A Survey on Deep Clustering: From the Prior Perspective

Read original: arXiv:2406.19602 - Published 7/2/2024 by Yiding Lu, Haobin Li, Yunfan Li, Yijie Lin, Xi Peng
Total Score

0

A Survey on Deep Clustering: From the Prior Perspective

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of deep clustering techniques, focusing on the role of prior information in improving performance.
  • Deep clustering is a powerful machine learning technique that combines deep neural networks with clustering algorithms to uncover hidden structures in complex data.
  • The authors explore how various types of prior information, such as semantic priors, geometric priors, and task-specific priors, can be leveraged to enhance the effectiveness of deep clustering.

Plain English Explanation

Deep clustering is a way of organizing and understanding complex data by using powerful machine learning techniques. Imagine you have a huge collection of images, and you want to group them together based on their visual similarities, without any prior knowledge about the content of the images. Deep clustering can help you do this automatically, by learning the underlying patterns and structures in the data.

The key idea behind deep clustering is to combine deep neural networks, which are good at extracting meaningful features from raw data, with clustering algorithms, which can group similar data points together. This allows the system to learn a powerful representation of the data, and then use that representation to discover the hidden clusters or groups within the data.

However, the performance of deep clustering can be further improved by incorporating prior information, which is the focus of this paper. For example, if you know that the images are related to a specific task, such as image recognition, you can use that knowledge to guide the clustering process and get better results. Or if you have some understanding of the geometric properties of the data, you can use that to improve the clustering.

The authors of this paper review a wide range of techniques that leverage different types of prior information to enhance the performance of deep clustering. They explain how these priors can be incorporated into the deep learning models, and provide insights into the benefits and challenges of using each type of prior.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by defining the problem of deep clustering, which involves simultaneously learning a feature representation of the data and a set of cluster assignments. The authors then delve into the various types of prior information that can be used to improve deep clustering performance.

One type of prior is semantic priors, which capture high-level, task-specific knowledge about the data. For example, if the data consists of images of different objects, the system may have prior knowledge about the taxonomic relationships between those objects. Incorporating this knowledge can help the clustering algorithm discover more meaningful and interpretable groupings.

Another type of prior is geometric priors, which encode information about the underlying structure or manifold of the data. This is particularly relevant for 3D point cloud data, where the spatial relationships between data points are crucial for effective clustering.

The paper also discusses task-specific priors, which are tailored to the particular application domain or problem at hand. For instance, in a medical imaging task, prior knowledge about the expected shapes and distributions of anatomical structures could be leveraged to guide the deep clustering process.

The authors review a diverse set of deep clustering algorithms that incorporate these different types of priors, and provide a detailed analysis of their strengths, weaknesses, and trade-offs. They also highlight important considerations, such as the need for effective prior elicitation and the potential for prior information to introduce biases or constrain the clustering solutions.

Critical Analysis

One of the key strengths of this paper is its comprehensive and systematic approach to surveying the role of priors in deep clustering. The authors have done an excellent job of highlighting the diverse ways in which prior information can be incorporated into deep clustering models, and the potential benefits and challenges of each approach.

However, the paper also acknowledges some important limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that the effective elicitation and incorporation of prior information can be a non-trivial task, and that there is a risk of introducing biases or overly constraining the clustering solutions. Additionally, the paper suggests that more work is needed to develop principled methods for evaluating the impact and reliability of the prior information used in deep clustering.

Another potential area of concern is the potential for deep clustering techniques to perpetuate or exacerbate societal biases, particularly when the prior information used is derived from human-curated sources or reflects historical inequities. The authors do not extensively address this issue, and it would be valuable for future research to explore the ethical implications and potential mitigation strategies for deep clustering in sensitive domains.

Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive and insightful overview of the role of priors in deep clustering, and serves as an excellent starting point for researchers and practitioners interested in leveraging the power of prior information to enhance the performance and interpretability of their deep clustering models.

Conclusion

This survey paper offers a thorough exploration of the role of prior information in deep clustering, a powerful machine learning technique that combines deep neural networks and clustering algorithms to uncover hidden structures in complex data. The authors delve into various types of priors, including semantic, geometric, and task-specific priors, and demonstrate how they can be effectively incorporated into deep clustering models to improve performance and interpretability.

The paper provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field of deep clustering, as it not only reviews the state-of-the-art techniques but also highlights important considerations and areas for future research. By understanding the potential benefits and challenges of leveraging prior information in deep clustering, researchers can develop more effective and responsible solutions for a wide range of applications, from image recognition to medical imaging and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Survey on Deep Clustering: From the Prior Perspective
Total Score

0

A Survey on Deep Clustering: From the Prior Perspective

Yiding Lu, Haobin Li, Yunfan Li, Yijie Lin, Xi Peng

Facilitated by the powerful feature extraction ability of neural networks, deep clustering has achieved great success in analyzing high-dimensional and complex real-world data. The performance of deep clustering methods is affected by various factors such as network structures and learning objectives. However, as pointed out in this survey, the essence of deep clustering lies in the incorporation and utilization of prior knowledge, which is largely ignored by existing works. From pioneering deep clustering methods based on data structure assumptions to recent contrastive clustering methods based on data augmentation invariances, the development of deep clustering intrinsically corresponds to the evolution of prior knowledge. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of deep clustering methods by categorizing them into six types of prior knowledge. We find that in general the prior innovation follows two trends, namely, i) from mining to constructing, and ii) from internal to external. Besides, we provide a benchmark on five widely-used datasets and analyze the performance of methods with diverse priors. By providing a novel prior knowledge perspective, we hope this survey could provide some novel insights and inspire future research in the deep clustering community.

Read more

7/2/2024

Learning 3D Robotics Perception using Inductive Priors
Total Score

0

Learning 3D Robotics Perception using Inductive Priors

Muhammad Zubair Irshad

Recent advances in deep learning have led to a data-centric intelligence i.e. artificially intelligent models unlocking the potential to ingest a large amount of data and be really good at performing digital tasks such as text-to-image generation, machine-human conversation, and image recognition. This thesis covers the topic of learning with structured inductive bias and priors to design approaches and algorithms unlocking the potential of principle-centric intelligence. Prior knowledge (priors for short), often available in terms of past experience as well as assumptions of how the world works, helps the autonomous agent generalize better and adapt their behavior based on past experience. In this thesis, I demonstrate the use of prior knowledge in three different robotics perception problems. 1. object-centric 3D reconstruction, 2. vision and language for decision-making, and 3. 3D scene understanding. To solve these challenging problems, I propose various sources of prior knowledge including 1. geometry and appearance priors from synthetic data, 2. modularity and semantic map priors and 3. semantic, structural, and contextual priors. I study these priors for solving robotics 3D perception tasks and propose ways to efficiently encode them in deep learning models. Some priors are used to warm-start the network for transfer learning, others are used as hard constraints to restrict the action space of robotics agents. While classical techniques are brittle and fail to generalize to unseen scenarios and data-centric approaches require a large amount of labeled data, this thesis aims to build intelligent agents which require very-less real-world data or data acquired only from simulation to generalize to highly dynamic and cluttered environments in novel simulations (i.e. sim2sim) or real-world unseen environments (i.e. sim2real) for a holistic scene understanding of the 3D world.

Read more

6/3/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Advanced Graph Clustering Methods: A Comprehensive and In-Depth Analysis

Timoth'e Watteau (UTBM), Aubin Bonnefoy (UTBM), Simon Illouz-Laurent (UTBM), Joaquim Jusseau (UTBM), Serge Iovleff (UTBM)

Graph clustering, which aims to divide a graph into several homogeneous groups, is a critical area of study with applications that span various fields such as social network analysis, bioinformatics, and image segmentation. This paper explores both traditional and more recent approaches to graph clustering. Firstly, key concepts and definitions in graph theory are introduced. The background section covers essential topics, including graph Laplacians and the integration of Deep Learning in graph analysis. The paper then delves into traditional clustering methods, including Spectral Clustering and the Leiden algorithm. Following this, state-of-the-art clustering techniques that leverage deep learning are examined. A comprehensive comparison of these methods is made through experiments. The paper concludes with a discussion of the practical applications of graph clustering and potential future research directions.

Read more

7/15/2024

Scaling Up Deep Clustering Methods Beyond ImageNet-1K
Total Score

0

Scaling Up Deep Clustering Methods Beyond ImageNet-1K

Nikolas Adaloglou, Felix Michels, Kaspar Senft, Diana Petrusheva, Markus Kollmann

Deep image clustering methods are typically evaluated on small-scale balanced classification datasets while feature-based $k$-means has been applied on proprietary billion-scale datasets. In this work, we explore the performance of feature-based deep clustering approaches on large-scale benchmarks whilst disentangling the impact of the following data-related factors: i) class imbalance, ii) class granularity, iii) easy-to-recognize classes, and iv) the ability to capture multiple classes. Consequently, we develop multiple new benchmarks based on ImageNet21K. Our experimental analysis reveals that feature-based $k$-means is often unfairly evaluated on balanced datasets. However, deep clustering methods outperform $k$-means across most large-scale benchmarks. Interestingly, $k$-means underperforms on easy-to-classify benchmarks by large margins. The performance gap, however, diminishes on the highest data regimes such as ImageNet21K. Finally, we find that non-primary cluster predictions capture meaningful classes (i.e. coarser classes).

Read more

6/4/2024