SymTax: Symbiotic Relationship and Taxonomy Fusion for Effective Citation Recommendation

Read original: arXiv:2406.01606 - Published 6/5/2024 by Karan Goyal, Mayank Goel, Vikram Goyal, Mukesh Mohania
Total Score

0

SymTax: Symbiotic Relationship and Taxonomy Fusion for Effective Citation Recommendation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a novel approach called "SymTax" that combines symbiotic relationship learning and taxonomy fusion to improve citation recommendation.
  • SymTax leverages the symbiotic relationship between papers and citations, as well as the taxonomic structure of research fields, to enhance the accuracy and interpretability of citation recommendations.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SymTax on several benchmark datasets, showing improved performance over existing citation recommendation methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new technique called "SymTax" that aims to make citation recommendation more effective. Citation recommendation is the process of suggesting relevant references or sources that a researcher should consider citing in their work.

SymTax works by taking advantage of two key ideas:

  1. Symbiotic Relationship: The relationship between a paper and the citations it receives is symbiotic, meaning they influence each other. By understanding this relationship, SymTax can better predict which citations would be most relevant for a given paper.

  2. Taxonomy Fusion: Research fields have inherent taxonomic structures, with high-level topics branching into more specific sub-topics. SymTax incorporates this taxonomic information to better understand the context and relationships between papers, which can improve the quality of citation recommendations.

By combining these two concepts - the symbiotic relationship between papers and citations, and the taxonomic structure of research fields - SymTax is able to provide more accurate and meaningful citation recommendations compared to existing methods. This can be particularly helpful for researchers who are writing papers and need guidance on which references to include.

Technical Explanation

The core of the SymTax approach is the integration of two key components:

  1. Symbiotic Relationship Learning: SymTax models the symbiotic relationship between papers and their citations using a graph neural network. This allows the system to capture the mutual influence between a paper and the citations it receives, as well as the relationships between the cited papers themselves.

  2. Taxonomy Fusion: SymTax incorporates taxonomic information about research fields by constructing a hierarchical taxonomy from the citation network. This taxonomic structure is then fused with the symbiotic relationship model to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the context and relevance of potential citations.

The authors evaluate SymTax on several benchmark datasets for citation recommendation, comparing its performance to state-of-the-art methods. The results show that SymTax consistently outperforms other approaches, demonstrating the benefits of the symbiotic relationship learning and taxonomy fusion components.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the SymTax approach, using multiple benchmark datasets and comparing it to relevant baselines. The authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the potential need for more sophisticated taxonomic construction methods and the challenge of effectively integrating heterogeneous data sources.

One area that could be explored further is the interpretability of the SymTax recommendations. While the paper mentions that the approach provides more interpretable results, it would be valuable to delve deeper into the specific mechanisms that enable this and how the taxonomy fusion process contributes to the interpretability of the recommendations.

Additionally, the paper could have discussed potential biases or limitations in the citation data used for training and evaluation, as these factors can significantly impact the performance and generalization of citation recommendation systems.

Conclusion

The SymTax approach presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in citation recommendation research. By leveraging the symbiotic relationship between papers and citations, as well as the taxonomic structure of research fields, SymTax demonstrates improved accuracy and interpretability compared to existing methods.

The successful integration of these two key concepts - symbiotic relationship learning and taxonomy fusion - highlights the potential of combining multiple complementary sources of information to enhance citation recommendation systems. This work could have important implications for researchers, particularly those in fields where effectively managing and navigating the relevant literature is crucial for the success of their work.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

SymTax: Symbiotic Relationship and Taxonomy Fusion for Effective Citation Recommendation
Total Score

0

SymTax: Symbiotic Relationship and Taxonomy Fusion for Effective Citation Recommendation

Karan Goyal, Mayank Goel, Vikram Goyal, Mukesh Mohania

Citing pertinent literature is pivotal to writing and reviewing a scientific document. Existing techniques mainly focus on the local context or the global context for recommending citations but fail to consider the actual human citation behaviour. We propose SymTax, a three-stage recommendation architecture that considers both the local and the global context, and additionally the taxonomical representations of query-candidate tuples and the Symbiosis prevailing amongst them. SymTax learns to embed the infused taxonomies in the hyperbolic space and uses hyperbolic separation as a latent feature to compute query-candidate similarity. We build a novel and large dataset ArSyTa containing 8.27 million citation contexts and describe the creation process in detail. We conduct extensive experiments and ablation studies to demonstrate the effectiveness and design choice of each module in our framework. Also, combinatorial analysis from our experiments shed light on the choice of language models (LMs) and fusion embedding, and the inclusion of section heading as a signal. Our proposed module that captures the symbiotic relationship solely leads to performance gains of 26.66% and 39.25% in Recall@5 w.r.t. SOTA on ACL-200 and RefSeer datasets, respectively. The complete framework yields a gain of 22.56% in Recall@5 wrt SOTA on our proposed dataset. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/goyalkaraniit/SymTax

Read more

6/5/2024

Judgement Citation Retrieval using Contextual Similarity
Total Score

0

Judgement Citation Retrieval using Contextual Similarity

Akshat Mohan Dasula, Hrushitha Tigulla, Preethika Bhukya

Traditionally in the domain of legal research, the retrieval of pertinent citations from intricate case descriptions has demanded manual effort and keyword-based search applications that mandate expertise in understanding legal jargon. Legal case descriptions hold pivotal information for legal professionals and researchers, necessitating more efficient and automated approaches. We propose a methodology that combines natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to enhance the organization and utilization of legal case descriptions. This approach revolves around the creation of textual embeddings with the help of state-of-art embedding models. Our methodology addresses two primary objectives: unsupervised clustering and supervised citation retrieval, both designed to automate the citation extraction process. Although the proposed methodology can be used for any dataset, we employed the Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS) dataset, yielding remarkable results. Our methodology achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 90.9%. By automating labor-intensive processes, we pave the way for a more efficient, time-saving, and accessible landscape in legal research, benefiting legal professionals, academics, and researchers.

Read more

8/16/2024

Taxes Are All You Need: Integration of Taxonomical Hierarchy Relationships into the Contrastive Loss
Total Score

0

Taxes Are All You Need: Integration of Taxonomical Hierarchy Relationships into the Contrastive Loss

Kiran Kokilepersaud, Yavuz Yarici, Mohit Prabhushankar, Ghassan AlRegib

In this work, we propose a novel supervised contrastive loss that enables the integration of taxonomic hierarchy information during the representation learning process. A supervised contrastive loss operates by enforcing that images with the same class label (positive samples) project closer to each other than images with differing class labels (negative samples). The advantage of this approach is that it directly penalizes the structure of the representation space itself. This enables greater flexibility with respect to encoding semantic concepts. However, the standard supervised contrastive loss only enforces semantic structure based on the downstream task (i.e. the class label). In reality, the class label is only one level of a emph{hierarchy of different semantic relationships known as a taxonomy}. For example, the class label is oftentimes the species of an animal, but between different classes there are higher order relationships such as all animals with wings being ``birds. We show that by explicitly accounting for these relationships with a weighting penalty in the contrastive loss we can out-perform the supervised contrastive loss. Additionally, we demonstrate the adaptability of the notion of a taxonomy by integrating our loss into medical and noise-based settings that show performance improvements by as much as 7%.

Read more

6/12/2024

Total Score

0

Taxonomy Completion with Probabilistic Scorer via Box Embedding

Wei Xue, Yongliang Shen, Wenqi Ren, Jietian Guo, Shiliang Pu, Weiming Lu

Taxonomy completion, enriching existing taxonomies by inserting new concepts as parents or attaching them as children, has gained significant interest. Previous approaches embed concepts as vectors in Euclidean space, which makes it difficult to model asymmetric relations in taxonomy. In addition, they introduce pseudo-leaves to convert attachment cases into insertion cases, leading to an incorrect bias in network learning dominated by numerous pseudo-leaves. Addressing these, our framework, TaxBox, leverages box containment and center closeness to design two specialized geometric scorers within the box embedding space. These scorers are tailored for insertion and attachment operations and can effectively capture intrinsic relationships between concepts by optimizing on a granular box constraint loss. We employ a dynamic ranking loss mechanism to balance the scores from these scorers, allowing adaptive adjustments of insertion and attachment scores. Experiments on four real-world datasets show that TaxBox significantly outperforms previous methods, yielding substantial improvements over prior methods in real-world datasets, with average performance boosts of 6.7%, 34.9%, and 51.4% in MRR, Hit@1, and Prec@1, respectively.

Read more

6/19/2024