Theoretical Understanding of In-Context Learning in Shallow Transformers with Unstructured Data
2402.00743
0
0
🤔
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful models that can learn concepts at the inference stage via in-context learning (ICL). While theoretical studies, e.g., cite{zhang2023trained}, attempt to explain the mechanism of ICL, they assume the input $x_i$ and the output $y_i$ of each demonstration example are in the same token (i.e., structured data). However, in real practice, the examples are usually text input, and all words, regardless of their logic relationship, are stored in different tokens (i.e., unstructured data cite{wibisono2023role}). To understand how LLMs learn from the unstructured data in ICL, this paper studies the role of each component in the transformer architecture and provides a theoretical understanding to explain the success of the architecture. In particular, we consider a simple transformer with one/two attention layers and linear regression tasks for the ICL prediction. We observe that (1) a transformer with two layers of (self-)attentions with a look-ahead attention mask can learn from the prompt in the unstructured data, and (2) positional encoding can match the $x_i$ and $y_i$ tokens to achieve a better ICL performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) learn from unstructured data during in-context learning (ICL).
- While previous theoretical studies assumed the input and output data were structured, this paper focuses on how LLMs learn from unstructured text data.
- The paper examines the role of each component in the transformer architecture and provides a theoretical understanding of why the transformer architecture is successful for ICL with unstructured data.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can learn new concepts by studying examples provided to them, a process known as in-context learning (ICL). Previous research on ICL has assumed that the example data used to train the models is structured, meaning the input and output are clearly defined and organized.
However, in reality, the examples LLMs learn from are often just text, where the relationships between different words and ideas are not explicitly structured. This paper aims to understand how LLMs are able to learn from this unstructured data during ICL.
The researchers looked at the individual components of the transformer architecture, which is commonly used for LLMs. They found that a transformer model with two layers of attention, along with a special "look-ahead" attention mask, can effectively learn from unstructured text prompts. Additionally, the positional encoding used in transformers helps the model match the input and output tokens, improving its ICL performance.
This provides important insights into the inner workings of LLMs and explains why the transformer architecture is well-suited for learning from real-world, unstructured data through ICL, rather than just structured datasets.
Technical Explanation
This paper studies the role of each component in the transformer architecture to understand how large language models (LLMs) can learn effectively from unstructured data during in-context learning (ICL).
Previous theoretical studies on ICL, such as Zhang et al. (2023), have assumed that the input x_i and output y_i of each demonstration example are in the same token, or structured data. However, in practice, the examples used to train LLMs are typically unstructured text, where all words are stored as separate tokens, regardless of their logical relationships.
To understand how LLMs can learn from this unstructured data during ICL, the researchers considered a simple transformer model with one or two attention layers, trained on linear regression tasks. They made two key observations:
- A transformer with two layers of (self-)attention, along with a "look-ahead" attention mask, can effectively learn from the prompts in the unstructured text data.
- The positional encoding used in transformers helps the model match the
x_iandy_itokens, leading to better ICL performance.
These findings provide a theoretical explanation for the success of the transformer architecture in learning from unstructured data through ICL, in contrast to the assumptions made in previous theoretical studies that focused on structured data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into how the components of the transformer architecture enable large language models (LLMs) to learn effectively from unstructured data during in-context learning (ICL). However, the researchers acknowledge that their analysis is based on a simplified transformer model and linear regression tasks, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world LLM applications.
One potential limitation is that the paper does not explore how the findings might scale to larger, more complex transformer models and more diverse tasks. It would be interesting to see if the same principles hold true for state-of-the-art LLMs and a wider range of applications, such as natural language generation or question-answering.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues that may arise when LLMs learn from unstructured data, such as the potential for biases or the difficulty of interpreting the model's reasoning. Further research is needed to understand the broader implications and potential risks of LLMs learning from unstructured data through ICL.
Overall, this paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding how transformers learn from unstructured data, which is an important step in advancing our understanding of these powerful AI systems. However, additional research is needed to fully explore the practical applications and potential challenges of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper offers important insights into how large language models (LLMs) can learn effectively from unstructured data during in-context learning (ICL). By examining the individual components of the transformer architecture, the researchers show that a two-layer transformer with a look-ahead attention mask and positional encoding can successfully learn from text prompts, even when the input and output data are not explicitly structured.
These findings help explain the success of the transformer architecture for LLMs, which are increasingly being used in a wide range of applications. The ability to learn from unstructured data is a crucial capability, as much of the real-world information that LLMs encounter is in the form of natural language text, rather than structured datasets.
The insights provided in this paper lay the groundwork for further research into how LLMs can be designed and trained to learn even more effectively from unstructured data, potentially leading to even more powerful and versatile AI systems that can better understand and interact with the world around them.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
How In-Context Learning Emerges from Training on Unstructured Data: On the Role of Co-Occurrence, Positional Information, and Noise Structures
Kevin Christian Wibisono, Yixin Wang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) like transformers have impressive in-context learning (ICL) capabilities; they can generate predictions for new queries based on input-output sequences in prompts without parameter updates. While many theories have attempted to explain ICL, they often focus on structured training data similar to ICL tasks, such as regression. In practice, however, these models are trained in an unsupervised manner on unstructured text data, which bears little resemblance to ICL tasks. To this end, we investigate how ICL emerges from unsupervised training on unstructured data. The key observation is that ICL can arise simply by modeling co-occurrence information using classical language models like continuous bag of words (CBOW), which we theoretically prove and empirically validate. Furthermore, we establish the necessity of positional information and noise structure to generalize ICL to unseen data. Finally, we present instances where ICL fails and provide theoretical explanations; they suggest that the ICL ability of LLMs to identify certain tasks can be sensitive to the structure of the training data.
6/4/2024
Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently?
Zhenmei Shi, Junyi Wei, Zhuoyan Xu, Yingyu Liang
0
0
Large language models (LLM) have emerged as a powerful tool for AI, with the key ability of in-context learning (ICL), where they can perform well on unseen tasks based on a brief series of task examples without necessitating any adjustments to the model parameters. One recent interesting mysterious observation is that models of different scales may have different ICL behaviors: larger models tend to be more sensitive to noise in the test context. This work studies this observation theoretically aiming to improve the understanding of LLM and ICL. We analyze two stylized settings: (1) linear regression with one-layer single-head linear transformers and (2) parity classification with two-layer multiple attention heads transformers (non-linear data and non-linear model). In both settings, we give closed-form optimal solutions and find that smaller models emphasize important hidden features while larger ones cover more hidden features; thus, smaller models are more robust to noise while larger ones are more easily distracted, leading to different ICL behaviors. This sheds light on where transformers pay attention to and how that affects ICL. Preliminary experimental results on large base and chat models provide positive support for our analysis.
5/31/2024
Asymptotic theory of in-context learning by linear attention
Yue M. Lu, Mary I. Letey, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Anindita Maiti, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
Transformers have a remarkable ability to learn and execute tasks based on examples provided within the input itself, without explicit prior training. It has been argued that this capability, known as in-context learning (ICL), is a cornerstone of Transformers' success, yet questions about the necessary sample complexity, pretraining task diversity, and context length for successful ICL remain unresolved. Here, we provide a precise answer to these questions in an exactly solvable model of ICL of a linear regression task by linear attention. We derive sharp asymptotics for the learning curve in a phenomenologically-rich scaling regime where the token dimension is taken to infinity; the context length and pretraining task diversity scale proportionally with the token dimension; and the number of pretraining examples scales quadratically. We demonstrate a double-descent learning curve with increasing pretraining examples, and uncover a phase transition in the model's behavior between low and high task diversity regimes: In the low diversity regime, the model tends toward memorization of training tasks, whereas in the high diversity regime, it achieves genuine in-context learning and generalization beyond the scope of pretrained tasks. These theoretical insights are empirically validated through experiments with both linear attention and full nonlinear Transformer architectures.
5/21/2024
💬
What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis
Jiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit an intriguing ability to learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL). Understandably, a swath of research has been dedicated to uncovering the theories underpinning ICL. One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. LLMs identify the task based on the demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration. Finally, a third hypothesis argues that LLMs use the demonstration to select a composition of tasks learned during pre-training to perform ICL. In this paper, we empirically explore these three hypotheses that explain LLMs' ability to learn in context with a suite of experiments derived from common text classification tasks. We invalidate the first two hypotheses with counterexamples and provide evidence in support of the last hypothesis. Our results suggest an LLM could learn a novel task in context via composing tasks learned during pre-training.
6/11/2024