A Survey on Failure Analysis and Fault Injection in AI Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey on failure analysis and fault injection techniques for AI systems.
- It explores the importance of understanding and mitigating failures in AI-powered applications, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in critical domains like self-driving cars, healthcare, and finance.
- The paper covers various approaches to characterizing and mitigating insufficiencies in automated driving systems, explainable AI techniques for accurate fault detection, and reasons why explanations may fail in AI systems.
- It also discusses the growing issue of fake AI-generated content and the need to ensure the resilience of deep learning applications.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on understanding and dealing with failures in AI systems, which are becoming increasingly important as AI is used in more critical applications. AI is now used in things like self-driving cars, healthcare, and finance, so it's crucial that we can identify and fix problems with these AI systems.
The paper looks at different ways to analyze failures in AI systems and intentionally introduce faults to test how the systems respond. This can help us understand the weaknesses and limitations of AI, so we can make the systems more reliable and trustworthy.
For example, the paper discusses research on identifying issues with automated driving systems, developing AI techniques to accurately detect faults, and understanding why the explanations provided by AI systems may not always be accurate or helpful.
The paper also touches on the growing problem of fake AI-generated content, which can be used to spread misinformation, and the importance of ensuring that deep learning systems are resilient and can withstand disruptions or failures.
Overall, the goal of this research is to make AI systems more robust and dependable, so we can have confidence in using them for important real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive survey of failure analysis and fault injection techniques for AI systems. It covers a range of approaches, including characterizing and mitigating insufficiencies in automated driving systems, using explainable AI techniques for accurate fault detection, and understanding why explanations provided by AI systems may fail.
The paper also discusses the growing issue of fake AI-generated content and the need to ensure the resilience of deep learning applications in the face of disruptions or failures.
The researchers emphasize the importance of understanding and mitigating failures in AI-powered applications, as these systems are becoming increasingly prevalent in critical domains. By analyzing the types of failures that can occur and developing techniques to deliberately introduce faults, the researchers aim to gain insights that can improve the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured survey of the current state of research on failure analysis and fault injection in AI systems. However, it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further exploration.
One notable limitation is the evolving nature of the field, which means that some of the techniques and case studies discussed in the paper may already be outdated or superseded by more recent developments. The researchers encourage readers to stay up-to-date with the latest advancements in this rapidly changing domain.
Additionally, the paper emphasizes the need for more standardized benchmarks and evaluation frameworks to assess the effectiveness of different failure analysis and fault injection techniques. Without such standards, it can be challenging to compare and combine insights from various research efforts.
Another area for further research is the potential unintended consequences of fault injection techniques. While these methods can provide valuable insights, they may also introduce new vulnerabilities or risks if not carefully designed and implemented.
Overall, the paper offers a comprehensive and thought-provoking overview of an important and rapidly evolving field. It serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working to improve the reliability and robustness of AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of failure analysis and fault injection techniques for AI systems, which are becoming increasingly crucial as AI is deployed in more critical applications. The researchers explore various approaches, including characterizing and mitigating issues in automated driving systems, using explainable AI for fault detection, and understanding why AI explanations may fail.
The paper also discusses the growing problem of fake AI-generated content and the need to ensure the resilience of deep learning applications. By understanding and mitigating failures in AI systems, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of these technologies, which have far-reaching implications for society.
While the paper acknowledges limitations and areas for further research, it serves as an important resource for the AI research community and highlights the critical importance of continued work in this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Survey on Failure Analysis and Fault Injection in AI Systems
Guangba Yu, Gou Tan, Haojia Huang, Zhenyu Zhang, Pengfei Chen, Roberto Natella, Zibin Zheng
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to its integration into various areas, especially with Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly enhancing capabilities in Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC). However, the complexity of AI systems has also exposed their vulnerabilities, necessitating robust methods for failure analysis (FA) and fault injection (FI) to ensure resilience and reliability. Despite the importance of these techniques, there lacks a comprehensive review of FA and FI methodologies in AI systems. This study fills this gap by presenting a detailed survey of existing FA and FI approaches across six layers of AI systems. We systematically analyze 160 papers and repositories to answer three research questions including (1) what are the prevalent failures in AI systems, (2) what types of faults can current FI tools simulate, (3) what gaps exist between the simulated faults and real-world failures. Our findings reveal a taxonomy of AI system failures, assess the capabilities of existing FI tools, and highlight discrepancies between real-world and simulated failures. Moreover, this survey contributes to the field by providing a framework for fault diagnosis, evaluating the state-of-the-art in FI, and identifying areas for improvement in FI techniques to enhance the resilience of AI systems.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Reporting Risks in AI-based Assistive Technology Research: A Systematic Review
Zahra Ahmadi, Peter R. Lewis, Mahadeo A. Sukhai
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly employed to enhance assistive technologies, yet it can fail in various ways. We conducted a systematic literature review of research into AI-based assistive technology for persons with visual impairments. Our study shows that most proposed technologies with a testable prototype have not been evaluated in a human study with members of the sight-loss community. Furthermore, many studies did not consider or report failure cases or possible risks. These findings highlight the importance of inclusive system evaluations and the necessity of standardizing methods for presenting and analyzing failure cases and threats when developing AI-based assistive technologies.
Read more7/22/2024
š
0
Characterization and Mitigation of Insufficiencies in Automated Driving Systems
Yuting Fu, Jochen Seemann, Caspar Hanselaar, Tim Beurskens, Andrei Terechko, Emilia Silvas, Maurice Heemels
Automated Driving (AD) systems have the potential to increase safety, comfort and energy efficiency. Recently, major automotive companies have started testing and validating AD systems (ADS) on public roads. Nevertheless, the commercial deployment and wide adoption of ADS have been moderate, partially due to system functional insufficiencies (FI) that undermine passenger safety and lead to hazardous situations on the road. FIs are defined in ISO 21448 Safety Of The Intended Functionality (SOTIF). FIs are insufficiencies in sensors, actuators and algorithm implementations, including neural networks and probabilistic calculations. Examples of FIs in ADS include inaccurate ego-vehicle localization on the road, incorrect prediction of a cyclist maneuver, unreliable detection of a pedestrian, etc. The main goal of our study is to formulate a generic architectural design pattern, which is compatible with existing methods and ADS, to improve FI mitigation and enable faster commercial deployment of ADS. First, we studied the 2021 autonomous vehicles disengagement reports published by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The data clearly show that disengagements are five times more often caused by FIs rather than by system faults. We then made a comprehensive list of insufficiencies and their characteristics by analyzing over 10 hours of publicly available road test videos. In particular, we identified insufficiency types in four major categories: world model, motion plan, traffic rule, and operational design domain. The insufficiency characterization helps making the SOTIF analyses of triggering conditions more systematic and comprehensive. Based on our FI characterization, simulation experiments and literature survey, we define a novel generic architectural design pattern Daruma to dynamically select the channel that is least likely to have a FI at the moment.
Read more4/16/2024
š
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Accurate Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Review
Ahmed Maged, Salah Haridy, Herman Shen
As the manufacturing industry advances with sensor integration and automation, the opaque nature of deep learning models in machine learning poses a significant challenge for fault detection and diagnosis. And despite the related predictive insights Artificial Intelligence (AI) can deliver, advanced machine learning engines often remain a black box. This paper reviews the eXplainable AI (XAI) tools and techniques in this context. We explore various XAI methodologies, focusing on their role in making AI decision-making transparent, particularly in critical scenarios where humans are involved. We also discuss current limitations and potential future research that aims to balance explainability with model performance while improving trustworthiness in the context of AI applications for critical industrial use cases.
Read more6/11/2024