Targeted Reduction of Causal Models
2311.18639
0
0
Abstract
Why does a phenomenon occur? Addressing this question is central to most scientific inquiries and often relies on simulations of scientific models. As models become more intricate, deciphering the causes behind phenomena in high-dimensional spaces of interconnected variables becomes increasingly challenging. Causal Representation Learning (CRL) offers a promising avenue to uncover interpretable causal patterns within these simulations through an interventional lens. However, developing general CRL frameworks suitable for practical applications remains an open challenge. We introduce Targeted Causal Reduction (TCR), a method for condensing complex intervenable models into a concise set of causal factors that explain a specific target phenomenon. We propose an information theoretic objective to learn TCR from interventional data of simulations, establish identifiability for continuous variables under shift interventions and present a practical algorithm for learning TCRs. Its ability to generate interpretable high-level explanations from complex models is demonstrated on toy and mechanical systems, illustrating its potential to assist scientists in the study of complex phenomena in a broad range of disciplines.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for learning controllable counterfactual representations from identifiable causal models.
- It aims to enable more robust and transferable AI systems by isolating the effects of environmental confounders.
- The work builds on research in areas like structural causal models, temporal causal discovery, and trajectory representations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a way to build AI systems that can better understand the real-world causes behind observed data and events. By learning identifiable causal representations from data, the approach aims to enable these systems to generate controllable counterfactual scenarios - essentially, imagining how things could have played out differently.
This is useful because it can help AI models become more robust and transferable to new situations. For example, an AI system tasked with predicting the trajectory of a vehicle could use this technique to isolate the effects of external factors like weather or road conditions. This would allow the model to focus on the core dynamics of the vehicle itself, making its predictions more reliable and applicable to a wider range of conditions.
The work builds on research in areas like structural causal models, which provide a mathematical framework for reasoning about cause and effect, and temporal causal discovery, which helps uncover the underlying causal structure of time-series data. The proposed method also relates to research on robust trajectory representations, which explores ways to isolate the effects of environmental factors on observed data.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of the paper is to learn a causal generative model that can generate controllable counterfactual representations from observational data. The authors first build an identifiable causal representation of the data using a structural causal model. This model captures the underlying causal relationships between variables in the data.
The authors then use this causal representation to train a generative model that can generate new, counterfactual samples. These counterfactual samples represent hypothetical scenarios where certain causal factors have been altered or intervened upon. By controlling the interventions, the generative model can produce counterfactual samples that isolate the effects of specific causal factors.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on several benchmark datasets, including uplift modeling under limited supervision and trajectory prediction tasks. The results show that the learned counterfactual representations can indeed improve the robustness and transferability of downstream AI models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for learning more controllable and interpretable AI systems. By explicitly modeling the causal structure of the data, the method enables AI models to better understand the underlying drivers of observed phenomena. This can lead to more robust and transferable predictions, as demonstrated in the experiments.
However, the authors acknowledge that the causal modeling approach relies on certain assumptions, such as the availability of identifiable causal representations and the ability to intervene on specific causal factors. In real-world scenarios, these assumptions may not always hold, and the method's performance may be limited.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical implications of generating controllable counterfactual scenarios. While this capability can be valuable for scientific and engineering applications, it also raises questions about the responsible use of such technology, particularly in areas like decision-making or risk assessment.
Further research could explore ways to relax the assumptions of the current approach, as well as investigate the ethical considerations and societal impacts of controllable causal reasoning in AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for learning controllable counterfactual representations from identifiable causal models. By explicitly modeling the causal structure of the data, the method enables AI systems to generate hypothetical scenarios that isolate the effects of specific causal factors. This can lead to more robust and transferable predictions, which is crucial for building reliable and trustworthy AI systems.
The work builds on and advances research in areas like structural causal models, temporal causal discovery, and robust trajectory representations. While the proposed method shows promise, it also raises important questions about the ethical considerations and potential societal impacts of controllable causal reasoning in AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment
Julius von Kugelgen
0
0
Causal models provide rich descriptions of complex systems as sets of mechanisms by which each variable is influenced by its direct causes. They support reasoning about manipulating parts of the system and thus hold promise for addressing some of the open challenges of artificial intelligence (AI), such as planning, transferring knowledge in changing environments, or robustness to distribution shifts. However, a key obstacle to more widespread use of causal models in AI is the requirement that the relevant variables be specified a priori, which is typically not the case for the high-dimensional, unstructured data processed by modern AI systems. At the same time, machine learning (ML) has proven quite successful at automatically extracting useful and compact representations of such complex data. Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to combine the core strengths of ML and causality by learning representations in the form of latent variables endowed with causal model semantics. In this thesis, we study and present new results for different CRL settings. A central theme is the question of identifiability: Given infinite data, when are representations satisfying the same learning objective guaranteed to be equivalent? This is an important prerequisite for CRL, as it formally characterises if and when a learning task is, at least in principle, feasible. Since learning causal models, even without a representation learning component, is notoriously difficult, we require additional assumptions on the model class or rich data beyond the classical i.i.d. setting. By partially characterising identifiability for different settings, this thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations. Ideally, the developed insights can help inform data collection practices or inspire the design of new practical estimation methods.
6/21/2024
🔎
Causal Representation Learning Made Identifiable by Grouping of Observational Variables
Hiroshi Morioka, Aapo Hyvarinen
0
0
A topic of great current interest is Causal Representation Learning (CRL), whose goal is to learn a causal model for hidden features in a data-driven manner. Unfortunately, CRL is severely ill-posed since it is a combination of the two notoriously ill-posed problems of representation learning and causal discovery. Yet, finding practical identifiability conditions that guarantee a unique solution is crucial for its practical applicability. Most approaches so far have been based on assumptions on the latent causal mechanisms, such as temporal causality, or existence of supervision or interventions; these can be too restrictive in actual applications. Here, we show identifiability based on novel, weak constraints, which requires no temporal structure, intervention, nor weak supervision. The approach is based on assuming the observational mixing exhibits a suitable grouping of the observational variables. We also propose a novel self-supervised estimation framework consistent with the model, prove its statistical consistency, and experimentally show its superior CRL performances compared to the state-of-the-art baselines. We further demonstrate its robustness against latent confounders and causal cycles.
6/10/2024
📉
From Identifiable Causal Representations to Controllable Counterfactual Generation: A Survey on Causal Generative Modeling
Aneesh Komanduri, Xintao Wu, Yongkai Wu, Feng Chen
0
0
Deep generative models have shown tremendous capability in data density estimation and data generation from finite samples. While these models have shown impressive performance by learning correlations among features in the data, some fundamental shortcomings are their lack of explainability, tendency to induce spurious correlations, and poor out-of-distribution extrapolation. To remedy such challenges, recent work has proposed a shift toward causal generative models. Causal models offer several beneficial properties to deep generative models, such as distribution shift robustness, fairness, and interpretability. Structural causal models (SCMs) describe data-generating processes and model complex causal relationships and mechanisms among variables in a system. Thus, SCMs can naturally be combined with deep generative models. We provide a technical survey on causal generative modeling categorized into causal representation learning and controllable counterfactual generation methods. We focus on fundamental theory, methodology, drawbacks, datasets, and metrics. Then, we cover applications of causal generative models in fairness, privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, precision medicine, and biological sciences. Lastly, we discuss open problems and fruitful research directions for future work in the field.
5/24/2024
🤿
Linear Causal Representation Learning from Unknown Multi-node Interventions
Burak Var{i}c{i}, Emre Acarturk, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Ali Tajer
0
0
Despite the multifaceted recent advances in interventional causal representation learning (CRL), they primarily focus on the stylized assumption of single-node interventions. This assumption is not valid in a wide range of applications, and generally, the subset of nodes intervened in an interventional environment is fully unknown. This paper focuses on interventional CRL under unknown multi-node (UMN) interventional environments and establishes the first identifiability results for general latent causal models (parametric or nonparametric) under stochastic interventions (soft or hard) and linear transformation from the latent to observed space. Specifically, it is established that given sufficiently diverse interventional environments, (i) identifiability up to ancestors is possible using only soft interventions, and (ii) perfect identifiability is possible using hard interventions. Remarkably, these guarantees match the best-known results for more restrictive single-node interventions. Furthermore, CRL algorithms are also provided that achieve the identifiability guarantees. A central step in designing these algorithms is establishing the relationships between UMN interventional CRL and score functions associated with the statistical models of different interventional environments. Establishing these relationships also serves as constructive proof of the identifiability guarantees.
6/11/2024