A Universal Protocol to Benchmark Camera Calibration for Sports
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a universal protocol to benchmark camera calibration for sports applications.
- The protocol aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate and compare different camera calibration methods used in sports analysis and tracking.
- The authors argue that a unified benchmark is needed to drive progress in this area and enable fair comparisons across research.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the challenge of accurately calibrating cameras used in sports analysis and tracking. Camera calibration is the process of determining the intrinsic and extrinsic parameters of a camera, which is essential for accurately measuring the position and movement of objects and players on a sports field.
The authors argue that a universal benchmark is needed to evaluate and compare different camera calibration methods used in sports applications. Without a standardized way to assess calibration accuracy, it is difficult to determine which methods work best and how they compare to each other. This hinders progress in the field and makes it hard for researchers and sports organizations to choose the right calibration approach for their needs.
The proposed protocol aims to provide a consistent and comprehensive way to test camera calibration techniques. It includes a set of standardized test scenarios, performance metrics, and datasets that can be used to benchmark different calibration methods. This would allow researchers and practitioners to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of various calibration approaches in a fair and systematic way.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a universal protocol for benchmarking camera calibration methods in sports applications. The protocol includes the following key elements:
-
Standardized test scenarios: The authors define a set of test scenarios that cover a range of common sports settings, such as outdoor fields, indoor courts, and multi-camera setups. These scenarios are designed to evaluate how well calibration methods perform under different lighting conditions, camera arrangements, and object movements.
-
Performance metrics: The protocol specifies a set of quantitative metrics to assess the accuracy of calibration, including reprojection error, 3D reconstruction error, and object tracking precision. These metrics provide a comprehensive way to evaluate the calibration performance across various tasks.
-
Benchmark datasets: The authors have created several benchmark datasets that include camera views, ground truth measurements, and reference objects for calibration. These datasets can be used to test and compare different calibration methods in a controlled and repeatable manner.
The proposed protocol builds on existing work in camera calibration benchmarking, such as the [EWAND] framework for wide-baseline camera calibration and the [table tennis ball spin estimation] research using event cameras. However, it extends these efforts to specifically address the unique challenges and requirements of sports applications.
The authors have also developed a [3D human scan moving event camera] dataset to further evaluate the performance of camera calibration methods in dynamic sports scenarios. This dataset includes ground truth 3D scans of human movements, which can be used to assess the accuracy of calibration-dependent tasks like pose estimation and tracking.
Critical Analysis
The proposed universal protocol for benchmarking camera calibration in sports is a valuable contribution to the field. The authors have identified a clear need for a standardized way to evaluate and compare different calibration methods, and their protocol provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to address this need.
One potential limitation of the protocol is the specific focus on sports applications. While this is a valid and important domain, the authors may want to consider expanding the scope to include other domains that also rely on accurate camera calibration, such as augmented reality, robotics, and surveillance. This could help make the protocol more widely applicable and influential.
Additionally, the authors could explore ways to incorporate more real-world data and conditions into the benchmark, such as dynamic lighting, occlusions, and camera movements. While the current test scenarios and datasets provide a controlled environment, incorporating more realistic factors could help better assess the robustness and practical applicability of different calibration methods.
Overall, the universal protocol presented in this paper is a well-conceived and valuable contribution to the field of camera calibration for sports. If widely adopted, it has the potential to drive significant progress and innovation in this important area of research and application.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a universal protocol to benchmark camera calibration for sports applications. The protocol includes standardized test scenarios, performance metrics, and benchmark datasets to enable a comprehensive and fair evaluation of different calibration methods.
By establishing a common framework for assessing camera calibration accuracy, the authors aim to facilitate progress in sports analysis and tracking. The protocol has the potential to help researchers, engineers, and sports organizations choose the most appropriate calibration techniques for their specific needs, leading to improved object and player monitoring, and ultimately, a better understanding of sports performance and tactics.
The authors have built upon existing work in camera calibration benchmarking and incorporated unique considerations for the sports domain. While the protocol could potentially be expanded to include a broader range of applications, it represents a significant step forward in driving innovation and standardization in this important field of computer vision and sports technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Universal Protocol to Benchmark Camera Calibration for Sports
Floriane Magera, Thomas Hoyoux, Olivier Barnich, Marc Van Droogenbroeck
Camera calibration is a crucial component in the realm of sports analytics, as it serves as the foundation to extract 3D information out of the broadcast images. Despite the significance of camera calibration research in sports analytics, progress is impeded by outdated benchmarking criteria. Indeed, the annotation data and evaluation metrics provided by most currently available benchmarks strongly favor and incite the development of sports field registration methods, i.e. methods estimating homographies that map the sports field plane to the image plane. However, such homography-based methods are doomed to overlook the broader capabilities of camera calibration in bridging the 3D world to the image. In particular, real-world non-planar sports field elements (such as goals, corner flags, baskets, ...) and image distortion caused by broadcast camera lenses are out of the scope of sports field registration methods. To overcome these limitations, we designed a new benchmarking protocol, named ProCC, based on two principles: (1) the protocol should be agnostic to the camera model chosen for a camera calibration method, and (2) the protocol should fairly evaluate camera calibration methods using the reprojection of arbitrary yet accurately known 3D objects. Indirectly, we also provide insights into the metric used in SoccerNet-calibration, which solely relies on image annotation data of viewed 3D objects as ground truth, thus implementing our protocol. With experiments on the World Cup 2014, CARWC, and SoccerNet datasets, we show that our benchmarking protocol provides fairer evaluations of camera calibration methods. By defining our requirements for proper benchmarking, we hope to pave the way for a new stage in camera calibration for sports applications with high accuracy standards.
Read more4/16/2024
0
No Bells, Just Whistles: Sports Field Registration by Leveraging Geometric Properties
Marc Guti'errez-P'erez, Antonio Agudo
Broadcast sports field registration is traditionally addressed as a homography estimation task, mapping the visible image area to a planar field model, predominantly focusing on the main camera shot. Addressing the shortcomings of previous approaches, we propose a novel calibration pipeline enabling camera calibration using a 3D soccer field model and extending the process to assess the multiple-view nature of broadcast videos. Our approach begins with a keypoint generation pipeline derived from SoccerNet dataset annotations, leveraging the geometric properties of the court. Subsequently, we execute classical camera calibration through DLT algorithm in a minimalist fashion, without further refinement. Through extensive experimentation on real-world soccer broadcast datasets such as SoccerNet-Calibration, WorldCup 2014 and TS- WorldCup, our method demonstrates superior performance in both multiple- and single-view 3D camera calibration while maintaining competitive results in homography estimation compared to state-of-the-art techniques.
Read more4/15/2024
0
A Synthetic Benchmarking Pipeline to Compare Camera Calibration Algorithms
Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou, Lars Krupp, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz
Accurate camera calibration is crucial for various computer vision applications. However, measuring calibration accuracy in the real world is challenging due to the lack of datasets with ground truth to evaluate them. In this paper, we present SynthCal, a synthetic camera calibration benchmarking pipeline that generates images of calibration patterns to measure and enable accurate quantification of calibration algorithm performance in camera parameter estimation. We present a SynthCal generated calibration dataset with four common patterns, two camera types, and two environments with varying view, distortion, lighting, and noise levels for both monocular and multi-camera systems. The dataset evaluates both single and multi-view calibration algorithms by measuring re-projection and root-mean-square errors for identical patterns and camera settings. Additionally, we analyze the significance of different patterns using different calibration configurations. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of SynthCal in evaluating various calibration algorithms and patterns.
Read more8/20/2024
🤿
2
Deep Learning for Camera Calibration and Beyond: A Survey
Kang Liao, Lang Nie, Shujuan Huang, Chunyu Lin, Jing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Moncef Gabbouj, Dacheng Tao
Camera calibration involves estimating camera parameters to infer geometric features from captured sequences, which is crucial for computer vision and robotics. However, conventional calibration is laborious and requires dedicated collection. Recent efforts show that learning-based solutions have the potential to be used in place of the repeatability works of manual calibrations. Among these solutions, various learning strategies, networks, geometric priors, and datasets have been investigated. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of learning-based camera calibration techniques, by analyzing their strengths and limitations. Our main calibration categories include the standard pinhole camera model, distortion camera model, cross-view model, and cross-sensor model, following the research trend and extended applications. As there is no benchmark in this community, we collect a holistic calibration dataset that can serve as a public platform to evaluate the generalization of existing methods. It comprises both synthetic and real-world data, with images and videos captured by different cameras in diverse scenes. Toward the end of this paper, we discuss the challenges and provide further research directions. To our knowledge, this is the first survey for the learning-based camera calibration (spanned 8 years). The summarized methods, datasets, and benchmarks are available and will be regularly updated at https://github.com/KangLiao929/Awesome-Deep-Camera-Calibration.
Read more6/5/2024