On Temperature Scaling and Conformal Prediction of Deep Classifiers

Read original: arXiv:2402.05806 - Published 7/8/2024 by Lahav Dabah, Tom Tirer

🔮

Overview

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used for classification tasks, but their predictions need to be accompanied by some indication of confidence
Two popular approaches for this are calibration (modifying the classifier's softmax values) and conformal prediction (producing a prediction set that contains the true label with a specified probability)
The interplay between these two techniques has not been well-investigated

Plain English Explanation

When a deep learning model makes a prediction, it's often useful to know how confident the model is in its prediction. Two common ways to provide this confidence information are calibration and conformal prediction.

Calibration modifies the model's output probabilities (the softmax values) so that the highest probability better reflects the true likelihood of the prediction being correct. Conformal prediction, on the other hand, produces a set of possible predictions that is guaranteed to contain the true label a specified percentage of the time, rather than just giving a single prediction.

While both of these techniques are valuable, the researchers in this paper wanted to understand how they interact. They found that while a popular calibration method called temperature scaling can improve the coverage (i.e., the percentage of time the true label is in the prediction set) of some conformal prediction methods, it can also increase the size of those prediction sets in an unintuitive way. The paper explores this effect in depth and provides guidance for practitioners on how to balance prediction set size and coverage when using these techniques together.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts with an empirical study on the effect of temperature scaling (TS) calibration on prominent conformal prediction (CP) methods. They find that while TS improves the class-conditional coverage of adaptive CP methods, it surprisingly negatively affects their prediction set sizes.

The researchers then explore the effect of TS beyond its calibration application and offer guidelines for practitioners to balance prediction set size and conditional coverage of adaptive CP methods when combining them with calibration. Finally, they present a theoretical analysis of the effect of TS on the prediction set sizes, revealing mathematical properties of the procedure that explain this unintuitive phenomenon.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and rigorous exploration of the interplay between calibration and conformal prediction, which is an important and under-investigated topic. The researchers acknowledge some limitations, such as the need for further investigation into other calibration methods and their effects on a wider range of conformal prediction techniques.

One potential concern is the reliance on theoretical analysis to explain the unintuitive empirical findings. While the mathematical insights are valuable, it would be interesting to see if the phenomenon can also be explained or validated through additional empirical studies or simulations.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to understanding how to effectively combine these two important confidence indication techniques, and the guidelines provided will likely be useful for practitioners working on classification problems in deep learning.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the interplay between two popular approaches for providing confidence information with deep learning predictions: calibration and conformal prediction. The researchers found that while a common calibration method can improve the coverage of some conformal prediction techniques, it can also unexpectedly increase the size of their prediction sets.

By exploring this effect in depth, both empirically and theoretically, the paper provides valuable insights and guidelines for practitioners on how to balance prediction set size and coverage when using these techniques together. This work advances the understanding of how to effectively combine calibration and conformal prediction to deliver reliable and informative predictions in real-world classification applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔮

On Temperature Scaling and Conformal Prediction of Deep Classifiers

Lahav Dabah, Tom Tirer

In many classification applications, the prediction of a deep neural network (DNN) based classifier needs to be accompanied by some confidence indication. Two popular approaches for that aim are: 1) Calibration: modifies the classifier's softmax values such that the maximal value better estimates the correctness probability; and 2) Conformal Prediction (CP): produces a prediction set of candidate labels that contains the true label with a user-specified probability, guaranteeing marginal coverage, rather than, e.g., per class coverage. In practice, both types of indications are desirable, yet, so far the interplay between them has not been investigated. We start this paper with an extensive empirical study of the effect of the popular Temperature Scaling (TS) calibration on prominent CP methods and reveal that while it improves the class-conditional coverage of adaptive CP methods, surprisingly, it negatively affects their prediction set sizes. Subsequently, we explore the effect of TS beyond its calibration application and offer simple guidelines for practitioners to trade prediction set size and conditional coverage of adaptive CP methods while effectively combining them with calibration. Finally, we present a theoretical analysis of the effect of TS on the prediction set sizes, revealing several mathematical properties of the procedure, according to which we provide reasoning for this unintuitive phenomenon.

7/8/2024

Conformal Prediction for Deep Classifier via Label Ranking

Jianguo Huang, Huajun Xi, Linjun Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Yue Qiu, Hongxin Wei

Conformal prediction is a statistical framework that generates prediction sets containing ground-truth labels with a desired coverage guarantee. The predicted probabilities produced by machine learning models are generally miscalibrated, leading to large prediction sets in conformal prediction. To address this issue, we propose a novel algorithm named $textit{Sorted Adaptive Prediction Sets}$ (SAPS), which discards all the probability values except for the maximum softmax probability. The key idea behind SAPS is to minimize the dependence of the non-conformity score on the probability values while retaining the uncertainty information. In this manner, SAPS can produce compact prediction sets and communicate instance-wise uncertainty. Extensive experiments validate that SAPS not only lessens the prediction sets but also broadly enhances the conditional coverage rate of prediction sets.

6/7/2024

Calibrating Where It Matters: Constrained Temperature Scaling

Stephen McKenna, Jacob Carse

We consider calibration of convolutional classifiers for diagnostic decision making. Clinical decision makers can use calibrated classifiers to minimise expected costs given their own cost function. Such functions are usually unknown at training time. If minimising expected costs is the primary aim, algorithms should focus on tuning calibration in regions of probability simplex likely to effect decisions. We give an example, modifying temperature scaling calibration, and demonstrate improved calibration where it matters using convnets trained to classify dermoscopy images.

6/18/2024

Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-Classification

Etash Guha, Shlok Natarajan, Thomas Mollenhoff, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Eugene Ndiaye

Conformal prediction (CP) for regression can be challenging, especially when the output distribution is heteroscedastic, multimodal, or skewed. Some of the issues can be addressed by estimating a distribution over the output, but in reality, such approaches can be sensitive to estimation error and yield unstable intervals.~Here, we circumvent the challenges by converting regression to a classification problem and then use CP for classification to obtain CP sets for regression.~To preserve the ordering of the continuous-output space, we design a new loss function and make necessary modifications to the CP classification techniques.~Empirical results on many benchmarks shows that this simple approach gives surprisingly good results on many practical problems.

4/15/2024