How In-Context Learning Emerges from Training on Unstructured Data: On the Role of Co-Occurrence, Positional Information, and Noise Structures
2406.00131
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) like transformers have impressive in-context learning (ICL) capabilities; they can generate predictions for new queries based on input-output sequences in prompts without parameter updates. While many theories have attempted to explain ICL, they often focus on structured training data similar to ICL tasks, such as regression. In practice, however, these models are trained in an unsupervised manner on unstructured text data, which bears little resemblance to ICL tasks. To this end, we investigate how ICL emerges from unsupervised training on unstructured data. The key observation is that ICL can arise simply by modeling co-occurrence information using classical language models like continuous bag of words (CBOW), which we theoretically prove and empirically validate. Furthermore, we establish the necessity of positional information and noise structure to generalize ICL to unseen data. Finally, we present instances where ICL fails and provide theoretical explanations; they suggest that the ICL ability of LLMs to identify certain tasks can be sensitive to the structure of the training data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how in-context learning, the ability of language models to perform new tasks by simply observing examples, emerges from training on unstructured data.
- The researchers investigate the role of co-occurrence, positional information, and noise structures in enabling in-context learning.
- They conduct experiments to understand the factors that contribute to this capability and its limitations.
Plain English Explanation
In-context learning is a fascinating phenomenon where language models can learn to perform new tasks simply by observing a few examples, without any explicit training. This paper explores how this ability emerges from training on large, unstructured datasets, like the internet.
The key insights are that the model's ability to learn from context is closely tied to its understanding of co-occurrence - how words and concepts tend to appear together - as well as the positional information embedded in the text. Additionally, the noise structures inherent in unstructured data play an important role in shaping this in-context learning capability.
By conducting a series of experiments, the researchers were able to tease apart the relative contributions of these different factors and understand the limitations of in-context learning. This provides valuable insights into how language models can exploit cross-task context to rapidly acquire new skills.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the factors that enable in-context learning, the ability of language models to perform new tasks by simply observing a few examples. Through a series of experiments, the researchers explore the role of co-occurrence, positional information, and noise structures in shaping this capability.
First, the authors demonstrate that the model's understanding of co-occurrence - how words and concepts tend to appear together in the training data - is a key component of in-context learning. They show that disrupting these co-occurrence patterns, for example by shuffling the order of words, significantly impairs the model's ability to learn from context.
Next, the paper examines the importance of positional information - the model's awareness of the relative positions of words and concepts in the text. The researchers find that removing this positional information, for instance by masking the word order, also hinders in-context learning, suggesting that the model relies on this structural information to rapidly adapt to new tasks.
Finally, the authors explore the impact of noise structures inherent in unstructured training data, such as the Zipfian distribution of word frequencies. They demonstrate that these noise structures play a crucial role in shaping the in-context learning capabilities of the model, and that disrupting these patterns can degrade performance.
Through these experiments, the paper provides valuable insights into the mechanisms that underlie in-context learning and how it emerges from training on large, unstructured datasets. This understanding can inform the design of more robust and adaptable language models in the future.
Critical Analysis
While the paper offers important insights into the factors that enable in-context learning, it also highlights some of the limitations and potential issues with this capability. The authors acknowledge that in-context learning, while powerful, is not always robust or generalizable, as the model's performance can be heavily influenced by the specific patterns and structures present in the training data.
One potential concern is the reliance on co-occurrence and positional information, which could make the models vulnerable to distributional shift or adversarial attacks that disrupt these patterns. Additionally, the authors note that the noise structures inherent in unstructured data, while important for shaping in-context learning, may also introduce biases and artifacts that could limit the model's broader applicability.
Further research is needed to better understand the interplay between these different factors and to explore ways of developing in-context learning capabilities that are more robust and generalizable. Incorporating more structured or curated data sources, as well as exploring alternative training regimes and architectural designs, may be fruitful avenues for improving the reliability and versatility of in-context learning.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying in-context learning, a remarkable capability of language models to rapidly adapt to new tasks by simply observing examples. The researchers demonstrate the crucial roles of co-occurrence, positional information, and noise structures in shaping this ability, which emerges from training on large, unstructured datasets.
These findings contribute to our understanding of how language models can exploit cross-task context to acquire new skills, with potential implications for the development of more versatile and adaptable AI systems. However, the paper also highlights the limitations and potential vulnerabilities of in-context learning, suggesting the need for further research to improve its robustness and generalizability.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
Theoretical Understanding of In-Context Learning in Shallow Transformers with Unstructured Data
Yue Xing, Xiaofeng Lin, Chenheng Xu, Namjoon Suh, Qifan Song, Guang Cheng
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful models that can learn concepts at the inference stage via in-context learning (ICL). While theoretical studies, e.g., cite{zhang2023trained}, attempt to explain the mechanism of ICL, they assume the input $x_i$ and the output $y_i$ of each demonstration example are in the same token (i.e., structured data). However, in real practice, the examples are usually text input, and all words, regardless of their logic relationship, are stored in different tokens (i.e., unstructured data cite{wibisono2023role}). To understand how LLMs learn from the unstructured data in ICL, this paper studies the role of each component in the transformer architecture and provides a theoretical understanding to explain the success of the architecture. In particular, we consider a simple transformer with one/two attention layers and linear regression tasks for the ICL prediction. We observe that (1) a transformer with two layers of (self-)attentions with a look-ahead attention mask can learn from the prompt in the unstructured data, and (2) positional encoding can match the $x_i$ and $y_i$ tokens to achieve a better ICL performance.
6/19/2024
🌿
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui
0
0
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.
6/19/2024
🌀
In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax
Aaron Mueller, Albert Webson, Jackson Petty, Tal Linzen
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.
4/11/2024
💬
What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis
Jiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit an intriguing ability to learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL). Understandably, a swath of research has been dedicated to uncovering the theories underpinning ICL. One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. LLMs identify the task based on the demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration. Finally, a third hypothesis argues that LLMs use the demonstration to select a composition of tasks learned during pre-training to perform ICL. In this paper, we empirically explore these three hypotheses that explain LLMs' ability to learn in context with a suite of experiments derived from common text classification tasks. We invalidate the first two hypotheses with counterexamples and provide evidence in support of the last hypothesis. Our results suggest an LLM could learn a novel task in context via composing tasks learned during pre-training.
6/11/2024