Theoretical guarantees in KL for Diffusion Flow Matching
0
👁️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Flow Matching (FM) is a class of generative models that aims to bridge a target distribution with an auxiliary distribution.
- It uses a fixed coupling and a bridge that can be either deterministic or stochastic.
- The main contribution of this paper is to provide assumptions on the target distribution, auxiliary distribution, and coupling to obtain non-asymptotic guarantees for Diffusion Flow Matching (DFM) models using the Brownian motion as the bridge.
Plain English Explanation
Flow Matching (FM) is a type of generative model, which means it can create new data that is similar to a given dataset. The goal of FM is to take a target distribution (the distribution of the data we want to generate) and an auxiliary distribution (a simpler distribution we can work with), and find a way to transform the auxiliary distribution into the target distribution.
To do this, FM uses two key ingredients: a fixed coupling (a way to connect the target and auxiliary distributions) and a bridge (a path that connects the two distributions). This bridge can be either deterministic (a fixed path) or stochastic (a random path).
The main contribution of this paper is to provide some reasonable assumptions about the target distribution, auxiliary distribution, and coupling, and then show that the Diffusion Flow Matching (DFM) model, which uses the Brownian motion as the bridge, can be used to generate samples that are close to the target distribution. Specifically, the paper establishes bounds on the Kullback-Leibler divergence (a measure of how different two distributions are) between the target distribution and the distribution generated by the DFM model.
Technical Explanation
Flow Matching (FM) is a class of generative models that aims to bridge the target distribution $\nu^*$ with an auxiliary distribution $\mu$, using a fixed coupling $\pi$ and a bridge that can be either deterministic or stochastic. The bridge and the coupling define a path measure, which can then be approximated by learning the drift of its Markovian projection.
The key contribution of this paper is to provide relatively mild assumptions on $\nu^
- Moment conditions on the score (the gradient of the log-density) of $\nu^*$, $\mu$, and $\pi$
- A standard $L^2$-drift-approximation error assumption
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation for the Diffusion Flow Matching (DFM) model, establishing non-asymptotic guarantees on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the target distribution and the distribution generated by the model. This is an important result, as it helps to understand the convergence properties of the model and its ability to accurately approximate the target distribution.
However, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation of the DFM model, so it is difficult to assess how the model performs in practice. Additionally, the assumptions made in the paper, such as the moment conditions on the score and the $L^2$-drift-approximation error, may be difficult to verify in real-world scenarios, which could limit the practical applicability of the results.
Further research could explore the empirical performance of the DFM model, as well as investigate ways to relax the assumptions made in this paper or develop alternative theoretical guarantees that are more easily applicable to real-world problems.
Conclusion
Flow Matching (FM) is a promising class of generative models that aims to bridge a target distribution with an auxiliary distribution using a fixed coupling and a stochastic or deterministic bridge. The main contribution of this paper is to provide theoretical guarantees for the Diffusion Flow Matching (DFM) model, which uses the Brownian motion as the bridge.
The paper establishes bounds on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the target distribution and the distribution generated by the DFM model, under relatively mild assumptions on the target distribution, auxiliary distribution, and coupling. This result helps to understand the convergence properties of the DFM model and its ability to accurately approximate the target distribution.
While the theoretical contribution of the paper is significant, further research is needed to evaluate the empirical performance of the DFM model and explore ways to relax the assumptions made in this paper or develop alternative theoretical guarantees that are more easily applicable to real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
0
Theoretical guarantees in KL for Diffusion Flow Matching
Marta Gentiloni Silveri, Giovanni Conforti, Alain Durmus
Flow Matching (FM) (also referred to as stochastic interpolants or rectified flows) stands out as a class of generative models that aims to bridge in finite time the target distribution $nu^star$ with an auxiliary distribution $mu$, leveraging a fixed coupling $pi$ and a bridge which can either be deterministic or stochastic. These two ingredients define a path measure which can then be approximated by learning the drift of its Markovian projection. The main contribution of this paper is to provide relatively mild assumptions on $nu^star$, $mu$ and $pi$ to obtain non-asymptotics guarantees for Diffusion Flow Matching (DFM) models using as bridge the conditional distribution associated with the Brownian motion. More precisely, we establish bounds on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the target distribution and the one generated by such DFM models under moment conditions on the score of $nu^star$, $mu$ and $pi$, and a standard $L^2$-drift-approximation error assumption.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Flow matching achieves minimax optimal convergence
Kenji Fukumizu, Taiji Suzuki, Noboru Isobe, Kazusato Oko, Masanori Koyama
Flow matching (FM) has gained significant attention as a simulation-free generative model. Unlike diffusion models, which are based on stochastic differential equations, FM employs a simpler approach by solving an ordinary differential equation with an initial condition from a normal distribution, thus streamlining the sample generation process. This paper discusses the convergence properties of FM in terms of the $p$-Wasserstein distance, a measure of distributional discrepancy. We establish that FM can achieve the minmax optimal convergence rate for $1 leq p leq 2$, presenting the first theoretical evidence that FM can reach convergence rates comparable to those of diffusion models. Our analysis extends existing frameworks by examining a broader class of mean and variance functions for the vector fields and identifies specific conditions necessary to attain these optimal rates.
Read more6/3/2024
📊
0
Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold
Kacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang, Alexander Tong, Michael Bronstein, Avishek Joey Bose, Francesco Di Giovanni
Matching objectives underpin the success of modern generative models and rely on constructing conditional paths that transform a source distribution into a target distribution. Despite being a fundamental building block, conditional paths have been designed principally under the assumption of Euclidean geometry, resulting in straight interpolations. However, this can be particularly restrictive for tasks such as trajectory inference, where straight paths might lie outside the data manifold, thus failing to capture the underlying dynamics giving rise to the observed marginals. In this paper, we propose Metric Flow Matching (MFM), a novel simulation-free framework for conditional flow matching where interpolants are approximate geodesics learned by minimizing the kinetic energy of a data-induced Riemannian metric. This way, the generative model matches vector fields on the data manifold, which corresponds to lower uncertainty and more meaningful interpolations. We prescribe general metrics to instantiate MFM, independent of the task, and test it on a suite of challenging problems including LiDAR navigation, unpaired image translation, and modeling cellular dynamics. We observe that MFM outperforms the Euclidean baselines, particularly achieving SOTA on single-cell trajectory prediction.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Flow Map Matching
Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael S. Albergo, Eric Vanden-Eijnden
Generative models based on dynamical transport of measure, such as diffusion models, flow matching models, and stochastic interpolants, learn an ordinary or stochastic differential equation whose trajectories push initial conditions from a known base distribution onto the target. While training is cheap, samples are generated via simulation, which is more expensive than one-step models like GANs. To close this gap, we introduce flow map matching -- an algorithm that learns the two-time flow map of an underlying ordinary differential equation. The approach leads to an efficient few-step generative model whose step count can be chosen a-posteriori to smoothly trade off accuracy for computational expense. Leveraging the stochastic interpolant framework, we introduce losses for both direct training of flow maps and distillation from pre-trained (or otherwise known) velocity fields. Theoretically, we show that our approach unifies many existing few-step generative models, including consistency models, consistency trajectory models, progressive distillation, and neural operator approaches, which can be obtained as particular cases of our formalism. With experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 32x32, we show that flow map matching leads to high-quality samples with significantly reduced sampling cost compared to diffusion or stochastic interpolant methods.
Read more6/12/2024