Tag and correct: high precision post-editing approach to correction of speech recognition errors

Read original: arXiv:2406.07589 - Published 6/13/2024 by Tomasz Zik{e}tkiewicz
Total Score

0

🗣️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a "Bare Demo" of the IEEEtran.cls LaTeX class, which is commonly used for formatting conference papers.
  • The paper provides a basic example of how to structure and style a conference paper using the IEEEtran.cls class.
  • It covers key elements like the title, author information, abstract, sections, and references.

Plain English Explanation

This paper is essentially a template or example that shows how to format a conference paper using a specific set of LaTeX tools. LaTeX is a typesetting language that is commonly used for academic and technical publications. The IEEEtran.cls class is a specific set of LaTeX formatting rules that are often used for papers at IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) conferences.

The paper demonstrates how to properly structure the different components of a conference paper, such as the title, author information, abstract, section headings, and references, using the IEEEtran.cls class. This can be very helpful for researchers and writers who need to format their work for an IEEE conference, as it provides a clear, pre-formatted example to follow.

While the content of the paper itself is quite basic, the value lies in the formatting and structure, which can save a lot of time and effort when preparing a conference submission. By using this template, authors can focus on the content of their research without having to worry about the specific formatting requirements.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a basic demonstration of how to use the IEEEtran.cls LaTeX class to format a conference paper. It includes the necessary LaTeX commands and structure to create the title, author information, abstract, section headings, and references.

The paper uses standard LaTeX markup and commands to achieve the desired formatting. For example, it demonstrates how to use the \title{}, \author{}, and \maketitle commands to properly format the paper's title and author information. Similarly, it shows how to create section headings using the \section{}, \subsection{}, and \subsubsection{} commands.

The references are formatted using the IEEE reference style, which is a common requirement for IEEE conference papers. The paper includes a sample reference list to illustrate the proper formatting.

Overall, this "Bare Demo" provides a concise, yet comprehensive, example of how to structure and style a conference paper using the IEEEtran.cls LaTeX class.

Critical Analysis

The paper serves its intended purpose well by providing a clear, straightforward template for formatting an IEEE conference paper using LaTeX. The formatting and structure closely follow the requirements and conventions of IEEE publications, which should make it easy for authors to adapt this template for their own work.

One potential limitation is that the paper does not go into much detail on the rationale behind the specific formatting choices or the nuances of the IEEEtran.cls class. More in-depth documentation or commentary on these aspects could be helpful for LaTeX novices or those new to IEEE formatting requirements.

Additionally, the paper does not address any potential challenges or edge cases that authors may encounter when using this template, such as handling complex equations, figures, or other non-standard content. Some guidance or advice on how to overcome these types of issues would further enhance the usefulness of this demo.

Overall, however, this paper provides a solid foundation for formatting an IEEE conference paper in LaTeX, and could be a valuable resource for researchers and writers preparing submissions for IEEE conferences.

Conclusion

This "Bare Demo of IEEEtran.cls for Conferences" paper offers a straightforward example of how to structure and style a conference paper using the IEEEtran.cls LaTeX class. By providing a pre-formatted template, the paper can save authors significant time and effort when preparing their work for IEEE conference submissions.

While the content of the paper itself is quite basic, the value lies in the clear demonstration of the formatting requirements and conventions expected for IEEE publications. This can be particularly helpful for researchers and writers who are new to LaTeX or unfamiliar with IEEE's formatting guidelines.

Overall, this paper serves as a useful reference and starting point for anyone needing to format a conference paper according to IEEE standards using the LaTeX typesetting system.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🗣️

Total Score

0

Tag and correct: high precision post-editing approach to correction of speech recognition errors

Tomasz Zik{e}tkiewicz

This paper presents a new approach to the problem of correcting speech recognition errors by means of post-editing. It consists of using a neural sequence tagger that learns how to correct an ASR (Automatic Speech Recognition) hypothesis word by word and a corrector module that applies corrections returned by the tagger. The proposed solution is applicable to any ASR system, regardless of its architecture, and provides high-precision control over errors being corrected. This is especially crucial in production environments, where avoiding the introduction of new mistakes by the error correction model may be more important than the net gain in overall results. The results show that the performance of the proposed error correction models is comparable with previous approaches while requiring much smaller resources to train, which makes it suitable for industrial applications, where both inference latency and training times are critical factors that limit the use of other techniques.

Read more

6/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Speaker Tagging Correction With Non-Autoregressive Language Models

Grigor Kirakosyan, Davit Karamyan

Speech applications dealing with conversations require not only recognizing the spoken words but also determining who spoke when. The task of assigning words to speakers is typically addressed by merging the outputs of two separate systems, namely, an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system and a speaker diarization (SD) system. In practical settings, speaker diarization systems can experience significant degradation in performance due to a variety of factors, including uniform segmentation with a high temporal resolution, inaccurate word timestamps, incorrect clustering and estimation of speaker numbers, as well as background noise. Therefore, it is important to automatically detect errors and make corrections if possible. We used a second-pass speaker tagging correction system based on a non-autoregressive language model to correct mistakes in words placed at the borders of sentences spoken by different speakers. We first show that the employed error correction approach leads to reductions in word diarization error rate (WDER) on two datasets: TAL and test set of Fisher. Additionally, we evaluated our system in the Post-ASR Speaker Tagging Correction challenge and observed significant improvements in cpWER compared to baseline methods.

Read more

9/4/2024

Error Correction by Paying Attention to Both Acoustic and Confidence References for Automatic Speech Recognition
Total Score

0

Error Correction by Paying Attention to Both Acoustic and Confidence References for Automatic Speech Recognition

Yuchun Shu, Bo Hu, Yifeng He, Hao Shi, Longbiao Wang, Jianwu Dang

Accurately finding the wrong words in the automatic speech recognition (ASR) hypothesis and recovering them well-founded is the goal of speech error correction. In this paper, we propose a non-autoregressive speech error correction method. A Confidence Module measures the uncertainty of each word of the N-best ASR hypotheses as the reference to find the wrong word position. Besides, the acoustic feature from the ASR encoder is also used to provide the correct pronunciation references. N-best candidates from ASR are aligned using the edit path, to confirm each other and recover some missing character errors. Furthermore, the cross-attention mechanism fuses the information between error correction references and the ASR hypothesis. The experimental results show that both the acoustic and confidence references help with error correction. The proposed system reduces the error rate by 21% compared with the ASR model.

Read more

7/19/2024

Improving Speech Recognition Error Prediction for Modern and Off-the-shelf Speech Recognizers
Total Score

0

Improving Speech Recognition Error Prediction for Modern and Off-the-shelf Speech Recognizers

Prashant Serai, Peidong Wang, Eric Fosler-Lussier

Modeling the errors of a speech recognizer can help simulate errorful recognized speech data from plain text, which has proven useful for tasks like discriminative language modeling, improving robustness of NLP systems, where limited or even no audio data is available at train time. Previous work typically considered replicating behavior of GMM-HMM based systems, but the behavior of more modern posterior-based neural network acoustic models is not the same and requires adjustments to the error prediction model. In this work, we extend a prior phonetic confusion based model for predicting speech recognition errors in two ways: first, we introduce a sampling-based paradigm that better simulates the behavior of a posterior-based acoustic model. Second, we investigate replacing the confusion matrix with a sequence-to-sequence model in order to introduce context dependency into the prediction. We evaluate the error predictors in two ways: first by predicting the errors made by a Switchboard ASR system on unseen data (Fisher), and then using that same predictor to estimate the behavior of an unrelated cloud-based ASR system on a novel task. Sampling greatly improves predictive accuracy within a 100-guess paradigm, while the sequence model performs similarly to the confusion matrix.

Read more

8/22/2024