Tangram: A Challenging Benchmark for Geometric Element Recognizing
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a new benchmark called "Tangram" for evaluating the geometric element recognition capabilities of large multimodal models.
- Tangram consists of a dataset of geometric shapes that must be identified and classified.
- The paper presents the design and evaluation of the Tangram benchmark, as well as discuss its potential impact on advancing multimodal AI research.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new tool called the "Tangram" benchmark to test the ability of large AI models to recognize and classify different geometric shapes. The Tangram dataset contains various shapes, and the models are challenged to identify what each shape is. This benchmark is designed to push the boundaries of what current multimodal AI systems can do, as recognizing and understanding geometric elements is a fundamental skill for many real-world applications.
By creating this challenging benchmark, the researchers hope to drive progress in the field of multimodal AI, where models need to process and make sense of information from different sources, such as text, images, and even 3D shapes. The insights gained from evaluating model performance on Tangram could lead to advancements in areas like computer vision, geometric reasoning, and the development of more capable AI assistants that can understand and interact with the physical world.
Technical Explanation
The Tangram benchmark is designed to evaluate the ability of large multimodal models to recognize and classify various geometric shapes. The dataset consists of images of different Tangram pieces, which are a classic Chinese puzzle made up of seven flat shapes that can be arranged to form various silhouettes and outlines.
The researchers have carefully curated the Tangram dataset to include a diverse set of shapes, orientations, and configurations, making it a challenging test for current AI systems. By focusing on geometric reasoning and shape recognition, the Tangram benchmark aims to push the boundaries of what multimodal models can do, beyond just processing text and images.
The paper presents the design of the Tangram dataset, including the process of generating the shapes, annotating them, and splitting the data into training, validation, and test sets. The researchers also describe the evaluation metrics used to assess model performance, such as classification accuracy and the ability to correctly identify individual Tangram pieces within a given shape.
Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate the capabilities and limitations of state-of-the-art multimodal models on the Tangram benchmark. The results highlight the need for further advancements in areas like geometric reasoning, shape understanding, and the integration of different modalities (e.g., text, images, 3D shapes) to tackle challenges posed by the Tangram dataset.
Critical Analysis
The Tangram benchmark is a well-designed and compelling test for evaluating the geometric reasoning capabilities of multimodal AI models. The researchers have thoughtfully curated the dataset to include a diverse set of shapes and configurations, making it a challenging benchmark that goes beyond traditional image recognition tasks.
One potential limitation of the Tangram benchmark is the reliance on 2D images of the shapes, which may not fully capture the 3D spatial reasoning required in some real-world applications. Future work could explore extending the benchmark to include 3D shape data or even physical Tangram puzzles to further challenge the models' understanding of geometry and spatial relationships.
Additionally, while the Tangram benchmark focuses on geometric element recognition, it would be interesting to see how these models perform on tasks that require higher-level reasoning, such as solving complete Tangram puzzles or generating new Tangram shapes. Expanding the benchmark to include such tasks could provide deeper insights into the models' geometric reasoning capabilities.
Overall, the Tangram benchmark represents an important step forward in the development of more capable and versatile multimodal AI systems. By pushing the boundaries of geometric element recognition, the research presented in this paper could lead to advancements in computer vision, mathematical reasoning, and the creation of AI assistants that can better understand and interact with the physical world.
Conclusion
The Tangram benchmark introduced in this paper represents a significant step forward in the field of multimodal AI research. By focusing on the challenging task of geometric element recognition, the researchers have created a dataset and evaluation framework that can push the boundaries of what current AI models are capable of.
The insights gained from the Tangram benchmark could lead to advancements in areas such as computer vision, geometric reasoning, and the development of more capable AI assistants. As the field of multimodal AI continues to evolve, benchmarks like Tangram will play an important role in driving progress and ensuring that AI systems can effectively process and understand information from diverse sources.
Overall, the Tangram benchmark is a valuable contribution to the research community, and the findings presented in this paper have the potential to significantly impact the future of multimodal AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Tangram: A Challenging Benchmark for Geometric Element Recognizing
Jiamin Tang, Chao Zhang, Xudong Zhu, Mengchi Liu
Significant advancements in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have enabled them to tackle complex problems involving visual-mathematical reasoning. However, their ability to identify geometric elements remains understudied. To bridge this gap, we introduce Tangram, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of LMMs on geometric element recognition. Tangram includes 1,080 diverse geometric diagrams sourced from primary and secondary school exams, competitions, and textbooks, covering from simple basic geometric shapes to complex combinations. Each diagram is associated with four questions, resulting in a total of 4,320 visual-question-answer pairs. Unlike existing benchmarks that seek higher-level cognition and reasoning, Tangram focuses on the understanding of geometric elements, requiring models to perform a simple but interesting counting task. Systematic evaluation of 10 prominent LMMs, such as GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, shows that even in the seemingly simple task, these models still face significant challenges. Notably, the overall accuracy of the top performer across all tested models is only 56.8%, marking a significant gap when compared to human performance. These findings highlight the limitations of current multimodal artificial intelligence systems in handling basic perception tasks, and will inspire the development of the next generation of expert-level multimodal foundational models. The Tangram and evaluation code will be available soon.
Read more8/27/2024
0
Advancing Geometric Problem Solving: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Model Evaluation
Kai Sun, Yushi Bai, Ji Qi, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li
To advance the evaluation of multimodal math reasoning in large multimodal models (LMMs), this paper introduces a novel benchmark, MM-MATH. MM-MATH consists of 5,929 open-ended middle school math problems with visual contexts, with fine-grained classification across difficulty, grade level, and knowledge points. Unlike existing benchmarks relying on binary answer comparison, MM-MATH incorporates both outcome and process evaluations. Process evaluation employs LMM-as-a-judge to automatically analyze solution steps, identifying and categorizing errors into specific error types. Extensive evaluation of ten models on MM-MATH reveals significant challenges for existing LMMs, highlighting their limited utilization of visual information and struggles with higher-difficulty problems. The best-performing model achieves only 31% accuracy on MM-MATH, compared to 82% for humans. This highlights the challenging nature of our benchmark for existing models and the significant gap between the multimodal reasoning capabilities of current models and humans. Our process evaluation reveals that diagram misinterpretation is the most common error, accounting for more than half of the total error cases, underscoring the need for improved image comprehension in multimodal reasoning.
Read more6/28/2024
⚙️
0
GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving
Jiaxin Zhang, Zhongzhi Li, Mingliang Zhang, Fei Yin, Chenglin Liu, Yashar Moshfeghi
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal models (MMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capabilities in problem-solving. Yet, their proficiency in tackling geometry math problems, which necessitates an integrated understanding of both textual and visual information, has not been thoroughly evaluated. To address this gap, we introduce the GeoEval benchmark, a comprehensive collection that includes a main subset of 2,000 problems, a 750 problems subset focusing on backward reasoning, an augmented subset of 2,000 problems, and a hard subset of 300 problems. This benchmark facilitates a deeper investigation into the performance of LLMs and MMs in solving geometry math problems. Our evaluation of ten LLMs and MMs across these varied subsets reveals that the WizardMath model excels, achieving a 55.67% accuracy rate on the main subset but only a 6.00% accuracy on the hard subset. This highlights the critical need for testing models against datasets on which they have not been pre-trained. Additionally, our findings indicate that GPT-series models perform more effectively on problems they have rephrased, suggesting a promising method for enhancing model capabilities.
Read more5/20/2024
0
CMM-Math: A Chinese Multimodal Math Dataset To Evaluate and Enhance the Mathematics Reasoning of Large Multimodal Models
Wentao Liu, Qianjun Pan, Yi Zhang, Zhuo Liu, Ji Wu, Jie Zhou, Aimin Zhou, Qin Chen, Bo Jiang, Liang He
Large language models (LLMs) have obtained promising results in mathematical reasoning, which is a foundational skill for human intelligence. Most previous studies focus on improving and measuring the performance of LLMs based on textual math reasoning datasets (e.g., MATH, GSM8K). Recently, a few researchers have released English multimodal math datasets (e.g., MATHVISTA and MATH-V) to evaluate the effectiveness of large multimodal models (LMMs). In this paper, we release a Chinese multimodal math (CMM-Math) dataset, including benchmark and training parts, to evaluate and enhance the mathematical reasoning of LMMs. CMM-Math contains over 28,000 high-quality samples, featuring a variety of problem types (e.g., multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, and so on) with detailed solutions across 12 grade levels from elementary to high school in China. Specifically, the visual context may be present in the questions or opinions, which makes this dataset more challenging. Through comprehensive analysis, we discover that state-of-the-art LMMs on the CMM-Math dataset face challenges, emphasizing the necessity for further improvements in LMM development. We also propose a Multimodal Mathematical LMM (Math-LMM) to handle the problems with mixed input of multiple images and text segments. We train our model using three stages, including foundational pre-training, foundational fine-tuning, and mathematical fine-tuning. The extensive experiments indicate that our model effectively improves math reasoning performance by comparing it with the SOTA LMMs over three multimodal mathematical datasets.
Read more9/9/2024