Flow matching achieves minimax optimal convergence

Read original: arXiv:2405.20879 - Published 6/3/2024 by Kenji Fukumizu, Taiji Suzuki, Noboru Isobe, Kazusato Oko, Masanori Koyama
Total Score

0

Flow matching achieves minimax optimal convergence

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method called "flow matching" that achieves optimal convergence rates for training generative models.
  • The approach involves aligning the data distribution with a learned flow-based generative model by minimizing a Wasserstein distance between the two distributions.
  • The authors prove that their flow matching method achieves the minimax optimal convergence rate, outperforming previous techniques for training flow-based models.

Plain English Explanation

Generative models are a type of machine learning algorithm that can create new data samples that are similar to a given set of training data. Flow-based generative models are a particular class of these models that use a series of invertible transformations, called a "flow," to map simple noise distributions to complex data distributions.

Training these flow-based models typically involves minimizing a certain distance metric, like the Wasserstein distance, between the model's generated distribution and the real data distribution. The paper introduces a new training method called "flow matching" that achieves the fastest possible convergence rate for this optimization problem.

The key insight is to align the flow-based model's distribution with the real data distribution in a clever way, by finding an optimal "matching" between the two distributions. This matching process allows the model to learn the most direct trajectories from noise to data, leading to faster convergence. The authors prove that their flow matching method is "minimax optimal," meaning it converges at the fastest possible rate allowed by the problem setup.

Technical Explanation

The authors formulate training flow-based generative models as a minimax optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the Wasserstein distance between the model's distribution and the true data distribution. They show that this problem can be recast as a "flow matching" problem, where the objective is to find an optimal transport plan (a.k.a. matching) between the two distributions.

By cleverly parameterizing the transport plan using a neural network, the authors are able to derive a gradient-based optimization algorithm that provably converges to the minimax optimal solution at the fastest possible rate. This is in contrast to previous approaches, such as Switched Flow Matching, which had suboptimal convergence guarantees.

The key technical contributions include:

  • Formulating flow-based generative model training as a minimax optimal transport problem
  • Parameterizing the transport plan using a neural network and deriving an efficient optimization algorithm
  • Proving that their "flow matching" method achieves the minimax optimal convergence rate

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough theoretical analysis of their flow matching approach, including rigorous convergence guarantees. However, as with any theoretical work, there are some potential limitations that could be explored in future research:

  • The analysis assumes the optimization problem is convex, which may not hold in practice for more complex generative models. Extending the analysis to nonconvex settings would be valuable.
  • The experiments are mostly on synthetic datasets, so further validation on real-world, high-dimensional data would help assess the practical efficacy of the method.
  • The authors do not discuss the computational complexity or runtime of their algorithm compared to other flow-based training approaches. Understanding the tradeoffs in terms of speed and memory usage would be helpful.
  • While the minimax optimality is a strong theoretical guarantee, it would be interesting to see how the method performs relative to heuristic training techniques in terms of sample quality and diversity of generated samples.

Overall, this paper makes an important theoretical contribution to the field of flow-based generative modeling, but there are still opportunities to further validate and expand upon the insights in practical settings.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new training method called "flow matching" for flow-based generative models that provably achieves the minimax optimal convergence rate. By recasting the training objective as an optimal transport problem and cleverly parameterizing the transport plan, the authors derive an efficient algorithm with strong theoretical guarantees.

While the work is primarily theoretical, the insights could have significant practical implications for improving the sample quality and training stability of flow-based models, which are widely used in generative modeling, representation learning, and other areas of machine learning. Further research is needed to fully understand the real-world performance of flow matching compared to existing techniques, but this paper lays an important foundation for advancing the state of the art in flow-based generative modeling.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Flow matching achieves minimax optimal convergence
Total Score

0

Flow matching achieves minimax optimal convergence

Kenji Fukumizu, Taiji Suzuki, Noboru Isobe, Kazusato Oko, Masanori Koyama

Flow matching (FM) has gained significant attention as a simulation-free generative model. Unlike diffusion models, which are based on stochastic differential equations, FM employs a simpler approach by solving an ordinary differential equation with an initial condition from a normal distribution, thus streamlining the sample generation process. This paper discusses the convergence properties of FM in terms of the $p$-Wasserstein distance, a measure of distributional discrepancy. We establish that FM can achieve the minmax optimal convergence rate for $1 leq p leq 2$, presenting the first theoretical evidence that FM can reach convergence rates comparable to those of diffusion models. Our analysis extends existing frameworks by examining a broader class of mean and variance functions for the vector fields and identifies specific conditions necessary to attain these optimal rates.

Read more

6/3/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Theoretical guarantees in KL for Diffusion Flow Matching

Marta Gentiloni Silveri, Giovanni Conforti, Alain Durmus

Flow Matching (FM) (also referred to as stochastic interpolants or rectified flows) stands out as a class of generative models that aims to bridge in finite time the target distribution $nu^star$ with an auxiliary distribution $mu$, leveraging a fixed coupling $pi$ and a bridge which can either be deterministic or stochastic. These two ingredients define a path measure which can then be approximated by learning the drift of its Markovian projection. The main contribution of this paper is to provide relatively mild assumptions on $nu^star$, $mu$ and $pi$ to obtain non-asymptotics guarantees for Diffusion Flow Matching (DFM) models using as bridge the conditional distribution associated with the Brownian motion. More precisely, we establish bounds on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the target distribution and the one generated by such DFM models under moment conditions on the score of $nu^star$, $mu$ and $pi$, and a standard $L^2$-drift-approximation error assumption.

Read more

9/16/2024

Flow Map Matching
Total Score

0

Flow Map Matching

Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael S. Albergo, Eric Vanden-Eijnden

Generative models based on dynamical transport of measure, such as diffusion models, flow matching models, and stochastic interpolants, learn an ordinary or stochastic differential equation whose trajectories push initial conditions from a known base distribution onto the target. While training is cheap, samples are generated via simulation, which is more expensive than one-step models like GANs. To close this gap, we introduce flow map matching -- an algorithm that learns the two-time flow map of an underlying ordinary differential equation. The approach leads to an efficient few-step generative model whose step count can be chosen a-posteriori to smoothly trade off accuracy for computational expense. Leveraging the stochastic interpolant framework, we introduce losses for both direct training of flow maps and distillation from pre-trained (or otherwise known) velocity fields. Theoretically, we show that our approach unifies many existing few-step generative models, including consistency models, consistency trajectory models, progressive distillation, and neural operator approaches, which can be obtained as particular cases of our formalism. With experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 32x32, we show that flow map matching leads to high-quality samples with significantly reduced sampling cost compared to diffusion or stochastic interpolant methods.

Read more

6/12/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Discrete Flow Matching

Itai Gat, Tal Remez, Neta Shaul, Felix Kreuk, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, Yaron Lipman

Despite Flow Matching and diffusion models having emerged as powerful generative paradigms for continuous variables such as images and videos, their application to high-dimensional discrete data, such as language, is still limited. In this work, we present Discrete Flow Matching, a novel discrete flow paradigm designed specifically for generating discrete data. Discrete Flow Matching offers several key contributions: (i) it works with a general family of probability paths interpolating between source and target distributions; (ii) it allows for a generic formula for sampling from these probability paths using learned posteriors such as the probability denoiser ($x$-prediction) and noise-prediction ($epsilon$-prediction); (iii) practically, focusing on specific probability paths defined with different schedulers considerably improves generative perplexity compared to previous discrete diffusion and flow models; and (iv) by scaling Discrete Flow Matching models up to 1.7B parameters, we reach 6.7% Pass@1 and 13.4% Pass@10 on HumanEval and 6.7% Pass@1 and 20.6% Pass@10 on 1-shot MBPP coding benchmarks. Our approach is capable of generating high-quality discrete data in a non-autoregressive fashion, significantly closing the gap between autoregressive models and discrete flow models.

Read more

7/23/2024