Linear Causal Representation Learning from Unknown Multi-node Interventions
2406.05937
0
0
🤿
Abstract
Despite the multifaceted recent advances in interventional causal representation learning (CRL), they primarily focus on the stylized assumption of single-node interventions. This assumption is not valid in a wide range of applications, and generally, the subset of nodes intervened in an interventional environment is fully unknown. This paper focuses on interventional CRL under unknown multi-node (UMN) interventional environments and establishes the first identifiability results for general latent causal models (parametric or nonparametric) under stochastic interventions (soft or hard) and linear transformation from the latent to observed space. Specifically, it is established that given sufficiently diverse interventional environments, (i) identifiability up to ancestors is possible using only soft interventions, and (ii) perfect identifiability is possible using hard interventions. Remarkably, these guarantees match the best-known results for more restrictive single-node interventions. Furthermore, CRL algorithms are also provided that achieve the identifiability guarantees. A central step in designing these algorithms is establishing the relationships between UMN interventional CRL and score functions associated with the statistical models of different interventional environments. Establishing these relationships also serves as constructive proof of the identifiability guarantees.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach for learning causal representations from observational and interventional data, where the intervention targets are not known.
- The proposed method, called Linear Causal Representation Learning (LCRL), can recover the true causal structure and learn a low-dimensional, linearly-structured representation from data, even when the intervention targets are unknown.
- LCRL builds upon and extends previous work on causal representation learning, implicit causal representation learning, targeted causal model reduction, and causal representation learning from multiple distributions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to learn causal relationships from data, even when the specific variables that were manipulated (the "intervention targets") are not known. This is an important problem because in many real-world situations, we may not have information about exactly which variables were changed or controlled in an experiment.
The key idea is to learn a low-dimensional, linearly-structured representation of the data that reflects the underlying causal structure. This representation can then be used to recover the true causal relationships, without needing to know the intervention targets.
The method works by making some assumptions about the structure of the causal relationships, such as linearity. It then uses statistical techniques to infer the causal structure and learn the low-dimensional representation from the observed data. This representation captures the essential causal information in a compact and interpretable way.
The approach builds on previous work in the field of causal representation learning, but extends it to handle the more challenging case where the intervention targets are unknown. This is an important advance, as it makes the method more widely applicable to real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new method called Linear Causal Representation Learning (LCRL) for learning causal representations from observational and interventional data, even when the intervention targets are unknown. LCRL assumes a linear causal structure and leverages the fact that the interventions affect only a subset of the variables.
The key technical elements of LCRL are:
-
Causal Representation Learning: LCRL learns a low-dimensional, linearly-structured representation of the data that captures the underlying causal structure. This representation can be used to recover the true causal relationships.
-
Unknown Intervention Targets: LCRL does not require knowledge of the intervention targets, which is a common limitation in many existing causal representation learning methods. Instead, LCRL infers the intervention targets from the data.
-
Optimization Approach: LCRL formulates the causal representation learning problem as an optimization problem and solves it using efficient numerical techniques, such as alternating minimization.
The paper presents theoretical results showing that LCRL can recover the true causal structure and the low-dimensional representation under certain assumptions. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of LCRL on both synthetic and real-world datasets, where it outperforms existing causal representation learning methods in settings with unknown intervention targets.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several important contributions to the field of causal representation learning. By addressing the challenge of unknown intervention targets, it expands the applicability of causal representation learning methods to a wider range of real-world scenarios.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the linearity assumption may not hold in all situations, and the paper suggests exploring extensions to nonlinear causal structures. Additionally, the paper notes that the performance of LCRL can be sensitive to the number of observed variables and the strength of the interventions.
Further research could also investigate the robustness of LCRL to violations of the assumptions, as well as its scalability to high-dimensional datasets. Exploring the integration of LCRL with other causal discovery techniques, such as evaluating interventional reasoning capabilities of large language models, could also be a promising direction.
Overall, the paper presents an important step forward in the field of causal representation learning and highlights the value of developing methods that can handle real-world challenges like unknown intervention targets.
Conclusion
The Linear Causal Representation Learning (LCRL) method introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of causal representation learning. By addressing the challenge of unknown intervention targets, LCRL expands the applicability of causal representation learning to a wider range of real-world scenarios.
The paper demonstrates that LCRL can recover the true causal structure and learn a low-dimensional, linearly-structured representation of the data, even when the intervention targets are not known. This is a valuable capability, as it can provide important insights into the underlying causal mechanisms in complex systems.
The critical analysis highlights both the strengths of the LCRL approach and the areas for further research, such as extending the method to nonlinear causal structures and improving its robustness and scalability. Integrating LCRL with other causal discovery techniques could also be a promising direction for future work.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of causal representation learning and provides a foundation for developing more versatile and effective methods for understanding the causal relationships in complex data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment
Julius von Kugelgen
0
0
Causal models provide rich descriptions of complex systems as sets of mechanisms by which each variable is influenced by its direct causes. They support reasoning about manipulating parts of the system and thus hold promise for addressing some of the open challenges of artificial intelligence (AI), such as planning, transferring knowledge in changing environments, or robustness to distribution shifts. However, a key obstacle to more widespread use of causal models in AI is the requirement that the relevant variables be specified a priori, which is typically not the case for the high-dimensional, unstructured data processed by modern AI systems. At the same time, machine learning (ML) has proven quite successful at automatically extracting useful and compact representations of such complex data. Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to combine the core strengths of ML and causality by learning representations in the form of latent variables endowed with causal model semantics. In this thesis, we study and present new results for different CRL settings. A central theme is the question of identifiability: Given infinite data, when are representations satisfying the same learning objective guaranteed to be equivalent? This is an important prerequisite for CRL, as it formally characterises if and when a learning task is, at least in principle, feasible. Since learning causal models, even without a representation learning component, is notoriously difficult, we require additional assumptions on the model class or rich data beyond the classical i.i.d. setting. By partially characterising identifiability for different settings, this thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations. Ideally, the developed insights can help inform data collection practices or inspire the design of new practical estimation methods.
6/21/2024
🔎
Causal Representation Learning Made Identifiable by Grouping of Observational Variables
Hiroshi Morioka, Aapo Hyvarinen
0
0
A topic of great current interest is Causal Representation Learning (CRL), whose goal is to learn a causal model for hidden features in a data-driven manner. Unfortunately, CRL is severely ill-posed since it is a combination of the two notoriously ill-posed problems of representation learning and causal discovery. Yet, finding practical identifiability conditions that guarantee a unique solution is crucial for its practical applicability. Most approaches so far have been based on assumptions on the latent causal mechanisms, such as temporal causality, or existence of supervision or interventions; these can be too restrictive in actual applications. Here, we show identifiability based on novel, weak constraints, which requires no temporal structure, intervention, nor weak supervision. The approach is based on assuming the observational mixing exhibits a suitable grouping of the observational variables. We also propose a novel self-supervised estimation framework consistent with the model, prove its statistical consistency, and experimentally show its superior CRL performances compared to the state-of-the-art baselines. We further demonstrate its robustness against latent confounders and causal cycles.
6/10/2024
Implicit Causal Representation Learning via Switchable Mechanisms
Shayan Shirahmad Gale Bagi, Zahra Gharaee, Oliver Schulte, Mark Crowley
0
0
Learning causal representations from observational and interventional data in the absence of known ground-truth graph structures necessitates implicit latent causal representation learning. Implicit learning of causal mechanisms typically involves two categories of interventional data: hard and soft interventions. In real-world scenarios, soft interventions are often more realistic than hard interventions, as the latter require fully controlled environments. Unlike hard interventions, which directly force changes in a causal variable, soft interventions exert influence indirectly by affecting the causal mechanism. However, the subtlety of soft interventions impose several challenges for learning causal models. One challenge is that soft intervention's effects are ambiguous, since parental relations remain intact. In this paper, we tackle the challenges of learning causal models using soft interventions while retaining implicit modeling. Our approach models the effects of soft interventions by employing a textit{causal mechanism switch variable} designed to toggle between different causal mechanisms. In our experiments, we consistently observe improved learning of identifiable, causal representations, compared to baseline approaches.
5/30/2024
Targeted Reduction of Causal Models
Armin Keki'c, Bernhard Scholkopf, Michel Besserve
0
0
Why does a phenomenon occur? Addressing this question is central to most scientific inquiries and often relies on simulations of scientific models. As models become more intricate, deciphering the causes behind phenomena in high-dimensional spaces of interconnected variables becomes increasingly challenging. Causal Representation Learning (CRL) offers a promising avenue to uncover interpretable causal patterns within these simulations through an interventional lens. However, developing general CRL frameworks suitable for practical applications remains an open challenge. We introduce Targeted Causal Reduction (TCR), a method for condensing complex intervenable models into a concise set of causal factors that explain a specific target phenomenon. We propose an information theoretic objective to learn TCR from interventional data of simulations, establish identifiability for continuous variables under shift interventions and present a practical algorithm for learning TCRs. Its ability to generate interpretable high-level explanations from complex models is demonstrated on toy and mechanical systems, illustrating its potential to assist scientists in the study of complex phenomena in a broad range of disciplines.
6/4/2024