Taxes Are All You Need: Integration of Taxonomical Hierarchy Relationships into the Contrastive Loss

Read original: arXiv:2406.06848 - Published 6/12/2024 by Kiran Kokilepersaud, Yavuz Yarici, Mohit Prabhushankar, Ghassan AlRegib
Total Score

0

Taxes Are All You Need: Integration of Taxonomical Hierarchy Relationships into the Contrastive Loss

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach to integrate taxonomical hierarchy relationships into the contrastive loss function for improved multi-label classification performance.
  • The authors introduce "Taxes," a method that leverages the semantic relationships between classes in a hierarchical taxonomy to better guide the model's learning process.
  • The key idea is to encourage the model to learn representations that not only separate positive and negative classes, but also respect the inherent structure of the class hierarchy.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, multi-label classification is a common task where the goal is to predict multiple labels for a given input. For example, a model might need to classify an image as containing both "dog" and "grass." Exploring Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Multi-Label and Bayesian Learning Driven Prototypical Contrastive Loss for Class-Imbalanced Multi-Label Classification have explored related ideas in this domain.

The authors of this paper recognized that traditional approaches to multi-label classification often neglect the inherent hierarchical relationships between the labels. For instance, "poodle" is a type of "dog," and "grass" is a type of "plant." Incorporating this taxonomical structure could provide valuable guidance to the model during training.

The proposed "Taxes" method does this by modifying the contrastive loss function, which is a common technique for learning discriminative representations. Normally, the contrastive loss encourages the model to pull representations of positive examples closer together and push negative examples further apart. The Taxes approach extends this by also considering the hierarchical relationships between the classes. This means the model will learn representations that not only separate positive and negative examples, but also respect the semantic similarities and differences encoded in the class taxonomy.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Taxes on several multi-label classification benchmarks, showing it can outperform standard contrastive learning approaches. This suggests that leveraging taxonomical information can be a powerful way to improve model performance, especially in domains with rich hierarchical structure, such as Zero-Shot Hierarchical Classification with the Common Procurement Vocabulary.

Technical Explanation

The key technical innovation in this paper is the integration of taxonomical hierarchy relationships into the contrastive loss function. Traditionally, the contrastive loss encourages the model to learn representations that pull positive examples closer together and push negative examples further apart. The authors extend this by also considering the hierarchical relationships between the classes.

Specifically, the Taxes loss function has three components:

  1. Positive Similarity: This term encourages positive examples to have similar representations, as in standard contrastive learning.
  2. Negative Dissimilarity: This term pushes negative examples apart, also as in standard contrastive learning.
  3. Hierarchical Similarity: This novel term encourages the model to learn representations that respect the taxonomical structure. Semantically similar classes (e.g., "poodle" and "dog") will have closer representations, while more distant classes (e.g., "poodle" and "grass") will be further apart.

By balancing these three objectives, the Taxes method can learn representations that not only separate positive and negative examples, but also capture the inherent relationships between the classes. The authors show that this leads to improved multi-label classification performance compared to standard contrastive learning approaches.

This work builds on prior research in Semantic Loss for Ontology-based Classification and Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Models, which have explored ways to leverage taxonomical information in machine learning models.

Critical Analysis

The Taxes approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards integrating rich semantic information into the training of multi-label classification models. By considering the hierarchical relationships between classes, the authors have shown that the model can learn more meaningful and discriminative representations.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For instance, the authors only evaluate Taxes on a limited set of benchmark datasets. It would be valuable to see how the method performs on a wider range of real-world multi-label classification problems, especially those with more complex or ambiguous taxonomical structures.

Additionally, the authors do not provide much insight into the computational complexity of the Taxes loss function or the sensitivity of the method to hyperparameter settings. These aspects could be important considerations for practitioners looking to apply the technique in practical applications.

Finally, the paper could have discussed potential negative societal impacts or ethical concerns that may arise from deploying multi-label classification models, especially in domains with sensitive or biased taxonomical information. Addressing these types of considerations is important for ensuring the responsible development and deployment of such systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative approach called "Taxes" that integrates taxonomical hierarchy relationships into the contrastive loss function for multi-label classification. By encouraging the model to learn representations that respect the inherent structure of the class taxonomy, Taxes can outperform standard contrastive learning methods on several benchmarks.

The core idea of leveraging semantic relationships to guide model training is a promising direction for improving the performance and interpretability of multi-label classification systems. As machine learning models become more widely deployed in real-world applications, techniques like Taxes that can incorporate domain-specific knowledge will likely become increasingly important.

Overall, this work contributes a novel and effective approach to an important problem in the field of machine learning, with potential implications for a wide range of classification tasks involving hierarchical data structures.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Taxes Are All You Need: Integration of Taxonomical Hierarchy Relationships into the Contrastive Loss
Total Score

0

Taxes Are All You Need: Integration of Taxonomical Hierarchy Relationships into the Contrastive Loss

Kiran Kokilepersaud, Yavuz Yarici, Mohit Prabhushankar, Ghassan AlRegib

In this work, we propose a novel supervised contrastive loss that enables the integration of taxonomic hierarchy information during the representation learning process. A supervised contrastive loss operates by enforcing that images with the same class label (positive samples) project closer to each other than images with differing class labels (negative samples). The advantage of this approach is that it directly penalizes the structure of the representation space itself. This enables greater flexibility with respect to encoding semantic concepts. However, the standard supervised contrastive loss only enforces semantic structure based on the downstream task (i.e. the class label). In reality, the class label is only one level of a emph{hierarchy of different semantic relationships known as a taxonomy}. For example, the class label is oftentimes the species of an animal, but between different classes there are higher order relationships such as all animals with wings being ``birds. We show that by explicitly accounting for these relationships with a weighting penalty in the contrastive loss we can out-perform the supervised contrastive loss. Additionally, we demonstrate the adaptability of the notion of a taxonomy by integrating our loss into medical and noise-based settings that show performance improvements by as much as 7%.

Read more

6/12/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

A semantic loss for ontology classification

Simon Flugel, Martin Glauer, Till Mossakowski, Fabian Neuhaus

Deep learning models are often unaware of the inherent constraints of the task they are applied to. However, many downstream tasks require logical consistency. For ontology classification tasks, such constraints include subsumption and disjointness relations between classes. In order to increase the consistency of deep learning models, we propose a fuzzy loss that combines label-based loss with terms penalising subsumption- or disjointness-violations. Our evaluation on the ChEBI ontology shows that the fuzzy loss is able to decrease the number of consistency violations by several orders of magnitude without decreasing the classification performance. In addition, we use the fuzzy loss for unsupervised learning. We show that this can further improve consistency on data from a

Read more

8/20/2024

Learning Hierarchical Semantic Classification by Grounding on Consistent Image Segmentations
Total Score

0

Learning Hierarchical Semantic Classification by Grounding on Consistent Image Segmentations

Seulki Park, Youren Zhang, Stella X. Yu, Sara Beery, Jonathan Huang

Hierarchical semantic classification requires the prediction of a taxonomy tree instead of a single flat level of the tree, where both accuracies at individual levels and consistency across levels matter. We can train classifiers for individual levels, which has accuracy but not consistency, or we can train only the finest level classification and infer higher levels, which has consistency but not accuracy. Our key insight is that hierarchical recognition should not be treated as multi-task classification, as each level is essentially a different task and they would have to compromise with each other, but be grounded on image segmentations that are consistent across semantic granularities. Consistency can in fact improve accuracy. We build upon recent work on learning hierarchical segmentation for flat-level recognition, and extend it to hierarchical recognition. It naturally captures the intuition that fine-grained recognition requires fine image segmentation whereas coarse-grained recognition requires coarse segmentation; they can all be integrated into one recognition model that drives fine-to-coarse internal visual parsing.Additionally, we introduce a Tree-path KL Divergence loss to enforce consistent accurate predictions across levels. Our extensive experimentation and analysis demonstrate our significant gains on predicting an accurate and consistent taxonomy tree.

Read more

6/18/2024

Acoustic identification of individual animals with hierarchical contrastive learning
Total Score

0

New!Acoustic identification of individual animals with hierarchical contrastive learning

Ines Nolasco, Ilyass Moummad, Dan Stowell, Emmanouil Benetos

Acoustic identification of individual animals (AIID) is closely related to audio-based species classification but requires a finer level of detail to distinguish between individual animals within the same species. In this work, we frame AIID as a hierarchical multi-label classification task and propose the use of hierarchy-aware loss functions to learn robust representations of individual identities that maintain the hierarchical relationships among species and taxa. Our results demonstrate that hierarchical embeddings not only enhance identification accuracy at the individual level but also at higher taxonomic levels, effectively preserving the hierarchical structure in the learned representations. By comparing our approach with non-hierarchical models, we highlight the advantage of enforcing this structure in the embedding space. Additionally, we extend the evaluation to the classification of novel individual classes, demonstrating the potential of our method in open-set classification scenarios.

Read more

9/16/2024