A Taxonomy of Architecture Options for Foundation Model-based Agents: Analysis and Decision Model
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a taxonomy of architectural options for foundation model-based agents
- Analyzes the trade-offs and decision factors involved in choosing different architectural approaches
- Provides a framework to guide the design of foundation model-based agent systems
Plain English Explanation
This paper outlines a taxonomy of different ways that foundation models, a type of large language model, can be used to build intelligent software agents. Foundation models are powerful machine learning models that are trained on vast amounts of data and can be adapted for a wide variety of tasks.
The paper explores the various architectural choices that can be made when building an agent system based on a foundation model. These choices include how tightly the foundation model is integrated with the agent's other components, whether the foundation model is used for reasoning and decision-making or just for generation, and how the agent's knowledge and capabilities are expanded beyond the foundation model.
The paper analyzes the tradeoffs and decision factors involved in choosing different architectural approaches. For example, a more tightly integrated approach may provide better performance but require more custom development, while a more modular approach may be more flexible but less efficient. The paper provides a framework to help guide the design of these foundation model-based agent systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by noting the increasing prevalence of foundation model-based systems and the need for a taxonomy to understand the architectural options. It proposes a taxonomy with three high-level categories:
- Foundation Model as Component: The foundation model is tightly integrated as a key component within the agent, responsible for tasks like reasoning, decision-making, and knowledge representation.
- Foundation Model as Capability Expansion: The foundation model is used to augment the agent's capabilities, but the agent has significant additional components and functionality beyond the foundation model.
- Foundation Model as Generation Source: The foundation model is primarily used for generation, while the agent's decision-making and reasoning are handled by separate components.
Within each of these high-level categories, the paper identifies several subcategories and analyzes the trade-offs, decision factors, and design considerations for each approach. For example, in the "Foundation Model as Component" category, the subcategories include:
- Monolithic Integration: The foundation model is the sole decision-making component.
- Hybrid Integration: The foundation model is one of multiple decision-making components.
- Delegated Integration: The foundation model is used for specific tasks, with other components handling the high-level decision-making.
The paper then presents a decision model to guide the selection of the appropriate architectural approach based on factors such as performance requirements, development cost, and the desired level of control and interpretability.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the architectural options for foundation model-based agents. The taxonomy and decision framework offer a valuable tool for researchers and developers in this rapidly evolving field.
One potential limitation is that the paper focuses primarily on the technical and engineering considerations, without delving deeply into the ethical and societal implications of these systems. As foundation model-based agents become more prevalent, it will be critical to also consider issues such as transparency, accountability, and the potential for unintended consequences.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges of integrating foundation models with other types of AI systems, such as rule-based or symbolic reasoning components. As the field of AI continues to evolve, more research may be needed to understand how to effectively combine different approaches.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable framework for understanding and designing foundation model-based agent systems. By outlining a taxonomy of architectural options and analyzing the trade-offs involved, the authors offer a useful tool for researchers and developers working in this rapidly advancing field. As these systems become more prevalent, it will be crucial to also consider the broader ethical and societal implications of their deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Taxonomy of Architecture Options for Foundation Model-based Agents: Analysis and Decision Model
Jingwen Zhou, Qinghua Lu, Jieshan Chen, Liming Zhu, Xiwei Xu, Zhenchang Xing, Stefan Harrer
The rapid advancement of AI technology has led to widespread applications of agent systems across various domains. However, the need for detailed architecture design poses significant challenges in designing and operating these systems. This paper introduces a taxonomy focused on the architectures of foundation-model-based agents, addressing critical aspects such as functional capabilities and non-functional qualities. We also discuss the operations involved in both design-time and run-time phases, providing a comprehensive view of architectural design and operational characteristics. By unifying and detailing these classifications, our taxonomy aims to improve the design of foundation-model-based agents. Additionally, the paper establishes a decision model that guides critical design and runtime decisions, offering a structured approach to enhance the development of foundation-model-based agents. Our contributions include providing a structured architecture design option and guiding the development process of foundation-model-based agents, thereby addressing current fragmentation in the field.
Read more8/7/2024
📈
0
Towards Responsible Generative AI: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Agents
Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Xiwei Xu, Zhenchang Xing, Stefan Harrer, Jon Whittle
Foundation models, such as large language models (LLMs), have been widely recognised as transformative AI technologies due to their capabilities to understand and generate content, including plans with reasoning capabilities. Foundation model based agents derive their autonomy from the capabilities of foundation models, which enable them to autonomously break down a given goal into a set of manageable tasks and orchestrate task execution to meet the goal. Despite the huge efforts put into building foundation model based agents, the architecture design of the agents has not yet been systematically explored. Also, while there are significant benefits of using agents for planning and execution, there are serious considerations regarding responsible AI related software quality attributes, such as security and accountability. Therefore, this paper presents a pattern-oriented reference architecture that serves as guidance when designing foundation model based agents. We evaluate the completeness and utility of the proposed reference architecture by mapping it to the architecture of two real-world agents.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Agent Design Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Architectural Patterns for Foundation Model based Agents
Yue Liu, Sin Kit Lo, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Dehai Zhao, Xiwei Xu, Stefan Harrer, Jon Whittle
Foundation model-enabled generative artificial intelligence facilitates the development and implementation of agents, which can leverage distinguished reasoning and language processing capabilities to takes a proactive, autonomous role to pursue users' goals. Nevertheless, there is a lack of systematic knowledge to guide practitioners in designing the agents considering challenges of goal-seeking (including generating instrumental goals and plans), such as hallucinations inherent in foundation models, explainability of reasoning process, complex accountability, etc. To address this issue, we have performed a systematic literature review to understand the state-of-the-art foundation model-based agents and the broader ecosystem. In this paper, we present a pattern catalogue consisting of 17 architectural patterns with analyses of the context, forces, and trade-offs as the outcomes from the previous literature review. The proposed catalogue can provide holistic guidance for the effective use of patterns, and support the architecture design of foundation model-based agents by facilitating goal-seeking and plan generation.
Read more6/26/2024
🤖
0
Towards Responsible and Safe AI in the Era of Foudnation Models: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Systems
Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Xiwei Xu, Zhenchang Xing, Jon Whittle
The release of ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language model has drawn huge interests on foundations models. There is a broad consensus that foundations models will be the fundamental building blocks for future AI systems. However, there is a lack of systematic guidance on the architecture design. Particularly, the the rapidly growing capabilities of foundations models can eventually absorb other components of AI systems, posing challenges of moving boundary and interface evolution in architecture design. Furthermore, incorporating foundations models into AI systems raises significant concerns about responsible and safe AI due to their opaque nature and rapidly advancing intelligence. To address these challenges, the paper first presents an architecture evolution of AI systems in the era of foundation models, transitioning from foundation-model-as-a-connector to foundation-model-as-a-monolithic architecture. The paper then identifies key design decisions and proposes a pattern-oriented reference architecture for designing responsible foundation-model-based systems. The patterns can enable the potential of foundation models while ensuring associated risks.
Read more7/17/2024