TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answering
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- TableBench is a comprehensive and complex benchmark for evaluating table question answering systems
- It covers a wide range of table types, question types, and reasoning skills
- The benchmark aims to advance the field of table question answering by providing a challenging and diverse dataset
Plain English Explanation
TableBench is a new dataset designed to test the abilities of machine learning models when it comes to answering questions about tables. Tables are a common way to organize and present data, and being able to understand and reason about the information in tables is an important skill for question answering systems and language models.
The TableBench dataset includes a wide variety of table types, question types, and reasoning skills that models need to master. For example, some tables might have complex structures with nested headers, while others might have numerical data that requires mathematical reasoning. The questions can also vary in their complexity, requiring different levels of understanding and inference.
By providing this diverse and challenging benchmark, the researchers hope to push the boundaries of what language models and table prediction systems are capable of. The ultimate goal is to create systems that can truly understand and reason about the information in tables, which has many practical applications in areas like data analysis, question answering, and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The TableBench dataset was constructed by the researchers to address the limitations of existing table question answering benchmarks. They collected a large and diverse set of tables from various sources, including websites, databases, and spreadsheets, and then generated a wide range of questions that test different reasoning skills.
The tables in the dataset cover a variety of domains, including finance, science, sports, and more. They also have different structures, such as tables with nested headers, tables with multiple sections, and tables with a mix of numerical and textual data. The questions span different types of reasoning, including literal understanding, numerical reasoning, logical inference, and contextual reasoning.
To ensure the quality and diversity of the dataset, the researchers employed a multi-step process. First, they used a combination of automated and manual techniques to generate the initial set of tables and questions. Then, they conducted extensive filtering and validation to remove low-quality or ambiguous items. Finally, they recruited a team of annotators to review the dataset and provide additional feedback and refinements.
The resulting TableBench dataset contains over 100,000 table-question pairs, making it one of the largest and most comprehensive benchmarks in the field. The researchers hope that this dataset will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on table question answering and related tasks.
Critical Analysis
One of the key strengths of the TableBench dataset is its diversity and complexity. By including a wide range of table types and question types, the researchers have created a challenging benchmark that pushes the boundaries of current table question answering systems. This is important because real-world applications often involve dealing with complex and varied data, and the ability to handle such complexity is a critical requirement for practical deployment.
However, the researchers do acknowledge some limitations of the dataset. For example, the tables in TableBench are mostly static and do not reflect the dynamic nature of real-world data sources, which can change over time. Additionally, the dataset focuses on English-language tables and questions, and it is unclear how well the benchmark would translate to other languages or cultural contexts.
Another potential concern is the potential for bias in the dataset. While the researchers have made efforts to ensure diversity, it is possible that certain biases or patterns could still be present in the data. This is an important consideration, as machine learning models can often pick up on and amplify these biases if they are not carefully addressed.
Overall, the TableBench dataset represents a significant advancement in the field of table question answering, and it is likely to become an important resource for researchers and practitioners working in this area. However, as with any benchmark, it is important to consider its limitations and to continue exploring new and innovative approaches to this challenging problem.
Conclusion
The TableBench dataset is a comprehensive and complex benchmark that aims to advance the state of the art in table question answering. By providing a diverse set of tables and questions, the researchers have created a challenging resource that can help drive progress in areas like natural language processing, data analysis, and decision-making.
While the dataset has some limitations, it represents a significant step forward in the field and is likely to become an important tool for researchers and practitioners working on table-related tasks. As the field continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how machine learning models and question answering systems perform on this benchmark and how the research community responds to the challenges it presents.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answering
Xianjie Wu, Jian Yang, Linzheng Chai, Ge Zhang, Jiaheng Liu, Xinrun Du, Di Liang, Daixin Shu, Xianfu Cheng, Tianzhen Sun, Guanglin Niu, Tongliang Li, Zhoujun Li
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have markedly enhanced the interpretation and processing of tabular data, introducing previously unimaginable capabilities. Despite these achievements, LLMs still encounter significant challenges when applied in industrial scenarios, particularly due to the increased complexity of reasoning required with real-world tabular data, underscoring a notable disparity between academic benchmarks and practical applications. To address this discrepancy, we conduct a detailed investigation into the application of tabular data in industrial scenarios and propose a comprehensive and complex benchmark TableBench, including 18 fields within four major categories of table question answering (TableQA) capabilities. Furthermore, we introduce TableLLM, trained on our meticulously constructed training set TableInstruct, achieving comparable performance with GPT-3.5. Massive experiments conducted on TableBench indicate that both open-source and proprietary LLMs still have significant room for improvement to meet real-world demands, where the most advanced model, GPT-4, achieves only a modest score compared to humans.
Read more8/20/2024
🤔
0
TableVQA-Bench: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark on Multiple Table Domains
Yoonsik Kim, Moonbin Yim, Ka Yeon Song
In this paper, we establish a benchmark for table visual question answering, referred to as the TableVQA-Bench, derived from pre-existing table question-answering (QA) and table structure recognition datasets. It is important to note that existing datasets have not incorporated images or QA pairs, which are two crucial components of TableVQA. As such, the primary objective of this paper is to obtain these necessary components. Specifically, images are sourced either through the application of a textit{stylesheet} or by employing the proposed table rendering system. QA pairs are generated by exploiting the large language model (LLM) where the input is a text-formatted table. Ultimately, the completed TableVQA-Bench comprises 1,500 QA pairs. We comprehensively compare the performance of various multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) on TableVQA-Bench. GPT-4V achieves the highest accuracy among commercial and open-sourced MLLMs from our experiments. Moreover, we discover that the number of vision queries plays a significant role in TableVQA performance. To further analyze the capabilities of MLLMs in comparison to their LLM backbones, we investigate by presenting image-formatted tables to MLLMs and text-formatted tables to LLMs, respectively. Our findings suggest that processing visual inputs is more challenging than text inputs, as evidenced by the lower performance of MLLMs, despite generally requiring higher computational costs than LLMs. The proposed TableVQA-Bench and evaluation codes are available at href{https://github.com/naver-ai/tablevqabench}{https://github.com/naver-ai/tablevqabench}.
Read more5/1/2024
💬
0
Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Study
Yuan Sui, Mengyu Zhou, Mingjie Zhou, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang
Large language models (LLMs) are becoming attractive as few-shot reasoners to solve Natural Language (NL)-related tasks. However, the understanding of their capability to process structured data like tables remains an under-explored area. While tables can be serialized as input for LLMs, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on whether LLMs genuinely comprehend this data. In this paper, we try to understand this by designing a benchmark to evaluate the structural understanding capabilities of LLMs through seven distinct tasks, e.g., cell lookup, row retrieval and size detection. Specially, we perform a series of evaluations on the recent most advanced LLM models, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 and observe that performance varied with different input choices, including table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks. Drawing from the insights gained through the benchmark evaluations, we propose $textit{self-augmentation}$ for effective structural prompting, such as critical value / range identification using internal knowledge of LLMs. When combined with carefully chosen input choices, these structural prompting methods lead to promising improvements in LLM performance on a variety of tabular tasks, e.g., TabFact($uparrow2.31%$), HybridQA($uparrow2.13%$), SQA($uparrow2.72%$), Feverous($uparrow0.84%$), and ToTTo($uparrow5.68%$). We believe that our open source benchmark and proposed prompting methods can serve as a simple yet generic selection for future research. The code and data of this paper will be temporality released at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/StructuredLLM-76F3/README.md and will be replaced with an official one at https://github.com/microsoft/TableProvider later.
Read more7/18/2024
0
On the Robustness of Language Models for Tabular Question Answering
Kushal Raj Bhandari, Sixue Xing, Soham Dan, Jianxi Gao
Large Language Models (LLMs), originally shown to ace various text comprehension tasks have also remarkably been shown to tackle table comprehension tasks without specific training. While previous research has explored LLM capabilities with tabular dataset tasks, our study assesses the influence of $textit{in-context learning}$,$ textit{model scale}$, $textit{instruction tuning}$, and $textit{domain biases}$ on Tabular Question Answering (TQA). We evaluate the robustness of LLMs on Wikipedia-based $textbf{WTQ}$ and financial report-based $textbf{TAT-QA}$ TQA datasets, focusing on their ability to robustly interpret tabular data under various augmentations and perturbations. Our findings indicate that instructions significantly enhance performance, with recent models like Llama3 exhibiting greater robustness over earlier versions. However, data contamination and practical reliability issues persist, especially with WTQ. We highlight the need for improved methodologies, including structure-aware self-attention mechanisms and better handling of domain-specific tabular data, to develop more reliable LLMs for table comprehension.
Read more6/19/2024