Teaching Higher-Order Logic Using Isabelle

Read original: arXiv:2404.05458 - Published 4/9/2024 by Simon Tobias Lund (Technical University of Denmark), J{o}rgen Villadsen (Technical University of Denmark)
Total Score

0

Teaching Higher-Order Logic Using Isabelle

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses teaching higher-order logic using the Isabelle proof assistant.
  • It presents an approach and contributions for effectively teaching this advanced topic to students.
  • The paper also reviews related work in the field of teaching formal methods and theorem proving.

Plain English Explanation

Higher-order logic is a powerful mathematical system that can model complex problems and relationships. However, it can be challenging for students to learn and apply. This paper explores an approach to teaching higher-order logic using the Isabelle proof assistant, a software tool that helps users rigorously develop and verify logical proofs.

The authors' approach focuses on guiding students through hands-on exercises and interactive tutorials within the Isabelle environment. This allows students to actively engage with higher-order logic concepts and see their application in real-world examples. The paper also discusses the authors' specific contributions, such as developing educational materials and exercises to support this teaching approach.

The paper situates this work in the context of related research on teaching formal methods and theorem proving. It highlights how the Isabelle-based approach builds on and differs from other techniques for introducing advanced logic to students. By providing a more accessible and interactive learning experience, the authors aim to make higher-order logic more approachable and widely understood.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a teaching approach that leverages the Isabelle proof assistant to help students learn higher-order logic. Isabelle is a interactive theorem prover that allows users to rigorously develop and verify logical proofs.

The authors' approach focuses on guiding students through hands-on exercises and tutorials within the Isabelle environment. This includes introducing higher-order logic concepts, demonstrating their application in Isabelle, and having students complete exercises to reinforce their understanding. The authors have also developed educational materials and example proof scripts to support this teaching method.

The paper situates this work in the context of related research on teaching formal methods and theorem proving, such as using large language models for de-formalization of natural language and modeling multiplicative linear logic via deep inference. The authors highlight how their Isabelle-based approach builds on and differs from other techniques for introducing advanced logic to students, with the goal of making higher-order logic more accessible and widely understood.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed approach for teaching higher-order logic using the Isabelle proof assistant. The authors' focus on interactive, hands-on exercises within the Isabelle environment is a strength, as it allows students to directly engage with the concepts and see their application.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or challenges that may arise when implementing this teaching approach. For example, it does not discuss the level of prerequisite knowledge students may need, the time and resources required to develop the necessary educational materials, or potential difficulties in onboarding students to the Isabelle tool.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the specific learning outcomes and assessment methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of this teaching approach. Providing formalized mathematical problems for engineers or analyzing the proceedings of the International Workshop on Theorem Proving Components may offer relevant insights to further strengthen the research.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach for teaching higher-order logic, but would be strengthened by addressing potential limitations and providing more details on the evaluation and outcomes of this teaching method.

Conclusion

This paper explores an approach to teaching higher-order logic using the Isabelle proof assistant, a powerful tool for developing and verifying logical proofs. The authors' focus on interactive, hands-on exercises within the Isabelle environment aims to make this advanced topic more accessible and engaging for students.

By situating this work in the context of related research on teaching formal methods and theorem proving, the paper highlights how the Isabelle-based approach builds on and differs from other techniques. While the paper presents a well-designed teaching approach, it could be further strengthened by discussing potential limitations and providing more details on the evaluation and outcomes of this method.

Overall, the paper contributes valuable insights into effective ways of introducing higher-order logic to students, which has important implications for advancing the understanding and application of this powerful mathematical system.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Teaching Higher-Order Logic Using Isabelle
Total Score

0

Teaching Higher-Order Logic Using Isabelle

Simon Tobias Lund (Technical University of Denmark), J{o}rgen Villadsen (Technical University of Denmark)

We present a formalization of higher-order logic in the Isabelle proof assistant, building directly on the foundational framework Isabelle/Pure and developed to be as small and readable as possible. It should therefore serve as a good introduction for someone looking into learning about higher-order logic and proof assistants, without having to study the much more complex Isabelle/HOL with heavier automation. To showcase our development and approach we explain a sample proof, describe the axioms and rules of our higher-order logic, and discuss our experience with teaching the subject in a classroom setting.

Read more

4/9/2024

📈

Total Score

0

The Stable Model Semantics for Higher-Order Logic Programming

Bart Bogaerts, Angelos Charalambidis, Giannos Chatziagapis, Babis Kostopoulos, Samuele Pollaci, Panos Rondogiannis

We propose a stable model semantics for higher-order logic programs. Our semantics is developed using Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT), a powerful formalism that has successfully been used to give meaning to diverse non-monotonic formalisms. The proposed semantics generalizes the classical two-valued stable model semantics of (Gelfond and Lifschitz 1988) as-well-as the three-valued one of (Przymusinski 1990), retaining their desirable properties. Due to the use of AFT, we also get for free alternative semantics for higher-order logic programs, namely supported model, Kripke-Kleene, and well-founded. Additionally, we define a broad class of stratified higher-order logic programs and demonstrate that they have a unique two-valued higher-order stable model which coincides with the well-founded semantics of such programs. We provide a number of examples in different application domains, which demonstrate that higher-order logic programming under the stable model semantics is a powerful and versatile formalism, which can potentially form the basis of novel ASP systems.

Read more

8/21/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

AI for Mathematics Mathematical Formalized Problem Solving and Theorem Proving in Different Fields in Lean4

Xichen Tang

Using computerized verifiable formal languages like Lean 4 to prove mathematical theorems has a significant impact on mathematical formalization. Lean 4 offers prominent potential for advancing mathematical reasoning. However, existing efforts are limited to mathematical formalization languages in substantial online corpora and are dedicated to keeping pace with rapidly evolving languages. To bridge the gap between the traditional and computerized proof, my approach to formalizing theorem proving involves generating formal steps and complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs. The method is to introduce the basic structure and tactics in general, determine how AI can assist the mathematical formalization process to improve its performance, and give examples of solving problems in Lean 4 comparing to NL, mainly in IMO, and a sample theorem proving in abstract algebra.

Read more

9/11/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Formally Verified Approximate Policy Iteration

Maximilian Schaffeler, Mohammad Abdulaziz

We formally verify an algorithm for approximate policy iteration on Factored Markov Decision Processes using the interactive theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. Next, we show how the formalized algorithm can be refined to an executable, verified implementation. The implementation is evaluated on benchmark problems to show its practicability. As part of the refinement, we develop verified software to certify Linear Programming solutions. The algorithm builds on a diverse library of formalized mathematics and pushes existing methodologies for interactive theorem provers to the limits. We discuss the process of the verification project and the modifications to the algorithm needed for formal verification.

Read more

6/12/2024