nanoLM: an Affordable LLM Pre-training Benchmark via Accurate Loss Prediction across Scales
2304.06875
0
7
🔮
Abstract
As language models scale up, it becomes increasingly expensive to verify research ideas because conclusions on small models do not trivially transfer to large ones. A possible solution is to establish a generic system that accurately predicts certain metrics for large models without training them. Existing scaling laws require hyperparameter search on the largest models, limiting their predicative capability. In this paper, we present an approach (namely {mu}Scaling) to predict the pre-training loss, based on our observations that Maximal Update Parametrization ({mu}P) enables accurate fitting of scaling laws close to common loss basins in hyperparameter space. With {mu}Scaling, different model designs can be compared on large scales by training only their smaller counterparts. Further, we introduce nanoLM: an affordable LLM pre-training benchmark that facilitates this new research paradigm. With around 14% of the one-time pre-training cost, we can accurately forecast the loss for models up to 52B. Our goal with nanoLM is to empower researchers with limited resources to reach meaningful conclusions on large models. We also aspire for our benchmark to serve as a bridge between the academic community and the industry. Code for {mu}Scaling is available at https://github.com/cofe-ai/Mu-scaling. Code for nanoLLM will be available later.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- As language models get larger, it becomes increasingly expensive to verify research ideas because conclusions on small models don't always apply to large ones.
- To address this, the authors present an approach called μScaling to accurately predict certain metrics for large models without training them.
- The authors also introduce nanoLM, an affordable LLM pre-training benchmark, to enable researchers with limited resources to reach meaningful conclusions on large models.
Plain English Explanation
As language models grow in size and complexity, it becomes increasingly challenging and costly to test new ideas on these large models. The conclusions drawn from experiments on smaller models don't always hold true when applied to their larger counterparts. To solve this problem, the researchers developed a technique called μScaling that can accurately predict the pre-training loss of large language models without actually training them.
This is a significant advancement because it allows researchers to compare different model designs at a large scale by only training their smaller versions. The authors also introduce nanoLM, an affordable pre-training benchmark for large language models, which can help researchers with limited resources to reach meaningful conclusions about the performance of large models. The goal is to empower researchers to explore and validate their ideas on a larger scale, without the need for expensive training of the full-sized models.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind μScaling is the observation that Maximal Update Parametrization (μP) enables accurate fitting of scaling laws close to common loss basins in the hyperparameter space. This means that by training smaller models using μP, the authors can accurately predict the pre-training loss of much larger models without actually training them.
The authors introduce nanoLM, an affordable LLM pre-training benchmark, to facilitate this new research paradigm. With only around 14% of the one-time pre-training cost of a large model, researchers can use nanoLM to forecast the loss for models up to 52 billion parameters. This allows researchers with limited resources to explore ideas and reach meaningful conclusions about the performance of large language models.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper addresses an important challenge in the field of large language models. The authors have proposed a novel approach, μScaling, that can accurately predict the pre-training loss of large models without actually training them, which could significantly reduce the cost and time required for verifying research ideas.
However, the authors do acknowledge that their approach relies on the assumption that the scaling laws learned on smaller models can be accurately extrapolated to larger ones. This assumption may not always hold true, and there could be unforeseen factors that influence the performance of large language models in ways that are not captured by the scaling laws. Additionally, the authors mention that their nanoLM benchmark is limited to pre-training loss prediction and may not necessarily reflect the performance of models on downstream tasks.
Further research is needed to understand the limitations of the μScaling approach and to explore ways to extend it to other performance metrics beyond pre-training loss. Additionally, it would be valuable to investigate the generalizability of the nanoLM benchmark to different language domains and tasks.
Conclusion
The research presented in this paper offers a promising solution to the challenge of verifying research ideas on large language models. The μScaling approach and the nanoLM benchmark have the potential to empower researchers with limited resources to explore and validate their ideas on a larger scale, without the need for expensive training of full-sized models. This could accelerate progress in the field of large language models and lead to more efficient and cost-effective research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategies
Shengding Hu, Yuge Tu, Xu Han, Chaoqun He, Ganqu Cui, Xiang Long, Zhi Zheng, Yewei Fang, Yuxiang Huang, Weilin Zhao, Xinrong Zhang, Zheng Leng Thai, Kaihuo Zhang, Chongyi Wang, Yuan Yao, Chenyang Zhao, Jie Zhou, Jie Cai, Zhongwu Zhai, Ning Ding, Chao Jia, Guoyang Zeng, Dahai Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
0
0
The burgeoning interest in developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with up to trillion parameters has been met with concerns regarding resource efficiency and practical expense, particularly given the immense cost of experimentation. This scenario underscores the importance of exploring the potential of Small Language Models (SLMs) as a resource-efficient alternative. In this context, we introduce MiniCPM, specifically the 1.2B and 2.4B non-embedding parameter variants, not only excel in their respective categories but also demonstrate capabilities on par with 7B-13B LLMs. While focusing on SLMs, our approach exhibits scalability in both model and data dimensions for future LLM research. Regarding model scaling, we employ extensive model wind tunnel experiments for stable and optimal scaling. For data scaling, we introduce a Warmup-Stable-Decay (WSD) learning rate scheduler (LRS), conducive to continuous training and domain adaptation. We present an in-depth analysis of the intriguing training dynamics that occurred in the WSD LRS. With WSD LRS, we are now able to efficiently study data-model scaling law without extensive retraining experiments on both axes of model and data, from which we derive the much higher compute optimal data-model ratio than Chinchilla Optimal. Additionally, we introduce MiniCPM family, including MiniCPM-DPO, MiniCPM-MoE and MiniCPM-128K, whose excellent performance further cementing MiniCPM's foundation in diverse SLM applications. MiniCPM models are available publicly at https://github.com/OpenBMB/MiniCPM .
4/23/2024
Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language Models
Yizhe Xiong, Xiansheng Chen, Xin Ye, Hui Chen, Zijia Lin, Haoran Lian, Jianwei Niu, Guiguang Ding
0
0
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely adopted in a wide range of tasks, leading to increasing attention towards the research on how scaling LLMs affects their performance. Existing works, termed as Scaling Laws, have discovered that the loss of LLMs scales as power laws with model size, computational budget, and dataset size. However, the performance of LLMs throughout the training process remains untouched. In this paper, we propose the novel concept of Temporal Scaling Law and study the loss of LLMs from the temporal dimension. We first investigate the imbalance of loss on each token positions and develop a reciprocal-law across model scales and training stages. We then derive the temporal scaling law by studying the temporal patterns of the reciprocal-law parameters. Results on both in-distribution (IID) data and out-of-distribution (OOD) data demonstrate that our temporal scaling law accurately predicts the performance of LLMs in future training stages. Moreover, the temporal scaling law reveals that LLMs learn uniformly on different token positions, despite the loss imbalance. Experiments on pre-training LLMs in various scales show that this phenomenon verifies the default training paradigm for generative language models, in which no re-weighting strategies are attached during training. Overall, the temporal scaling law provides deeper insight into LLM pre-training.
4/30/2024
💬
Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Models
Ruijie Xu, Zengzhi Wang, Run-Ze Fan, Pengfei Liu
0
0
Amid the expanding use of pre-training data, the phenomenon of benchmark dataset leakage has become increasingly prominent, exacerbated by opaque training processes and the often undisclosed inclusion of supervised data in contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs). This issue skews benchmark effectiveness and fosters potentially unfair comparisons, impeding the field's healthy development. To address this, we introduce a detection pipeline utilizing Perplexity and N-gram accuracy, two simple and scalable metrics that gauge a model's prediction precision on benchmark, to identify potential data leakages. By analyzing 31 LLMs under the context of mathematical reasoning, we reveal substantial instances of training even test set misuse, resulting in potentially unfair comparisons. These findings prompt us to offer several recommendations regarding model documentation, benchmark setup, and future evaluations. Notably, we propose the Benchmark Transparency Card to encourage clear documentation of benchmark utilization, promoting transparency and healthy developments of LLMs. we have made our leaderboard, pipeline implementation, and model predictions publicly available, fostering future research.
4/30/2024
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
0
0
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
4/8/2024