Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment
2406.13371
0
0
🔎
Abstract
Causal models provide rich descriptions of complex systems as sets of mechanisms by which each variable is influenced by its direct causes. They support reasoning about manipulating parts of the system and thus hold promise for addressing some of the open challenges of artificial intelligence (AI), such as planning, transferring knowledge in changing environments, or robustness to distribution shifts. However, a key obstacle to more widespread use of causal models in AI is the requirement that the relevant variables be specified a priori, which is typically not the case for the high-dimensional, unstructured data processed by modern AI systems. At the same time, machine learning (ML) has proven quite successful at automatically extracting useful and compact representations of such complex data. Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to combine the core strengths of ML and causality by learning representations in the form of latent variables endowed with causal model semantics. In this thesis, we study and present new results for different CRL settings. A central theme is the question of identifiability: Given infinite data, when are representations satisfying the same learning objective guaranteed to be equivalent? This is an important prerequisite for CRL, as it formally characterises if and when a learning task is, at least in principle, feasible. Since learning causal models, even without a representation learning component, is notoriously difficult, we require additional assumptions on the model class or rich data beyond the classical i.i.d. setting. By partially characterising identifiability for different settings, this thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations. Ideally, the developed insights can help inform data collection practices or inspire the design of new practical estimation methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the field of causal representation learning (CRL), which aims to combine the strengths of machine learning and causal modeling.
- The central focus is on the question of identifiability - when can we guarantee that the learned representations are equivalent to the true underlying causal model, given infinite data?
- The paper investigates different CRL settings and the assumptions required to achieve identifiability, contributing to the theoretical foundations of this emerging field.
Plain English Explanation
Causal models are a powerful way to understand complex systems. They describe how different parts of the system influence each other, like a network of causes and effects. This could be useful for AI systems, helping them plan actions, adapt to new environments, and be more robust.
However, a key challenge is that AI systems often work with high-dimensional, unstructured data, where the relevant variables are not known ahead of time. Machine learning has been great at automatically finding useful representations of this kind of complex data.
Causal representation learning aims to combine the strengths of machine learning and causal modeling. The idea is to learn representations (like hidden variables) that have causal model semantics - they correspond to the underlying causes in the system.
A central question is identifiability - if we had infinite data, could we be guaranteed that the learned representations match the true causal model? This is important, because if the learning task is not identifiable, then the system might never converge to the true causal structure, even with unlimited data.
The paper explores different settings for causal representation learning, looking at what assumptions are needed to achieve identifiability. This helps us understand the theoretical limits of what's possible without direct supervision, and can inform the design of practical CRL methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the problem of causal representation learning, where the goal is to learn a set of latent variables that capture the underlying causal structure of a system, even when the relevant variables are not known a priori.
A key challenge is the question of identifiability - under what conditions can we guarantee that the learned representations correspond to the true causal model, given infinite data? Since learning causal models is notoriously difficult, the paper explores additional assumptions beyond the classical i.i.d. setting, such as structured model classes or multiple observational distributions.
By partially characterizing identifiability in these different settings, the paper contributes to the theoretical foundations of causal representation learning. The insights gained can inform data collection practices or inspire the design of new practical estimation methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes important theoretical contributions to the emerging field of causal representation learning. By focusing on the identifiability question, it highlights a fundamental challenge that must be addressed for CRL to be truly useful in practice.
One potential limitation is that the analysis is largely theoretical, and the practical implications for real-world AI systems are not always clear. The paper mentions the need for additional assumptions, such as structured model classes or multiple observational distributions, which may be difficult to satisfy in many applications.
Furthermore, the paper does not discuss potential risks or ethical considerations around the use of causal models in AI systems. As these models become more advanced, it will be crucial to carefully examine their societal impact and ensure they are developed and deployed responsibly.
Overall, this paper lays important groundwork for the theoretical foundations of causal representation learning. However, future research should aim to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and consider the broader implications of this technology as it continues to evolve.
Conclusion
This paper explores the field of causal representation learning, which seeks to combine the strengths of machine learning and causal modeling to build AI systems with improved planning, adaptability, and robustness.
A key focus is the question of identifiability - can we guarantee that the learned representations match the true underlying causal structure, given infinite data? By partially characterizing identifiability in different settings, the paper contributes to the theoretical foundations of this emerging field.
The insights gained can inform data collection practices and inspire the design of new practical estimation methods for causal representation learning. As this technology continues to advance, it will be important to carefully consider its societal implications and ensure it is developed and deployed responsibly.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Causal Representation Learning Made Identifiable by Grouping of Observational Variables
Hiroshi Morioka, Aapo Hyvarinen
0
0
A topic of great current interest is Causal Representation Learning (CRL), whose goal is to learn a causal model for hidden features in a data-driven manner. Unfortunately, CRL is severely ill-posed since it is a combination of the two notoriously ill-posed problems of representation learning and causal discovery. Yet, finding practical identifiability conditions that guarantee a unique solution is crucial for its practical applicability. Most approaches so far have been based on assumptions on the latent causal mechanisms, such as temporal causality, or existence of supervision or interventions; these can be too restrictive in actual applications. Here, we show identifiability based on novel, weak constraints, which requires no temporal structure, intervention, nor weak supervision. The approach is based on assuming the observational mixing exhibits a suitable grouping of the observational variables. We also propose a novel self-supervised estimation framework consistent with the model, prove its statistical consistency, and experimentally show its superior CRL performances compared to the state-of-the-art baselines. We further demonstrate its robustness against latent confounders and causal cycles.
6/10/2024
Targeted Reduction of Causal Models
Armin Keki'c, Bernhard Scholkopf, Michel Besserve
0
0
Why does a phenomenon occur? Addressing this question is central to most scientific inquiries and often relies on simulations of scientific models. As models become more intricate, deciphering the causes behind phenomena in high-dimensional spaces of interconnected variables becomes increasingly challenging. Causal Representation Learning (CRL) offers a promising avenue to uncover interpretable causal patterns within these simulations through an interventional lens. However, developing general CRL frameworks suitable for practical applications remains an open challenge. We introduce Targeted Causal Reduction (TCR), a method for condensing complex intervenable models into a concise set of causal factors that explain a specific target phenomenon. We propose an information theoretic objective to learn TCR from interventional data of simulations, establish identifiability for continuous variables under shift interventions and present a practical algorithm for learning TCRs. Its ability to generate interpretable high-level explanations from complex models is demonstrated on toy and mechanical systems, illustrating its potential to assist scientists in the study of complex phenomena in a broad range of disciplines.
6/4/2024
🤿
Linear Causal Representation Learning from Unknown Multi-node Interventions
Burak Var{i}c{i}, Emre Acarturk, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Ali Tajer
0
0
Despite the multifaceted recent advances in interventional causal representation learning (CRL), they primarily focus on the stylized assumption of single-node interventions. This assumption is not valid in a wide range of applications, and generally, the subset of nodes intervened in an interventional environment is fully unknown. This paper focuses on interventional CRL under unknown multi-node (UMN) interventional environments and establishes the first identifiability results for general latent causal models (parametric or nonparametric) under stochastic interventions (soft or hard) and linear transformation from the latent to observed space. Specifically, it is established that given sufficiently diverse interventional environments, (i) identifiability up to ancestors is possible using only soft interventions, and (ii) perfect identifiability is possible using hard interventions. Remarkably, these guarantees match the best-known results for more restrictive single-node interventions. Furthermore, CRL algorithms are also provided that achieve the identifiability guarantees. A central step in designing these algorithms is establishing the relationships between UMN interventional CRL and score functions associated with the statistical models of different interventional environments. Establishing these relationships also serves as constructive proof of the identifiability guarantees.
6/11/2024
Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions: A General Setting
Kun Zhang, Shaoan Xie, Ignavier Ng, Yujia Zheng
0
0
In many problems, the measured variables (e.g., image pixels) are just mathematical functions of the hidden causal variables (e.g., the underlying concepts or objects). For the purpose of making predictions in changing environments or making proper changes to the system, it is helpful to recover the hidden causal variables $Z_i$ and their causal relations represented by graph $mathcal{G}_Z$. This problem has recently been known as causal representation learning. This paper is concerned with a general, completely nonparametric setting of causal representation learning from multiple distributions (arising from heterogeneous data or nonstationary time series), without assuming hard interventions behind distribution changes. We aim to develop general solutions in this fundamental case; as a by product, this helps see the unique benefit offered by other assumptions such as parametric causal models or hard interventions. We show that under the sparsity constraint on the recovered graph over the latent variables and suitable sufficient change conditions on the causal influences, interestingly, one can recover the moralized graph of the underlying directed acyclic graph, and the recovered latent variables and their relations are related to the underlying causal model in a specific, nontrivial way. In some cases, each latent variable can even be recovered up to component-wise transformations. Experimental results verify our theoretical claims.
4/11/2024