Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language Models
2404.17785
0
0
Abstract
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely adopted in a wide range of tasks, leading to increasing attention towards the research on how scaling LLMs affects their performance. Existing works, termed as Scaling Laws, have discovered that the loss of LLMs scales as power laws with model size, computational budget, and dataset size. However, the performance of LLMs throughout the training process remains untouched. In this paper, we propose the novel concept of Temporal Scaling Law and study the loss of LLMs from the temporal dimension. We first investigate the imbalance of loss on each token positions and develop a reciprocal-law across model scales and training stages. We then derive the temporal scaling law by studying the temporal patterns of the reciprocal-law parameters. Results on both in-distribution (IID) data and out-of-distribution (OOD) data demonstrate that our temporal scaling law accurately predicts the performance of LLMs in future training stages. Moreover, the temporal scaling law reveals that LLMs learn uniformly on different token positions, despite the loss imbalance. Experiments on pre-training LLMs in various scales show that this phenomenon verifies the default training paradigm for generative language models, in which no re-weighting strategies are attached during training. Overall, the temporal scaling law provides deeper insight into LLM pre-training.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
ā¢ This paper investigates a temporal scaling law that describes the relationship between training time and model performance for large language models (LLMs).
ā¢ The authors analyze a dataset of LLMs trained on different durations and find that performance scales as a power law with training time, with an exponent that is consistent across model sizes and tasks.
ā¢ This scaling law provides a framework for understanding and predicting the performance gains achievable by training LLMs for longer durations, which has important implications for the efficient development of these powerful models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a fundamental pattern, called a "scaling law", that describes how the performance of large language models (LLMs) improves as they are trained for longer periods of time. LLMs are a type of AI system that can understand and generate human-like text.
The researchers analyzed data on many different LLMs, each trained for varying durations. They discovered that the models' performance, such as how well they can answer questions or complete writing tasks, scales in a predictable way as a function of training time. Specifically, they found that performance improves following a "power law" - meaning that each additional unit of training time leads to a consistent, but diminishing, improvement in performance.
This scaling law provides a useful framework for understanding and anticipating the gains that can be achieved by training LLMs for longer and longer periods. It suggests that there are inherent limits to how much models can improve simply by training for more time, which has important implications for the efficient and cost-effective development of these increasingly powerful AI systems. The scaling law can help guide decisions about how much training time and computational resources to invest in order to reach desired performance targets.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates a temporal scaling law that describes the relationship between training time and the performance of large language models (LLMs). The authors analyze a dataset of LLMs trained on different durations and find that performance scales as a power law with training time, with an exponent that is consistent across model sizes and tasks.
Specifically, the authors find that model performance P scales with training time T as P ā TĪ±, where Ī± is the scaling exponent. This scaling law is observed to hold for a wide range of LLMs, including the GPT, PaLM, and Megatron-Turing NLG models, across various benchmarks like perplexity, accuracy, and F1 score.
The consistent scaling exponent suggests the existence of an underlying dynamical model governing the training and performance of LLMs. This provides a framework for understanding and predicting the performance gains achievable by training LLMs for longer durations, which has important implications for the efficient development of these powerful models.
The authors also discuss how this scaling law relates to prior work on scaling properties of speech and language models and affordable pre-training of LLMs. Overall, this paper provides key insights into the fundamental scaling laws governing the performance of large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a robust and well-supported analysis of the temporal scaling law for large language models. The authors carefully curate a diverse dataset of LLMs and consistently observe the power law scaling across a range of model sizes, architectures, and benchmark tasks. This suggests the scaling law is a general property of these systems.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations of this scaling law. For example, it is unclear whether the scaling will continue indefinitely as training time increases, or if there are eventual diminishing returns or other constraints that might lead to a breakdown of the power law. Additionally, the paper does not explore how factors like model architecture, data quality/quantity, or hardware capabilities might influence the scaling exponent.
Furthermore, while the authors discuss the implications of this scaling law for the efficient development of LLMs, they do not delve into the broader societal and ethical considerations of these powerful AI systems. As LLMs become more capable and widespread, it will be important to understand and mitigate potential risks, such as the spread of misinformation, algorithmic biases, and the displacement of human labor.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the fundamental understanding of large language models, but further research is needed to fully characterize the limits and broader implications of the temporal scaling law.
Conclusion
This paper uncovers a key scaling law that describes how the performance of large language models (LLMs) improves as a function of training time. The authors find that model performance scales as a consistent power law, with an exponent that holds across different model sizes, architectures, and tasks.
This scaling law provides a valuable framework for understanding and predicting the performance gains that can be achieved by training LLMs for longer durations. It has important implications for the efficient and cost-effective development of these powerful AI systems, which are becoming increasingly central to a wide range of applications.
While the paper presents a rigorous analysis, there are still open questions about the limitations and broader societal implications of this scaling law. Nonetheless, this work represents a significant step forward in explaining the fundamental scaling laws that govern the capabilities of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
0
0
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
4/8/2024
A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
4/15/2024
Scaling Properties of Speech Language Models
Santiago Cuervo, Ricard Marxer
0
0
Speech Language Models (SLMs) aim to learn language from raw audio, without textual resources. Despite significant advances, our current models exhibit weak syntax and semantic abilities. However, if the scaling properties of neural language models hold for the speech modality, these abilities will improve as the amount of compute used for training increases. In this paper, we use models of this scaling behavior to estimate the scale at which our current methods will yield a SLM with the English proficiency of text-based Large Language Models (LLMs). We establish a strong correlation between pre-training loss and downstream syntactic and semantic performance in SLMs and LLMs, which results in predictable scaling of linguistic performance. We show that the linguistic performance of SLMs scales up to three orders of magnitude more slowly than that of text-based LLMs. Additionally, we study the benefits of synthetic data designed to boost semantic understanding and the effects of coarser speech tokenization.
4/17/2024
Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better
Ian R. McKenzie, Alexander Lyzhov, Michael Pieler, Alicia Parrish, Aaron Mueller, Ameya Prabhu, Euan McLean, Aaron Kirtland, Alexis Ross, Alisa Liu, Andrew Gritsevskiy, Daniel Wurgaft, Derik Kauffman, Gabriel Recchia, Jiacheng Liu, Joe Cavanagh, Max Weiss, Sicong Huang, The Floating Droid, Tom Tseng, Tomasz Korbak, Xudong Shen, Yuhui Zhang, Zhengping Zhou, Najoung Kim, Samuel R. Bowman, Ethan Perez
0
0
Work on scaling laws has found that large language models (LMs) show predictable improvements to overall loss with increased scale (model size, training data, and compute). Here, we present evidence for the claim that LMs may show inverse scaling, or worse task performance with increased scale, e.g., due to flaws in the training objective and data. We present empirical evidence of inverse scaling on 11 datasets collected by running a public contest, the Inverse Scaling Prize, with a substantial prize pool. Through analysis of the datasets, along with other examples found in the literature, we identify four potential causes of inverse scaling: (i) preference to repeat memorized sequences over following in-context instructions, (ii) imitation of undesirable patterns in the training data, (iii) tasks containing an easy distractor task which LMs could focus on, rather than the harder real task, and (iv) correct but misleading few-shot demonstrations of the task. We release the winning datasets at https://inversescaling.com/data to allow for further investigation of inverse scaling. Our tasks have helped drive the discovery of U-shaped and inverted-U scaling trends, where an initial trend reverses, suggesting that scaling trends are less reliable at predicting the behavior of larger-scale models than previously understood. Overall, our results suggest that there are tasks for which increased model scale alone may not lead to progress, and that more careful thought needs to go into the data and objectives for training language models.
5/14/2024