Teacher agency in the age of generative AI: towards a framework of hybrid intelligence for learning design

Overview

• This paper explores the use of generative AI (genAI) in education, focusing on its impact on teachers' professional agency.
• It highlights the need to study how genAI affects teachers' ability to act, affect matters, make decisions, and take a stance - factors that are crucial for building trust in AI.
• The paper proposes a hybrid intelligence approach that combines human and artificial intelligence to support and extend teachers' learning design activities.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses how generative AI is being used in education and its impact on teachers. While genAI can help with tasks like learning design, the authors are concerned that it may negatively affect teachers' professional agency - their ability to act, influence decisions, and take a stance on important issues.

The paper argues that educational technology often prioritizes learner engagement over teacher agency, limiting teachers' ability to shape the technology they use. To address this, the authors propose a hybrid intelligence approach that combines human and artificial intelligence. This could open up new possibilities for teachers to collaborate with genAI and extend their learning design practices.

The goal is to ensure that the use of generative AI in teaching and learning supports and empowers teachers, rather than undermining their professional agency.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by highlighting the dual nature of educational technology, which needs to cater to the needs of both learners and teachers. However, the authors note that the design of educational technology often prioritizes learner agency and engagement, limiting the opportunities for teachers to influence the technology and take action.

To analyze the impact of genAI on teachers' agency, the paper identifies four key factors: (i) the ability to act, (ii) the ability to affect matters, (iii) the ability to make decisions or choices, and (iv) the ability to take a stance. The authors argue that genAI has the potential to negatively affect these aspects of teachers' professional agency, which could undermine their trust in AI.

To address this, the paper proposes a hybrid intelligence approach that combines human and artificial intelligence. This approach aims to open up new possibilities for teachers to collaborate with genAI and extend their learning design practices, rather than being replaced or constrained by the technology.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important concerns about the potential impact of genAI on teachers' professional agency, which is a crucial factor in building trust in AI technology. The authors make a strong case for the need to consider the unique needs and perspectives of teachers, rather than solely focusing on learner engagement.

However, the paper does not provide detailed empirical evidence to support its claims about the negative effects of genAI on teachers' agency. While the proposed hybrid intelligence approach is promising, the paper lacks a comprehensive evaluation of its feasibility and potential benefits.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the broader societal implications of genAI in education, such as issues of equity, accessibility, and the potential for AI-driven automation to displace teachers. Further research is needed to understand the long-term consequences of integrating genAI into educational settings.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the importance of considering teachers' professional agency in the design and deployment of generative AI in education. The authors propose a hybrid intelligence approach that combines human and artificial intelligence as a potential solution to empower teachers and extend their learning design practices.

While the paper raises valid concerns and offers a promising direction, more empirical research is needed to validate the proposed approach and explore the broader implications of generative AI in teaching and learning. Ongoing collaboration between researchers, educators, and AI developers will be crucial in shaping the future of genAI in education in a way that supports and empowers teachers.