A Synthetic Benchmarking Pipeline to Compare Camera Calibration Algorithms

Read original: arXiv:2307.01013 - Published 8/20/2024 by Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou, Lars Krupp, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz
Total Score

0

A Synthetic Benchmarking Pipeline to Compare Camera Calibration Algorithms

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • SynthCal is a synthetic camera calibration benchmarking pipeline that generates images of calibration patterns.
  • It enables accurate quantification of calibration algorithm performance.
  • Measuring camera parameters in the real world is challenging, and there needs to be a dataset with ground truth to evaluate calibration algorithms.

Plain English Explanation

SynthCal is a tool that creates simulated images for testing camera calibration algorithms. Camera calibration is the process of determining the internal parameters of a camera, such as the focal length, lens distortion, and sensor size. Accurate camera calibration is essential for many computer vision applications, like 3D reconstruction, augmented reality, and robotics.

However, measuring these parameters in the real world can be difficult and time-consuming. SynthCal solves this problem by generating synthetic images of calibration patterns, like checkerboards or dot grids, with known ground truth values. This allows researchers to test and compare different calibration algorithms without the hassle of setting up real-world experiments.

By using a simulated environment, SynthCal can precisely control factors like camera position, lighting, and pattern geometry, which can be challenging to replicate in the physical world. This enables a more rigorous and systematic evaluation of calibration techniques, helping researchers identify their strengths and weaknesses.

Technical Explanation

SynthCal is a synthetic camera calibration benchmarking pipeline that generates images of calibration patterns to enable accurate quantification of calibration algorithm performance. The authors identify that measuring camera parameters in the real world is challenging and arduous, and there needs to be a dataset with ground truth to evaluate calibration algorithms' accuracy.

The SynthCal pipeline consists of several components:

  1. Calibration Pattern Generation: SynthCal can generate various calibration patterns, such as checkerboards and dot grids, with known ground truth parameters.
  2. Camera Model Simulation: The pipeline simulates camera models, including their intrinsic parameters (e.g., focal length, principal point) and extrinsic parameters (e.g., position, orientation).
  3. Image Rendering: SynthCal renders the calibration patterns under different lighting conditions, camera viewpoints, and other environmental factors to create a diverse set of synthetic images.
  4. Evaluation Metrics: The pipeline provides a set of evaluation metrics to quantify the accuracy of calibration algorithms, such as the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of estimated parameters compared to the ground truth.

By using a synthetic approach, SynthCal allows researchers to systematically test and compare camera calibration algorithms in a controlled environment, overcoming the challenges of real-world data collection and measurement.

Critical Analysis

The authors of the SynthCal paper acknowledge that while their synthetic pipeline provides a valuable tool for benchmarking camera calibration algorithms, it has some limitations. For example, the simulated images may not fully capture the complexities and nuances of real-world camera data, such as sensor noise, optical aberrations, and environmental factors.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational requirements or the scalability of the SynthCal pipeline, which could be a concern for researchers working with large-scale datasets or complex camera setups.

Further research could explore ways to enhance the realism of the synthetic images, such as incorporating machine learning-based techniques to model real-world camera characteristics. Investigating the integration of SynthCal with real-world calibration datasets could also provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the synthetic approach.

Conclusion

SynthCal is a promising synthetic camera calibration benchmarking pipeline that addresses the challenges of measuring camera parameters in the real world. By generating images with known ground truth, SynthCal enables researchers to rigorously evaluate and compare camera calibration algorithms, which is essential for advancing computer vision applications. Although the synthetic approach has its limitations, SynthCal represents a significant step towards a more systematic and quantitative evaluation of calibration techniques, paving the way for further developments in this important field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Synthetic Benchmarking Pipeline to Compare Camera Calibration Algorithms
Total Score

0

A Synthetic Benchmarking Pipeline to Compare Camera Calibration Algorithms

Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou, Lars Krupp, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz

Accurate camera calibration is crucial for various computer vision applications. However, measuring calibration accuracy in the real world is challenging due to the lack of datasets with ground truth to evaluate them. In this paper, we present SynthCal, a synthetic camera calibration benchmarking pipeline that generates images of calibration patterns to measure and enable accurate quantification of calibration algorithm performance in camera parameter estimation. We present a SynthCal generated calibration dataset with four common patterns, two camera types, and two environments with varying view, distortion, lighting, and noise levels for both monocular and multi-camera systems. The dataset evaluates both single and multi-view calibration algorithms by measuring re-projection and root-mean-square errors for identical patterns and camera settings. Additionally, we analyze the significance of different patterns using different calibration configurations. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of SynthCal in evaluating various calibration algorithms and patterns.

Read more

8/20/2024

🤿

Total Score

2

Deep Learning for Camera Calibration and Beyond: A Survey

Kang Liao, Lang Nie, Shujuan Huang, Chunyu Lin, Jing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Moncef Gabbouj, Dacheng Tao

Camera calibration involves estimating camera parameters to infer geometric features from captured sequences, which is crucial for computer vision and robotics. However, conventional calibration is laborious and requires dedicated collection. Recent efforts show that learning-based solutions have the potential to be used in place of the repeatability works of manual calibrations. Among these solutions, various learning strategies, networks, geometric priors, and datasets have been investigated. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of learning-based camera calibration techniques, by analyzing their strengths and limitations. Our main calibration categories include the standard pinhole camera model, distortion camera model, cross-view model, and cross-sensor model, following the research trend and extended applications. As there is no benchmark in this community, we collect a holistic calibration dataset that can serve as a public platform to evaluate the generalization of existing methods. It comprises both synthetic and real-world data, with images and videos captured by different cameras in diverse scenes. Toward the end of this paper, we discuss the challenges and provide further research directions. To our knowledge, this is the first survey for the learning-based camera calibration (spanned 8 years). The summarized methods, datasets, and benchmarks are available and will be regularly updated at https://github.com/KangLiao929/Awesome-Deep-Camera-Calibration.

Read more

6/5/2024

A Universal Protocol to Benchmark Camera Calibration for Sports
Total Score

0

A Universal Protocol to Benchmark Camera Calibration for Sports

Floriane Magera, Thomas Hoyoux, Olivier Barnich, Marc Van Droogenbroeck

Camera calibration is a crucial component in the realm of sports analytics, as it serves as the foundation to extract 3D information out of the broadcast images. Despite the significance of camera calibration research in sports analytics, progress is impeded by outdated benchmarking criteria. Indeed, the annotation data and evaluation metrics provided by most currently available benchmarks strongly favor and incite the development of sports field registration methods, i.e. methods estimating homographies that map the sports field plane to the image plane. However, such homography-based methods are doomed to overlook the broader capabilities of camera calibration in bridging the 3D world to the image. In particular, real-world non-planar sports field elements (such as goals, corner flags, baskets, ...) and image distortion caused by broadcast camera lenses are out of the scope of sports field registration methods. To overcome these limitations, we designed a new benchmarking protocol, named ProCC, based on two principles: (1) the protocol should be agnostic to the camera model chosen for a camera calibration method, and (2) the protocol should fairly evaluate camera calibration methods using the reprojection of arbitrary yet accurately known 3D objects. Indirectly, we also provide insights into the metric used in SoccerNet-calibration, which solely relies on image annotation data of viewed 3D objects as ground truth, thus implementing our protocol. With experiments on the World Cup 2014, CARWC, and SoccerNet datasets, we show that our benchmarking protocol provides fairer evaluations of camera calibration methods. By defining our requirements for proper benchmarking, we hope to pave the way for a new stage in camera calibration for sports applications with high accuracy standards.

Read more

4/16/2024

🌀

Total Score

0

Single-image camera calibration with model-free distortion correction

Katia Genovese

Camera calibration is a process of paramount importance in computer vision applications that require accurate quantitative measurements. The popular method developed by Zhang relies on the use of a large number of images of a planar grid of fiducial points captured in multiple poses. Although flexible and easy to implement, Zhang's method has some limitations. The simultaneous optimization of the entire parameter set, including the coefficients of a predefined distortion model, may result in poor distortion correction at the image boundaries or in miscalculation of the intrinsic parameters, even with a reasonably small reprojection error. Indeed, applications involving image stitching (e.g. multi-camera systems) require accurate mapping of distortion up to the outermost regions of the image. Moreover, intrinsic parameters affect the accuracy of camera pose estimation, which is fundamental for applications such as vision servoing in robot navigation and automated assembly. This paper proposes a method for estimating the complete set of calibration parameters from a single image of a planar speckle pattern covering the entire sensor. The correspondence between image points and physical points on the calibration target is obtained using Digital Image Correlation. The effective focal length and the extrinsic parameters are calculated separately after a prior evaluation of the principal point. At the end of the procedure, a dense and uniform model-free distortion map is obtained over the entire image. Synthetic data with different noise levels were used to test the feasibility of the proposed method and to compare its metrological performance with Zhang's method. Real-world tests demonstrate the potential of the developed method to reveal aspects of the image formation that are hidden by averaging over multiple images.

Read more

6/26/2024